result #103079 - WOULD YOU RISK YOUR LIFE WITH ONLY THE CHANCE OF SAVING SOMEONES LIFE?

user ballots

ethics :

WOULD YOU RISK YOUR LIFE WITH ONLY THE CHANCE OF SAVING SOMEONES LIFE?


[+] ballot by FiddleFaddleOnLSD
ACTIVE Oct 08,2006 - Fri Jul 03, 09

Yes, I would 25
No, I would not 3

Ballot #103079: has 28 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:




similiar ballots:
79136. Would you risk your life to testify against a killer?
112133. Would you risk your life to save a police officer?
100211. Toughest movie star in real life, that would have best chance of...
11272. If you would have the chance once in your life to do a thing that would be immediately undone so without any consequences what would you choose to do?
26643. Does a terminally ill person has the moral right to end his or her life when they have made the decision that their quality of life is gone.
70030. Would you prefer to be in a vegetative state for the rest of your life, or have your life ended..?
94562. Has your view on life ever been drastically changed by one single incident in your life?
119446. ...and this 'Bay Watch' bikini life jacket is meant to save your life?! Huh
94871. Is a civilian's life worth more than a soldier's life?
119058. Would you sacrifice your own life to save your best friend's life?




if you don't see an image, click here.

email this ballot link to friends

COMMENTS:
I expect that you will take this ballot with the intended seriousness and not resort to priest jokes.

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Sun Oct 08, 06 7:20pm [+]

Voted : Yes, I would
If the photographs represent the kind of thing you mean, definitely.
by skylab on Sun Oct 08, 06 7:23pm [+]

Voted : Yes, I would
Yes, and I have.
by Grumpy_Person on Sun Oct 08, 06 7:38pm [+]

Voted : Yes, I would
And instinctivly without hesitation for family and loved ones. I have always had a habit of getting in the middle of nasty fights, even among strangers, to either break them up or protect someone from serious harm, although its been a while since that last happened. I would like to think that most people would act to save others.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Sun Oct 08, 06 8:46pm [+]

There are too many unknown variables here. I think most "heroic" actions are spontaneous things. We see someone drowning and we jump into save them (or we don't); we hear a baby crying inside a burning house, and we rush in to save it (or we don't). I don't think most heroism is a rational process. So, I don't know what I'd do. We'll have to wait and see (or we won't).
by margaret123 on Sun Oct 08, 06 10:16pm [+]

Voted : Yes, I would
Pure instinct, not heroics.
by mojo on Mon Oct 09, 06 6:42am [+]

Who knows? I think that would be a split second decision in most cases. None of us know really what we would do.
by xhiker on Tue Oct 10, 06 5:17am [+]

Voted : Yes, I would
For the right person, yes. Her name is Frankie and she's worth it.
by Guest User from [69.182.53.173] on Fri Jan 26, 07 1:47am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved