user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
It seems that you are linking a political bombing in Pakistan {the target was an American hotel where foriegners stay} with the religious violence in Iraq. where is the nexis?
^The police were clearing the way for a Shiite festival. The festival had been targets from prious attacks. If the hotel was the target it would have happened inside of the hotel (where it would cause maximum damage/deaths.
*previous
It seems more of the same as opposed to religious civil war to me. Civil wars don't really expand over that type of distance.
Religion holds no borders.
Voted : yes
It will most certainly expand. Noblesse is semi-correct -- this is not only a religious conflict. It is a rich mexture of theological and geopolitical. However, I believe he is mistaken in sayiong it won't spread because it is a civil war. Remember that the borders of Iraq are an arbitrary imposition made by Britain, after WW2 -- one that cut across various loose and largely unformalized tribal/ religious 'boundaries.'
You didn't ask about religious war but civil war.
^Please ignore that. I meant that since Iraq is in civil war that the likelihood of it spreading was nil. However, yes. Religious war could erupt in Pakistan. I don't think it would "spread" from Iraq though.
A couple things. Civals wars have spread across borders in the past (Sudan's 1970s cival war, Columbia's cival war - numerous examples). Today distance is irrelevant. News on the other side of the world takes mere seconds to get. Mix that with some extremists wanting to "defending" their religion and it could easily spread to other countries.
|
|