COMMENTS:
Voted : Neither combination please, no thanks
Ms Clinton AND Obama are but a passing novelty, one hopes..
We don't want a "novelty" for president, we want a fully capable experienced and dynamic individual to head this nation.. Mr Gore may have filled the bill..
Between now and next year's election let's hope that people will make wise decisions..

Presidential Politics make me nauseous.
It always seems that the BEST candidates is not the one chosen by the party. It's been that way for years now.

by UncleRandy on Mon Nov 05, 07 4:33pm [+]

---

Voted : Clinton/Obama
Although I'd prefer the opposite.

by skylab on Mon Nov 05, 07 8:57pm [+]

---

Voted : Kucinich/Altmire

by _Beelzebubba on Tue Nov 06, 07 8:12am [+]

---

If I could go back in time, then I would choose Truman/LBJ

by UncleMax on Fri Dec 14, 07 8:06am [+]

---

Voted : Neither combination please, no thanks
This would be very amusing! First Woman Glorious Leader, & Revolutionary Leftist Right Hand Man! De Lightful!

by Time4Space on Mon Dec 24, 07 4:14pm [+]

---

Voted : Clinton/Richardson or Obama/Edwards
Hillary wants the top spot she won't accept a runner up position. VPs don't do much Barrack would be made invisible in a Hillary White House. Edwards might take a 2nd banana spot for Barrack it would be a better position to run for President in the future.

by Guest User from [64.12.116.143] on Thu Jan 31, 08 6:16am [+]

---

Voted : Just Obama. No Clinton.
hillary is a political machine!!!!

by Guest User from [192.168.0.7] on Thu Mar 13, 08 10:00am [+]

---

Voted : Neither combination please, no thanks
I am not sure if I voted here but the fueding among them would now hurt them.

by UncleMax on Sat May 10, 08 8:19pm [+]

---

^Okay, I did vote---I forgot but I wonder for whom I voted.

by UncleMax on Sat May 10, 08 8:20pm [+]

---