user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes you sexist PIG!!!!!
I guess I'm sexist for wanting to unwrap her from her pants suit like a christmas morning present that you know is a football already but you're excited to open it anyway because there's something comforting about old leathery skin. Jerk.
Voted : No, not necessarily.
Why is it sexist when a man doesn't back Hillary yet when a women doesn't back Bush or McCain she's doing it for political reasons? What a world...
by seon on Sat Mar 01, 08 11:07pm
[+]
Voted : No, not necessarily.
Absolutely not. Such would be a dimunition of the male's right to free choice witout harassment.
Voted : Not at all.
If it does, then I'm certainly going to be sexist.
Voted : Not at all.
But, as we see, over and over again, it is much easier to spew rhetoric than to positively state facts. Some people always take the easiest way because it does not require them to *shudder* think.
The first comment to this ballot is what most users would expect from her.
Voted : Not at all.
My mom and my two sisters told them that they are NOT voting for Hillary and suggested strongly that I should not vote for Hillary.
This is obviously bothering you as you have posted a comment like this on several ballots including one of mine where it appears you totally missed a joke about John McCain.
There is an undercurrent of sexism at play in why some people don't like Hillary. She's a strong intelligent woman and she doesn't play the expected role that many people think she should. She worked while her child was growing up. She was and has always been active in her husband's political activities. She didn't stay at home and "bake cookies and make tea". This comment which I thought was hilarious was for some reason controversial. Of course, she wanted to be referred to as Hillary Rodham Clinton - for some reason a fatal sin because she dared wanted to use her maiden name. When she became First Lady, she didn't want to play the role of adoring spouse (like Nancy Reagan) or family matron (Barbara Bush). She wanted to have something meaningful to do which she should have - she was very successful in her own right. Of course none of this fits with the stereotype of how a First Lady should act.
Guys will deny it but many are threatened by a strong, decisive and intelligent woman. Some men have trouble with a woman boss especially if it is in a non-traditional field. She can act exactly the same way as a man would in that job but she will be described as a "bitch" or similar.
I have also noticed this campaign, a tinge of sexism in news reporting and especially in news commentary. Reporters and commentators are generally fairly intelligent, so they won't go right out and say something politically incorrect. It is done in code words and more subtly. Hillary will be described in words that make her seem more emotionally variable, "abrasive" (ie, bitchy), aggressive (which won't be used for describing a male candidate), etc. If sexism isn't playing a role then tell me this... why are Hillary's negative ratings so much higher among Republican men than they are among Republican women? There's a gender role and sexism issue at play here.
Voted : Not at all.
B_L and FFD, please do get over yourselves, Nuckinfutz, vote with your principles, it really doesn't matter what others think.
As for the two geniuses of the site, always remember, you two are only a legends in your own minds, bellevue is calling...
Voted : Not at all.
I don't know why anyone would think one equates to the other. People should always vote their mind and not by race, religion, gender or political party. If you're a Democrat and a Black, female Republican is the BEST choice, then vote for her. If you're a Republican and the best candidate is an Asian male Democrat, then vote for him.
FLSD, dude! You know what, never mind.
Your braindead political correctness just for the sake of being politically correct is really getting tiresome. Give it a rest.
Voted : Not at all.
As long as she still makes time to cook dinner and keep the kitchen clean, I can't see any reason to not vote for a woman though. :o)
Voted : Not at all.
So you're either a sexist, a racist or an ageist.
I will not vote fro Hillary Clinton and nobody can change my mind about her.
That does not make me a sexist, No! - That makes me smarter than some of those in the Democratic Party that thought she would be a good choice.
BBC, what are you on about? I specifically did not address the comment to nuckinfutz directly or even to all men. I pointed out the subtle sexism that is present in the campaign. What I said is hardly breaking news or even an original thought. If you actually picked up a newspaper or magazine and READ it, you would see that MUCH has been written about the sexist attitudes that some have. I know its expecting a lot for you to actually be informed and to read.
So, get off your self-righteous and bigoted high horse. There are other people who have opinions in the world. I know its difficult for you to comprehend but more often than not, these people are right and you are wrong.
^ You are such a self righteous idiot FFD, you believe everything you spew, you really should get over your overrated silly arse...
BBC, do you EVER have anything to offer ballots other than vicious attacks on other people?
No, I didn't think so.
Voted : Yes you sexist PIG!!!!!
Support Hillary and you're a racist.
Support Obama and you're a sexist.
Support McCain and you're a Zionist.
Support Nader and you're just plain ƒu¢king apeshit crazy!
It used to bother me, until I realized that it was my ACCUSERS who were suggesting that women shouldn't be powerful and not me.
|
|
