user created polls & quizzes      


yes or no : ethics :
[+] serious ballot by fivenotes

It is not a thing they did themselves but one of their family members.

No 6
Yes 2

Ballot #140092: has 8 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Register to submit comments.
You may still vote without registration.

smile bank:

Don't agree with the result?
would you like to invite others to vote?
Click to send this ballot to your friends!

Would you like this ballot on your website?
Help yourself. you can clip the ballot, and put it on your website. Here's the link to ballot only.

similiar ballots:
75461. Should 'hate crimes' carry the extra penalties over crimes that result in the same outcome?
112333. Should I have the right to deny the holocaust ever happened?
78922. Films about dysfunctional families?
117536. u.k wants to deny health coverage to certain people
72202. Does your families safety over rule freedoms
111254. What words of comfort would you offer to the families?
14811. Why do some people try to deny that US astronauts landed on the moon?
96050. Should western countries deny immigration to muslims....
76303. So Karla Homolka wants to meet her victims' families?
94226. Is it ok to deny medical treatment to somone based on their politics?

Voted : No
kinda like blacks being mad cause they were once enslaved by all races and still have an issue with it

by ABC [+]

Voted : Yes
Some way Some how, they benefited from it. Off with their heads.
Voted : No
But most people will assume you are guilty by association.
Yes, I denied George W. Bush my vote because of the crimes of his Father and his family.

RWS, it's not an assumption, people are guilty by association. Here's a legal example, you are out at a bar with a freind who violently assaults someone as you're leaving. An hour later the Police find you and you get arrested for complicity (a charge like aiding and abetting, rendering criminal assistence, accessory during the fact, failure to report the crime or render assistance when an injury is involved, etc...), because you refuse to give a statement implicating your friend.

Even though you may not have actually commited the crime, you are still guilty by association.

The same is true if you drive to a convienence store and wait in the car while your companion goes in. Unbeknownst to you, your friend boosts a case of beer (or anything for that matter), gets in the car and you drive off. You get pulled over a few blocks away, and guess what? You both get charged with shoplifting.

Guilt by association. Even being ignorant of the facts is not a legitimate legal defense. So my approach is don't associate. That might be considered anti-social behavior, but I know I won't ever catch a social disease. lol

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2010 All Rights Reserved