COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes, the new UN Secretery General seems to be a slight improvement
I have gotten that impression. He just seems more determined and idealistic to truly struggle against UN corruption. But I don't think he will succeed, as one idealistic individual is not enough against an incompetent and backward bureaucracy like the UN.
Too soon to tell. If so it'd be a wonderful turn around, not that he'd have to do much to be better than the last guy.
I'll hold off judgement for now on this guy.
Voted : Yes, the new UN Secretery General seems to be a slight improvement
Those Asians are just so darned efficient.
"not that he'd have to do much to be better than the last guy."
Is necon herzog talking about Bush?
And it was easy to tell that this wasn't a herzog ballot, since it didn't absolutely condemn the UN; rather, it held out hope that, at some point, the UN might become somewhat less incompetent and corrupt than the Bush Administration.
Socrates, if you are going to produce clone ballots that live up to the bigotry of the original, you'll have to remember: The UN is ALWAYS bad.
Voted : We will see
Advertisement Seems like an improvement but I wonder how much of it was due to the fact that the object of corruption is North Korea.
PS... get rid of the advertisement before you submit the ballot
cranky- "if you are going to produce clone ballots that live up to the bigotry of the original, you'll have to remember: The UN is ALWAYS bad."
- I cannot make such ballots, because I do not believe that absolutely everything about the UN is bad. There are some things I actually indeed admire about the UN: see ballot #105292
|
