result #16460 - WAS THE JANET INCIDENT AT THE SUPERBOWL AN ACCIDENT OR NOT?

user ballots

news related :

WAS THE JANET INCIDENT AT THE SUPERBOWL AN ACCIDENT OR NOT?


[+] ballot by Rugulu
created Mon Feb 02, 04
YOu may have not seen it but you all probably know what Timberlake did. Ripped part of Janet's shirt off exposing her to the world. So was it intentional or an accident?

No 490
Yes 154

Ballot #16460: has 644 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:




similiar ballots:
16813. Was the Janet Jackson incident fixed?
65735. Is anyone else still traumatized by seeing Janet Jackson's nipple during the Superbowl last year?
101668. Most Blasphemous incident of all time
29709. Were you ever involved in or did you ever witness an air rage incident?
94986. Do you think the Haditha massacre was a one-time incident?
111398. SuperBowl XLI
114138. "If You were to..." question on the Virginia Tech tragic incident
114288. A Well-Known Incident Covered Up By Our Government ~ March 1948
5465. The Bears will win the next Superbowl
15879. Why do you watch the Superbowl?



email this ballot link to friends

COMMENTS:
One phrase, "publicity stunt"

by GaymanBrian4Christ on Mon Feb 02, 04 11:04am [+]

anything to draw attention away from her child molesting brother.
by TheTruth on Mon Feb 02, 04 11:20am [+]

please only stupid people believe it was an accident
by candycandy on Mon Feb 02, 04 12:44pm [+]

Stupid star crap. You couldn't even see the complete boob. Why is everyone all shocked and up in arms. Usual dam hypocrite prude crap. Publically everyone acts all moral, but behind the scenes everyone is immoral as hell. Dam annoying. Timberlake should have ripped her whole dam costume off for full frontal nudity!
by Universal_President on Mon Feb 02, 04 1:07pm [+]

That was obviously intentional, at an event with that degree of publicity people will always exploit it. Frankly I don't see what the big deal is. This is why I miss Europe, toplessness can be seen in your local newspaper. It's not that they're pervs, it's just not perceived as shocking. It just reminds me of how uptight people are in North America, or at least how uptight they pretend to be. How about Justin though? He ought to be called "happy-hands", it reminder me of the Brit Awards with Kylie.
by Steamboat on Mon Feb 02, 04 2:39pm [+]

Who dat? Little Kim wit da one titty hangin' out?
by Stewie on Mon Feb 02, 04 3:02pm [+]

It's a boob. Oh no. It's not like any of you have never seen one before. What's the big fuss? And it was only one of them. It's good thing the whole rack wasn't shown because the FCC would have probably accused CBS of having WMD.
by Jigsaw on Mon Feb 02, 04 4:20pm [+]

I love it. It's so nice to see the smug, the pretentious and those who consider themselves as "moral"...lambasting what was basically a cheap stunt. It's still okay to show violence, death, war, but the female body remains off-limits. God, what a nation of morons!!!
by AlienProbe on Mon Feb 02, 04 5:05pm [+]

It was PLANNED! When was the last time you ever saw anybody rip of parts of somebody elses clothing just for fun at a big event? What was he trying to do if he wasn't reaching for her bra. Duh! Was it just a coincidence whe was wearing something to cover the nipple? Duh!
by Grapost on Mon Feb 02, 04 5:19pm [+]

I think it was a mix so i just enie menied it but i can tell you she is really hot and that boob just bounced out all perfect and shit
by Atticus on Mon Feb 02, 04 5:21pm [+]

no it was not no accident they both knew what they was doing b-cuz justin said he was sorry if he had insulted anyone."as told on the new" and someone had said during pratice they had not reheash to do that so no one was expecting that to happened.
by sweet_like_candy on Tue Feb 03, 04 9:24am [+]

This is a publicity stunt for sure especially if you put all the evidence together. The words he said, what the choreographer said before the performance saying there was going to be a shocking part, and the fact that she's releasing a new album soon. Let's face it, she's desperate.
by Lizzy on Tue Feb 03, 04 1:43pm [+]

so what, its not like we havn't seen janet jacksons boobs before
by Guest User from [142.22.16.51] on Tue Feb 03, 04 1:46pm [+]

Now there's an inquiry been launched, what a bunch of hyprocites!! Madonna snogged Britney in front of millions of viewers, clearly a lesbian act but no one made such a big issue. What is Americas definition of morality?? I for one am extremely confused.
by Floridagirl on Wed Feb 04, 04 12:40am [+]

Anyone who even bothered to watch a Super Bowl halftime show put on by MTV has serious problems to begin with. It's the guy from *NSYNC and Penny from "Good Times" for Christ's sake.
by Stewie on Wed Feb 04, 04 9:16am [+]

