result #116773 - AUSTRALIA DEFENDS ANTI-CHILD ABUSE MEASURES

=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

result #116773 - AUSTRALIA DEFENDS ANTI-CHILD ABUSE MEASURES

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

AUSTRALIA DEFENDS ANTI-CHILD ABUSE MEASURES

[+] ballot by aya
ACTIVE Aug 07,2007 - Wed Aug 06, 08

CANBERRA, Australia - The Australian government Tuesday introduced bills in Parliament to fight child sex abuse among Aborigines, in a plan condemned by critics as discriminatory and an attack on indigenous culture.

ADVERTISEMENT

In introducing almost 500 pages of legislation, Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough described Outback Aboriginal communities as "a failed society where law and order and behavior have broken down and where women and children are unsafe."

"Do we respond with more of what we've done in the past or do we radically change direction with an intervention strategy matched to the magnitude of the problem?" Brough told Parliament.

The government plans to seize some of the powers of the Northern Territory government in response to an officially commissioned report that found child abuse was rampant in indigenous communities on Australia's tropical northern frontier.

Under the plan, alcohol and hardcore pornography will be banned from Aboriginal communities and Aborigines will be forced to spend a portion of their welfare checks on essentials such as food.

Child abuse on Aboriginal-owned land in the Northern Territory, covering an area the size of Texas but populated by only 30,000 people, is fueled by alcohol abuse, unemployment, poverty and other factors leading to a breakdown in society, the report found.

Former Federal Court Judge Murray Wilcox said the government has acknowledged the plan is racially discriminatory because a clause in the proposed legislation exempts it from anti-discrimination laws.

Brough said the government was prepared to bypass anti-discrimination legislation "in the interest of saving children."

He also defended the proposed removal of traditional land owners' power to refuse outsiders permission to enter Aboriginal land and for the government to take control over Aboriginal communities through compulsorily acquired five-year leases.

Aboriginal leaders from the Northern Territory came to the national capital of Canberra on Tuesday to lobby the government to delay the legislation, which the government wants passed this week.

A delegation leader, John Ah Kit, told reporters "our culture being smashed to smithereens" by the federal takeover of indigenous communities.

"This is about the beginning of the end of Aboriginal culture; it is in some ways genocide," Ah Kit, a former Northern Territory government minister, said without elaborating.

Brough rejected the genocide accusation as "sad and also offensive" because the intervention was directed at stopping pedophiles.

"You talk about trying to stop that as genocide, you're either very confused or it's very sad circumstances that you're living in," Brough said.

Social justice organization Oxfam Australia said in a report on the draft laws Tuesday that the erosion of Aboriginal control over their land would not curb child abuse and could create years of conflict between black and white Australians.

The opposition Labor Party announced Tuesday that it would support the legislation but would propose amendments, including making the plan subject to anti-discrimination laws.

But the ruling coalition's majorities in both houses of Parliament mean the government is unlikely to need opposition backing.

Hu-WHA?	2
comment	2

Ballot #116773: has 4 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
106555. Child abuse, do you intervene?
117602. What should the penalty be for child abuse?
72992. What should be done to reduce or eliminate child abuse?
94424. Are "Prussian Blue" victims of child abuse?
118323. Should persons convicted of child abuse be sterilized?
112598. If parents smoke in front of children, should that be child abuse?
75032. All this anti-Brit/anti-American/anti-Canadian/etc. CRAP... who wants it to stop?
130368. PALIN Defends $200 Million In Earmarks For Alaska!
69958. BUSH DEFENDS GOVERNMENT PACKAGED NEWS STORIES ...
114162. After 9/11 security measures were made. Why not after shooting sprees?

email this ballot link to friends

COMMENTS:
We have parts of town like that too, but we are just not allowed to talk about it for the sake of political correctness. 017

by _Beelzebubba on Tue Aug 07, 07 11:42am [+]

Voted : Hu-WHA?
Since *when* does protecting your children qualify as "genocide"? If they'd done a better job of protecting the children themselves, IMO, then the federal government need never have intervened. Or am I missing the boat again?

by Truthseeker013 on Tue Aug 07, 07 1:35pm [+]

It seems like a case of benevolent neglect. I know that when Native Americans were forced onto Reservations, they had a great many problems with alcholism and gambling. It seems to stem from government interference and lack of understanding of the indiginous culture. It's really sad it has come to this state of affairs.

by patch22us on Tue Aug 07, 07 3:22pm [+]

Voted : comment
Declaring Martial Law in that province might be more appropriate. Child abuse is serious, and if it runs rampant, then desperate measures might need to be taken. Perhaps the government should give the aboriginal government an ultimatum concerning the use of martial law if their "problem" isn't appropriately addressed.
That having been said, (In reference to the anti-alcohol and pornography clause) We had a similar plan in the states. In Oklahoma it was once illegal to sell alcohol to the Indians.
This is a legally complicated matter. You shouldn't deny alcohol and pornography to one class of people, based upon their ethnicity, and make it available to others; however, if you have convicts of pedophilia, or other crimes which have been determined to have a direct correlation to the person's crime, then you should be able to make it a part of the terms of that person's parole.

Not all alcoholics or users of pornography are pedophiles or sex offenders. Either ban them completely, or wait until someone has committed a crime related to their use. That's just my opinion. I'm sure someone with a better understanding of Australian politics will correct any misconceptions from which I may have spoken.

by contragrain on Tue Aug 07, 07 3:54pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact