COMMENTS:
you need to make the distinction between paedophiles and child rapists. i know at least 2 paedophiles, and they'd never hurt anyone. and rape is not about sex, it's about power. then there's the jacko kind, i don't think there's anything sexual or malicious in his mind, i think he's just fucked up in the head and thinks he's a little kid.
They never hurt anyone aye? Maybe because they never had the chance to?
i said "they'd", not "they've".
do you go out and rape everything that turns you on? do you think people with other sexual orientations do? how about preferences, fetishes? does every guy who likes women's feet do what that cguy did in that episode of csi, start fake fires toget into women's apartments, drug them, paint their toenails, and kill them? some people are turned on by the elderly too, why does nobody assume they go out and rape and murder old grandmothers all the time? how can someone hurt what they love? and how can you persecute someone for their hormones? it's actually considered NORMAL foor people to be aroused by power more than sex, and indulge in rape fantasies. half the mainstream pornography industry is rape-related, it's completely tolerated. but once someone's hormones cross that line of 13 and below (or 15 in the united states), they have to either keep that a complete secret, bottling it up inside (which inevitably results in violent behavior, nomatter what smene is attracted to), without even the help of fantasies like pornography as a release (even people turned on by murder can watch snuff films without a problem), or lose their job, their hme, their family, be attacked in the streets, and be charged for crimes they never committed. is this the one thing we have left over from out times of barbaric intolerence, the one lingering senseless persecution of innocent people based on their genes? it's like having huan sacrifice in a uniarian universalist congregation, such barbarism amoungst so much progress. it's insane.
i said "they'd", not "they've". as in, it would never occur to them.
do you go out and rape everything that turns you on? do you think people with other sexual orientations do? how about preferences, fetishes? does every guy who likes women's feet do what that cguy did in that episode of csi, start fake fires toget into women's apartments, drug them, paint their toenails, and kill them? some people are turned on by the elderly too, why does nobody assume they go out and rape and murder old grandmothers all the time? how can someone hurt what they love? and how can you persecute someone for their hormones? it's actually considered NORMAL foor people to be aroused by power more than sex, and indulge in rape fantasies. half the mainstream pornography industry is rape-related, it's completely tolerated. but once someone's hormones cross that line of 13 and below (or 15 in the united states), they have to either keep that a complete secret, bottling it up inside (which inevitably results in violent behavior, nomatter what smene is attracted to), without even the help of fantasies like pornography as a release (even people turned on by murder can watch snuff films without a problem), or lose their job, their home, their family, be attacked in the streets, and be charged for crimes they never committed. is this the one thing we have left over from out times of barbaric intolerence, the one lingering senseless persecution of innocent people based on their genes? it's like having huan sacrifice in a uniarian universalist congregation, such barbarism amoungst so much progress. it's insane.
^What a pile of bollocks!
Paedophiles are opportunists and selfish cunts who will either rape/deceive a child into having sex with them as soon as they got the chance. They love nothing but themselves; the drive force behind their desire is their own satisfaction; there is only "I" with them and the child is but an appendix. And dont you realise that a 13 year old kid/girl is not fully developed as to make important decisions regarding sex for example? Oh sure sure, they think about sex and may even tease a grown up everynow and then. But sane adults discourage that and orient them in the right way.
Yeah, i've met some of these fuckheads online and i must say you use their rethoric, verbatim. That's not good...not good at all.
*get the chance*
"distinction between paedophiles and child rapists"
are you for real?
ok, how would you make that distinction, and would you agree both should be locked up in 8x10 cell, forever on a small deserted island?
by LCD on Wed Dec 20, 06 3:32pm
[+]
the exact same statements were made about homosexuals. now even necrophilia and sadism are almost socially acceptable, yet anyone who has sexual attraction toward a so called "child" is violently persecuted. it's hypocrisy. something cannot be wrong unless it is both intentional and harmful. hormones are uncontrollable, and sexual attraction which is not acted on forcably is harmless.
There's nothing wrong with sadism as long as the individuals engaged in it are legally imputable ADULTS!
And since when necrophilia is almost socially accepted???
As for uncontrollable hormones, well, that's not quite true since they invented the chemical castration. And you know what, it sounds of a silly excuse. Would you accepet that explanation if a serial killer assassinated all your family?
The reason why paedophiles cant be compared to homossexuals relies on the fact that the latter do not force themselves on anyone, especially someone young, who hasnt developed all the mental and physical instruments to fully understand what's "going on". Like i said, paedophiles are driven by extreme selfishness. Their pleasure obliterates the suffering they may be inflicting on a helpless child.
again, rape has nothing to do with sex. and like i said, paedophiles do not force themselves either, no more than anyone else. if they did, you'd have at least one rape every day in your neighborhood. you are making the same statements that were made about homosexuals before people got over their prejudices and looked at the facts.
allow me to point out the holes in that:
1: you do not define "adults". if you mean a person who is mature enough to make a decision of that significance, then age has nothing to do with it. most people aren't mature enough for educated consent to sex when they're in their thirties.
2: supression is not control.
3: how do you connect sex with murder? and hormones with serial killing?
4: who says paedophiles force themselves?
5: you're going by the barbaric abrahamic concept of children being "pure" and "innocent", which are undefinable qualities, used to mean weak and inferior, yet somehow sacred. the whole reason people are so passionate over the issue is a combination of parental overprotection instict, and the abrahamic concept of sex as evil. observe how people try to protect their children from sexuality that's not even aimed at them. it's absurd. that seems to be the general approach to child raising in the western world, to keep them from learning, keep them from growing up, keep them cute and weak and stupid. that's one of the main reasons why we have so many problems, kids are being turned into "children". and they stay that way, all their lives. either living as useless sheep or greedy spoiled brats. i am so glad i outgrew religion when i was six.
sorry for the off topic rant there. all these problems are connected. and of course, they all lead back to faith.
|