That Janet Jackson is awful. She looks as the characters of the Planet of the Apes!
by Ric on Wed Feb 04, 04 3:47pm [+]

WHO FUCKIN' CARES??? there's bigger issues in the world than Janet Jackson's nasty tits (which have allready probably been seen by a million other people anyway).
by mememe on Thu Feb 05, 04 9:02pm [+]

publicity stunt
by xxxxxxxx on Thu Feb 05, 04 9:45pm [+]

so not an accident
by imcabutloveusboys on Thu Feb 05, 04 10:00pm [+]

who cares i see tits like that in national geographic everyday
by xtalscreams on Fri Feb 06, 04 10:35am [+]

HAHAHA yeah those Bosnian boobies are rockin'. I mean, who wants firm knockers when you can see jugs that hang all the way to their BELT? LOL
by User-Abuser on Fri Feb 06, 04 1:22pm [+]

It wasn't an accident to Janet but was unintended by Justin
by sarah1911 on Fri Feb 06, 04 3:55pm [+]

no comment.
by mr_baggles on Fri Feb 06, 04 8:26pm [+]

obviously not
by blacksheep14 on Sat Feb 07, 04 8:15pm [+]

She has to try something. She to old and to fat to stay on top.
by Orgazmo on Sun Feb 08, 04 12:15pm [+]

Justin is a lair. That crap he had to of had an idea of that crap. That was not just a mishap. I mean he grabed that thing. Why else would he have grabed that area of her body.
by timpate316 on Mon Feb 09, 04 1:03am [+]

JT is an ass, I feel bad for Jan
by Saz on Mon Feb 09, 04 7:21am [+]

of course it was mistake! it was mistake they let another jackson on tv!
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Feb 09, 04 9:18am [+]

It was definitly an accident. Justin Timberlake meant to actually rip off Michael Jacksons clothes off
by Lucky on Mon Feb 09, 04 3:35pm [+]

Janet Reno would've been a better attraction.
by stranger7800 on Tue Feb 10, 04 12:05am [+]

mind your own fuckin business if she wants to rip of her costume let her like you fuckers don't wath porn justin should have ripped his pants off too and showd his dick
by haile on Tue Feb 10, 04 11:14am [+]

I think intentional, because she has a new album coming out and she has alot of competition out there. No one said anything when LiL Kim showed her breast. And also I think she did that so media will leave her brother alone for a minute.
by sexy on Tue Feb 10, 04 3:06pm [+]

Okay let's think about this. Janet was talking BEFORE the superbowl about something extra special that was going to happen. And right after the superbowl Timberlake said that they 'like to give everyone something to talk about.' Now they both deny it. I don't have any respect for liars.
by Jigsaw on Tue Feb 10, 04 4:02pm [+]

My money's on it being a planned thing. Can you say "publicity stunt?" What kind of surprised me was the absurd overreaction so many people had to it. Bet it surprised Janet too. :-)
by Biggus_Dickus on Tue Feb 10, 04 9:09pm [+]

It was an accident. She was wearing the nipple-shield for extra support.
by SomeGuy on Thu Feb 12, 04 9:22am [+]

What an amazing coincidence that the incident happened right before the release of her new album.
by Applerod on Fri Feb 13, 04 12:14am [+]

Maybe Janet was trying to draw attention from Michael for a while.
by LudwigVan on Sat Feb 14, 04 12:29am [+]

Definately not!!! At least not to Janet. At least Justin regretted it. (So he says)
by CrimsonTearz2004 on Mon Feb 16, 04 12:53pm [+]

Hell I thought it looked like a football.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Feb 16, 04 5:13pm [+]

But in the scheme of things, does it really matter?
by Eris_de_Suzerain on Wed Feb 18, 04 2:01pm [+]

No accident.
Lots of publicity.
Lots of feint appologies -
Lies.
Media, once again, selling our kids morals to the highest bidder.
by NoMoreFollowtheLiar on Wed Feb 18, 04 5:24pm [+]

It was no accident, all staged. The response to it is what's really stupid!! It's a bare breast, people!! It's made for infants to suck on!!! go to a friggin museum!! half the statues there are naked!!! GET OVER IT!!!
by SamuraiRick on Wed Feb 18, 04 5:56pm [+]

why r there so many ballots on justin. u people must really like him or u have nothing better to do w. ur time
by jtfanatic71 on Sat Mar 27, 04 1:47pm [+]

I saw it live. I didn't think it was actually her breast 'cause it was so white.
by cptjacksavvy on Wed Sep 01, 04 3:22am [+]

Voted : No
I'm really undecided but why would they do something so risque and cause a bunch of mayhem? Neither one of them needed a career boost so I'm saying no that only a part should have come off.
by piggie8 on Mon Jul 14, 08 12:50am [+]

Wait, you shouldn't put yes or no!!! WTF
by piggie8 on Mon Jul 14, 08 12:51am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved