if you don't see an image, click here.

COMMENTS:
Voted : other, see comment
H*ll NO...Enough targeting the young...

But, RJR was contributing to educational programs at the time encouraging the "under-aged" to not smoke. Wasn't that enough? I just want to hear some discussion about this, that's all. I'm somewhat neutral.

by contragrain on Sun Apr 29, 07 7:26pm [+]

---

Don't you kind of miss him? He looked cool on the pages of the magazines I read at the time. I was in my late 20's and early 30's and didn't smoke as a result.

by contragrain on Sun Apr 29, 07 7:31pm [+]

---

First off Contragrain, excellent ballot question

It is my understanding that RJR had no other choice but to contribute to educational programs to discourage underaged smoking after targeting millions of youths to suck down its toxic nicotine...I wounder how many of those youths who are now adults, died or presently battling cancer as a result of RJR toxic product...

My original response stands, the health and well being of this nation's future is important then a dress up camel to make appear cool while sucking on a cancer stick with a warning label pasted on a 57 chevy

by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Sun Apr 29, 07 7:50pm [+]

---

Voted : No Joe! He's a disgrace to a lovely creature.
Is he more popular than the Marlboro Man?

by skylab on Sun Apr 29, 07 9:45pm [+]

---

Voted : Absolutely, JOE, JOE, BRING BACK JOE!
Hell yeah. Kill the lobbyists.

by passiveson on Sun Apr 29, 07 11:26pm [+]

---

How bout just showing a very sick man and woman so smokers have a much better idea of what the future holds for them if they don't cut back or even better stop smoking or chewing whatever they are using?

by fivenotes on Mon Apr 30, 07 1:11am [+]

---

Voted : other, see comment
Maybe they should have a cute animated character called 'Laryngectomy Man', smoking a cig through the hole in his neck.

by mojo on Mon Apr 30, 07 5:56am [+]

---