result #50170 - WHY DO WE CALL PEOPLE THAT SABOTAGE CORPORATIONÂ’S EFFORTS TO DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT ECO-TERRORISTS? ARE NOT THE CORPORATIONS THE ECO-TERRORIST?

user ballots Login Register Add One FAQ/Contact Popular Ballots Recent Popular Recent Votes Best Worst Yes or No Choices What If Prediction Advice Would You Crime Recommend Quiz TV & Movie Music & Radio Political Science Sports Relationship Techonology Culture Philosophy Religion Ethics History Food & Health Fashion & Beauty Crime FanBase Discussion Bug Report

prediction : culture : WHY DO WE CALL PEOPLE THAT SABOTAGE CORPORATION’S EFFORTS TO DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT ECO-TERRORISTS? ARE NOT THE CORPORATIONS THE ECO-TERRORIST? [+] ballot by RobinGaylord created Wed Sep 08, 04 Recently a Super Wal-Mart was vandalized by people against building such a large struture a in the fragile eco-system of my cities forests. They jumped in dump trucks and drove them through the walls that were recently erected. I don’t like Wal-Mart and not just because the massive structure is being built in such a vulnerable area. There are many small businesses around here that are going to go under because of the low quality, cheap, imported merchandise they will sell. I just moved to this area and in the previous town I could only rely on Wal-Mart to buy products for exactly the reason I just brought up. I don’t mind spending more money in this city for the goods I get, the smaller places pay their employees more and thus they can afford to buy the higher quality merchandise their employers sell. I don’t think that this cooperation will do anything positive for this city. In my hometown they ran all the smaller companies out of business and then hired their employees at a decreased pay and now they can only afford to shop at Wal-Mart. It’s a win-win for the corporations and a lose-lose for us and there is nothing we can do to stop it accept not shop there, but there are enough red necks and social degenerates in this city to make sure that despite any protest by the community Wal-Mart won’t lose profits. Even if they did they could afford it till the protests faded. I have digressed. Wal-Mart is destroying the environment here and some radicals have decided to exercises civil disobedience and destroy the cooperation that seeks to destroy the environment. Who is the real ecological terrorist, the corporation that seeks to destroy the forest for profit or the radicals that destroyed the corporation to protect the environment? Wal-Mart 62 The Radicals 5 Ballot #50170: has 67 total votes. invite people to vote on this ballot! Comment: content @ BESTANDWORST.COM smile bank: similiar ballots: 94522. How STUPID are people who believe muslim terrorists DIDN'T destroy the World Trade Center on 9/11? 14893. why do people from england call themself british, never english? people from scotland call themselves scots and people from wales call themselve welsh 94648. A couple of people I know are quick to call others "racists", but then they call others "rednecks" or "inbred". Are they hypocrites? 129272. Should we destroy the assets of rich people to stimulate the economy? 76641. "Terrorists would leave the US alone if the US pulled out" - Interesting, did you know that Canada has more terrorist groups that the US? 80148. Are some people really against the modern "PC" environment because it limits their ability to openly express their hatred and bigotry? 127065. Why do people always call Obama black? 95021. Do you agree with Rep. John Murtha that the Haditha massacre will hurt U.S. efforts in Iraq? 96980. What do you think of people who call Canada "Diet America?" 123073. What do you call people who are obsessed with cell phones? email this ballot link to friends COMMENTS: Hmmm ... good point! by Cathexis on Wed Sep 08, 04 5:03pm [+] Wal-Mart remind me of the Borg from Star Trek. by cretin_slap on Thu Sep 09, 04 4:36am [+] Wow, this is so typical: anyone who shops at walmart is a "red neck and social degenerate." and yet you admit the main reason people go to walmart: it's cheaper! not everyone can afford overpriced boutiques. so it is giving a better product cheaper, which certainly helps people, but doesn't fit into your quaint small-city ideal. "I don’t mind spending more money in this city for the goods I get, the smaller places pay their employees more and thus they can afford to buy the higher quality merchandise their employers sell," you said, and yet not everyone has this option. wow, you are such a stuck up liberal its not even funny. by matt_22 on Sat Sep 11, 04 3:02pm [+] There is a difference between protests and sabotage. Sabatage that does and will claim people lives. They ran a truck through a wall without one concern that someone could have been working in there? sounds like an eco-terrorist to me. by Neonblak on Sun Sep 12, 04 9:08pm [+] Matt 22. Where did your quote about Wal-Mart shoppers being red necks and degenerates come from? It certainly did not come from Robin Gaylord's intro. Nice attempt at a smear, Matt. by cretin_slap on Tue Sep 14, 04 10:54am [+] ^Um cretin_slap, if you actually read it through he did say "red necks and social degenerates" I suggest you read the whole thing before criticizing quotes. by TheGreatLSD on Sun Oct 08, 06 7:18pm [+]