COMMENTS:
Clinton's the man; Bush is the can.
Clintons *leadership* led directly to 911. Contrary to popular belief he did nothing create the good economy of the 90s, and he tried his damndest to destroy the military. Really has nothing going for him. Well, he has plenty of great personal qualities that I can respect, but as a leader he can't hack it.
Bushy ignored the same intelligence about Bin Laden, but never will a conservative ever expect that dude ranch cowboy to take responsibility for anything, after all, rules of ethics only apply to Non-Republicans. And Clinton was a prime mover in the economic boom of the 90's, that Bushy's incompetence has now destroyed. And our military spends more than all the rest of the world combined. That's enough. Conservatives would bankrupt this country by funneling all our money to the military, just as the Soviets did.
Crank: clinton had the oppurtunity and 8 years to take out bin laden and al qaeda, he chose not to do so. Bush did not have these oppurtunities. Clinton had nothing to do with the economy, it had everything to do with the .com boom. The economy began to tank before bush took office, look at the numbers. So I guess by your logic clintons incompetence destroyed the economy. And clinton didn't move to simply reduce the size of the army and keep it's effectivness, that would have been much better. Instead he let it rot and stopped funding to basic supply and repair programs and allowed our stockpiles of munitions and spare parts to deplete so he could pretend to have created a surplus.
Funny how the exact opportunity to get Bin Laden coincided with the eight years that Clinton was in office. Funny, too, how the day after Clinton left office it was no longer possible to prevent 9/11. And you need to go look at the economci numbers: the recession started after Bushy took office. Apparently, you are still getting your figures from the Rove News Network, and of course, as in the case of Bushy's failure with Bin Laden, Bushy doesn't have to face any responsibility for the lousy job he did in managing the Bush recession. And as for the budget, the surplus was real, as is the historical deficit that Bushy will leave this country paying off for decades. And the military receives enough money from our hard-earned tax dollars. Let those pampered bureaucrats do what the conservatives howl that other agencies should do: spend more efficiently. Bushy wants to create more massive deficits to keep a bloated, corrupt bureaucracy even more overblown and incompetent than it has ever been. And by the way, has Bushy caught Bin Laden yet? No? That must be Clinton's fault, too.
I wouldn’t vote for any of them, whoever wins the new world order would win.
by seon on Sun Jun 19, 05 8:05pm
[+]
"Bushy wants to create more massive deficits to keep a bloated, corrupt bureaucracy even more overblown and incompetent than it has ever been"
Posted by Cranky
The magnitude of ignorant calumniation in this statement is hardly even worth rebuking. Completely ridiculous, and even more completely obscure. Did you know that Bush wants to round up all of the midgets in the United States and turn them into ground beef Tacos? He is also going to install a "Dump Tax" where you get taxed every time you take a dump at a rate of $3.50 a BM. Pricey indeed. Especially with all of those midget-tacos that you'll be eating.
You really should try a little harder Cranky. You are by far the laziest Bush-basher I have ever seen. It's not that hard to find something that is REAL that you can slight him for. Here, I'll even help you out with some topics: Privatizing Social Security, No Child Left Behind, or just beat the Iraqi dead horse even. Come on man, how about a little effort here!
Clinton, without thinking twice.
In a heartbeat!
Voted : Bill Clinton
Bill is a lot more fun, much better personality, looks better, comes across better, a towering tree with deep roots and Not a mere bush..!
|
