COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes
... but I don't agree with him on many, many other things.
by mojo on Thu Jan 25, 07 5:57am
[+]
here's the most trustworthy looks those three have ^^^ throw Rove in and it looks like a freekin horror movie.
it scares the hell out of me that we agreed to put our future in their hands.
by Jyl on Thu Jan 25, 07 6:32am
[+]
Voted : Yes
If he means that Bush is their stooge, then yes. He is correct.
Then again, it's about as hypocritical as John McCain saying he was badly served by the rest of the Keating five.
Voted : Yes
But it's his own dumb fault but taking them along with him
by Kiki on Thu Jan 25, 07 10:18am
[+]
Voted : Yes
Sure. What's not to agree with? And he can say that now with a degree of confidence that it's okay politically. The tide has turned.
Voted : Yes
McCain would be a much better President than Bush.
Voted : No
Last I looked, that "damn piece of paper" called the Constitution made Mister Bush the man in charge, and he could've- hell, had a *moral obligation*- fired them when he saw that their "leadership" wasn't in the best interests of the country. McCain's talking out the side of his neck. I've really tried to admire the man, since he's an ex-Navy man, but he's proving himself more polly than anything.
Voted : Yes
Yes, but McCain isn't any better IMHO.
^Isn't any better than Bush, Rumsfeld, or Cheney.
Voted : Comment
McCain obviously will say anything at this point to get elected President...I don't trust his soft and sweet talking tone (I guess this is his attempt to appear to be the compassionate conversative with that tone of his), I for one don't trust him. Yes, Bush has been very badly served by both RUNSfeld and W(ch)eney, (I think more so by W(ch)eney)...
Voted : No
Yeah, I'm going to believe something from that chipmunk from the Keating five.
Yeah, he got served alright. He's only their lapdog.  
|
