result #112012 - GENOCIDE MAY REDUCE GREENHOUSE GASES

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

GENOCIDE MAY REDUCE GREENHOUSE GASES

[+] joke ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Feb 06,2007 - Sun Nov 01, 09

If 4 million cars were taken off the road in a single year, stopping 9 billion kilograms of carbon dioxide being discharged, most environmentalists would whoop with joy. But what if the same saving came from committing genocide?

This is the claim of an annual audit of mass killings done by the International Conquest by the Aryan Races (ICAR), which is funded largely by secret donations from wealthy neocons and members of the Bush Administration.

The audit, published on 18 January, bases its estimate on Sudanese genocide in 2005 in the Africa. Graham Brookes of PG Economics in Dorchester, UK, who supplied the data, says 85 per cent of the savings come from the fact that dead people don’t produce greenhouse gases from fires, industry, driving vehicles, and flatulence. This, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on the Promotion of Genocide, prevents the release of 300 kilograms of CO2 per year per hectare. The rest of the figure is from fuel savings (Neo-Nazi Digest, vol 9, p 139).

Gundula Azeozog of the Ethnic Cleansing Association, which represents facists, neo-nazis and white supremicists, says the ICAR is only interested in promoting genocide in Africa.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Assuming their numbers are accurate, would you support the increased use of genocide to reduce carbon emissions?

No	7
Yes	3
Depends on whether it includes me	0

Ballot #112012: has 10 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
112001. GM crops may reduce greenhouse gases
88489. If George W. Bush doesn't believe in global warming then why is he suddenly concerned about greenhouse gases?
112010. Should animals do their part to reduce greenhouse gasses?
112597. Important Presentation and Bodily Gases : what would you do?
39319. Do you worry about global warming ( greenhouse effect ) ?
114422. How would Al Gore spin the greenhouse gas increasing during his two terms
93088. Greenhouse Gas : How long until the planet becomes inhabitable, given the current trend?
72992. What should be done to reduce or eliminate child abuse?
73076. What should be done to reduce the number of overweight people in the US?
102656. Should tape worms be ingested to reduce obesity?

if you don't see an image, click here.

email this ballot link to friends

COMMENTS:
Voted : No
I'm sure that all the hype about "climate change" is meant to justify such actions.

Don't think for a minute that the powers that be don't have a plan in place to depopulate the planet of us oxygen-breathers.

by _Beelzebubba on Tue Feb 06, 07 8:31am [+]

Voted : Depends on whether it includes me
I don't drive. Really!

by passiveson on Tue Feb 06, 07 9:09am [+]

Voted : Yes
of course. finally! an eco-friendly plan that helps the enivornment, reduces over-population and, helps reduce world hunger to boot. let's do it!

by Kev24 on Tue Feb 06, 07 11:36am [+]

Voted : Yes
TO paraphrase Cleavon Little from "Blazing Saddles", "Where the white supremacists at?"

by Truthseeker013 on Tue Feb 06, 07 2:00pm [+]

Voted : No
They sure look on the sunny side of that issue.

by skylab on Tue Feb 06, 07 4:31pm [+]

Voted : No
Well no. But maybe for all those cows with their methane producing butts.

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Tue Feb 06, 07 6:01pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact