COMMENTS:
They need somebody of his calibre to really riase the tone of the place. Him or Bush or Kerry or Adolf Hitler would really make things at the UN much better.
Bush and Hitler obviously had UN friendly points of view when it comes to population control, eh readers?
Yes, Clinton is a respected man with credibility.
by ABC on Mon Oct 04, 04 11:09am
[+]
Hell yea, Bulletproof!
Sure he would!I mean after all he's a communist sympathizer draft dodging coward who sold America up the river!
islam_hater
2000 - September 6th
"President Bill Clinton told world leaders gathered today in New York that the United Nations needs a rapid deployment force of well-trained and well-equipped soldiers capable of projecting credible force into trouble spots. .... Clintons call for a U.N. rapid deployment force effectively a standing army at the disposal of the United Nations will certainly fuel efforts by Democrats in Congress to deploy 6,000 American soldiers for permanent U.N. service."
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
hahaha, clinton was a horrible president, especially in terms of foreign relations, so why on earth would you want him as the UN leader? That would be like asking Michael Jackson to take over as administrator of the daycare.
It is Secretary General.
|
