search this site: search the web:
Anybody can vote, registered or not!

result #114117 - HOW MUCH COVERAGE IS ENOUGH?

user ballots

HOW MUCH COVERAGE IS ENOUGH?


[+] serious ballot by audreyanne
created Thu Apr 19, 07
I don't watch TV very much, and rarely in English. But I spend a lot of time at the physiotherapy centre where I have a lot of English speaking friends - and they have a TV in their central room - This week, except when there was a hockey game, they have had it turned on to the american channels that have the news on all the time - and all they have covered are the killings at Virginia Tech. It is horrible - I agree - and my heart goes out to all the people who have been hurt and are grieved by it. But I think the coverage is excessive - interviewing the people who live across the street from the killer's parents - or the friend of the roommate who lived across the hall from the killer. Showing again and again the video of the killer, or the cell phone footage where you can hear the shots being fired. I don't really see what you can gain from watching all that. And it doesn't respect the people's need for privacy and give them time to grieve.

Even my TV addicted friends have changed back to the Canadian channels who still cover the story, but also cover other local and international news, and hockey.

I think it is too much - after the first shock of trying to understand what happened, and if it is still happening - I don't understand why the news prolongs the sensationalism aspects of these stories so much. I think it was the same thing when Anna Nicole Smith died. It was even worse I think then, because even though it was a tragic death, it was just one person, and it wasn't senseless murder.

Once the facts of the story are clear and established, then they should move on 81%
As long as people watch, and the ratings are high 18%

Ballot #114117: has 22 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:



email this ballot link to friends
You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/key/How_much_coverage_is_enough?



similiar ballots:
122506. Where's the coverage?
29311. Why does the USA not allow coverage of soldiers funerals?
104316. Should lawmakers have medical coverage ?
116759. 5 MONTH BAN ON PRESIDENTIAL COVERAGE! Who's with me?
1028. Veteran Lifetime Medical Coverage
117536. u.k wants to deny health coverage to certain people
126559. Is the media equal and Wright in their coverage?
115155. Where is the media coverage of this absolutely horrific crime???
69562. Does news coverage about something bad that a person has done, constitute 'biased' reporting?
129866. Is the Press fair in the coverage of Sarah Palin and her family?

COMMENTS:
Voted : Once the facts of the story are clear and established, then they should move on
I haven't even turned on the TV today, for fear of coming across this story.

by Truthseeker013 on Thu Apr 19, 07 1:42pm [+]

Voted : Once the facts of the story are clear and established, then they should move on
Great point, audreyanne
by mojo on Thu Apr 19, 07 5:07pm [+]

Voted : As long as people watch, and the ratings are high
I seldom watch tv, but I'm sure that ratings have a lot to do with it.
by skylab on Thu Apr 19, 07 5:40pm [+]

Voted : Minimal
it is horrible for the families to endure. In addition to the tragedy of losing a loved one, they have to put up with the harrassment of the media and seeing this splattered everywhere they turn. These families are deep in grief and need to mourn in the quiet and peace of close friends and each other - not as part of a media spectacle. I hear there is some group that wants to attend the funerals as some sort of protest against colleges - i dunno the details. How can anyone be so insensitive to the pain these families are trying to cope with?
by lightreaper on Thu Apr 19, 07 6:40pm [+]

The main reason why the American mass media (T.V.) blows the coverage of stories such as this so far out of proportion in comparison to their actual significance is that they sell. They sell for many reasons.
- Really the hook is the exploitation of emotions. Our simplest emotions are natural instincts and were crucial in the survival of our species. Fear, anxiety, anger, sorrow, happiness, and love have only changed in the last 150,000-odd years in terms of context and manifestation. The fear, anxiety, and anger which helped us escape or attack threats to our self-preservation sometime supersede reason. The problem today is that our survival mechanisms are often a liability. Now, primal instincts manifest themselves in the context of an artificial world. It's sort of like domesticating a wild animal, the main difference being that this animal isn't the one who invented belief systems or technology.

- Exploitation of social psychology such as group conformity.

- They provide a kind of release or distraction from stories which are more important--(meaning relevant to the lives of more people) and uncomfortable, such as those concerning the 500 people who were killed in Iraq during this past week.

The worst thing about network news is that the viewer receives a steady, deliberate flow of information regulated by the network. If the network attracts enough viewers they can and do manipulate public opinion.
by Applerod on Fri Apr 20, 07 8:24pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved