search this site: search the web:
Welcome to our New Server! Stronger, faster, with 10% bodyfat!
.it may take about 24 hours to make sure everything got transferred here all right.

result #106009 - NEWT GINGRICH: NEW LIMITS ON FREE SPEECH NECESSARY TO FIGHT TERRORISM

user ballots

political :

NEWT GINGRICH: NEW LIMITS ON FREE SPEECH NECESSARY TO FIGHT TERRORISM


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Nov 28,2006 - Sun Aug 23, 09
Gingrich raises alarm at event honoring those who stand up for freedom of speech

Union Leader, 11/27/2006

MANCHESTER – Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich yesterday said the country will be forced to reexamine freedom of speech to meet the threat of terrorism.

Gingrich, speaking at a Manchester awards banquet, said a "different set of rules" may be needed to reduce terrorists' ability to use the Internet and free speech to recruit and get out their message.

"We need to get ahead of the curve before we actually lose a city, which I think could happen in the next decade," said Gingrich, a Republican who helped engineer the GOP's takeover of Congress in 1994.

* * * * * * * *

Do you agree with Gingrich, that America's traditional free speech rights must be curtailed to fight terrorism?

Yes, freedom of speech threatens America 9
No, we can have free speech and be safe from terrorism 8
No we can not defend liberty aboard by abandoning it at home 3

Ballot #106009: has 20 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:
Register to submit comments.
You may still vote without registration.

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:




if you don't see an image, click here.

email this ballot link to friends
You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/v/106009.htm



similiar ballots:
112915. How big a hypocritical asshole is Newt Gingrich?
92757. SURVIVAL BALLOT!! You are out spelunking, deep in a cave, when suddenly you find Newt Gingrich, covered in mud and very hungry! HOW WILL YOU SURVIVE?
88573. Hate speech ... free speech ... whatever. Should there be a new independent category called 'Humor speech'?
61109. Internet Free Speech: Is it really free?
101308. Which is better - free speech or right speech?
55848. Why in a country of free speech
56639. Yet Another Example of Republicans Trying to Stifle Free Speech? Yes/No
112838. "Free Speech" on a website : Is that even viable?
32840. What do you think of the George Bush free speech zones?
113197. Should free speech be limited by government policy?

COMMENTS:
Poor scared little man

by Mr_Susan on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:34am [+]

crank - where did you get that pic?
by Mr_Susan on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:35am [+]

They would never get away with it would they? ..... Would they?
by B_P on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:46am [+]

He probably means war protests, or even peace symbols.
And soon Katrina history will be covered up, for future's sake :(
by Jyl on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:55am [+]

Yes, if we allow peace symbols, the terrorists will have won.
by cranky on Tue Nov 28, 06 11:12am [+]

Voted : No, we can have free speech and be safe from terrorism
If we take away our freedoms, then the terrorists win. It would mean that they scared or terrorised us Westerners into hurting ourselves.
by xxxxxxxx on Tue Nov 28, 06 11:34am [+]

Gingrich is a fool because his solution would be far worst than the problem itself.I understand that we are in a war on terror but to servely limit those natural rights that so many American service men died for would be in itself handing a victory over to the terrorist because we would be changing our way of life.
by Corrupt on Tue Nov 28, 06 12:34pm [+]

Voted : No, we can have free speech and be safe from terrorism
Nice pic.
by skylab on Tue Nov 28, 06 12:50pm [+]

It makes you wonder who are the real terrorists here?
by _Beelzebubba on Tue Nov 28, 06 1:01pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2009 BEST AND WORST dot com All Rights Reserved