search this site: search the web:

result #70965 - WHICH IS WORSE FOR THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT: THE ADVENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, OR THE USE OF MONEY?

user ballots Login Register Add One FAQ/Contact Popular Ballots Recent Popular Recent Votes Best Worst Yes or No Choices What If Prediction Advice Would You Crime Recommend Quiz TV & Movie Music & Radio Political Science Sports Relationship Techonology Culture Philosophy Religion Ethics History Food & Health Fashion & Beauty Crime FanBase Discussion Bug Report

choices : ethics : WHICH IS WORSE FOR THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT: THE ADVENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, OR THE USE OF MONEY? [+] serious ballot by Applerod created Sun Apr 03, 05 Which is more destructive? Which is worse for humanity? Money 9 Nuclear weapons 6 Other 5 Ballot #70965: has 20 total votes. invite people to vote on this ballot! Comment: content @ BESTANDWORST.COM smile bank: email this ballot link to friends You can also reach this ballot at : http://BestAndWorst.com/v/70965.htm similiar ballots: 59763. Why is the western world in an uproar over Iran obtaining nuclear weapons when Israel (70 UN resolutions against it) has a stockade of nukes? 96315. If Iran did get nuclear weapons, would they give such weapons to terrorists? 89551. Aren't nuclear weapons just the bomb?! 95762. how many nuclear weapons does Israel have? 16472. Which country should not be allowed Nuclear Weapons 77759. What year did Canada get rid of its nuclear weapons? 106817. Would it be OK if India developed nuclear weapons? 111807. is it really such a bad thing if iran has nuclear weapons? 112533. Nuclear weapons: Have they saved us or condemned us? 115980. Israel Has Nuclear Weapons, Should We Invade Them? COMMENTS: I say nuclear weapons in the short term, and money in the long term. by Applerod on Sun Apr 03, 05 6:18pm [+] Yeah what would u rather use....barter? by CletuSlackedJawYokel on Sun Apr 03, 05 6:26pm [+] A large sock filled with horse manure. by Applerod on Sun Apr 03, 05 6:43pm [+] ^That would also be money, if it were accepted. by CletuSlackedJawYokel on Sun Apr 03, 05 7:17pm [+] Good point. by Applerod on Sun Apr 03, 05 8:35pm [+] Money is essential, and nuclear weapons were inevitable, human nature and the laws of physics being what they are. by kingAlfredTheGreat on Sun Apr 03, 05 10:03pm [+] Religion by Quinn_the_Eskimo on Sun Apr 03, 05 11:08pm [+] Money only symbolises the amount of wealth. Use any other system- bartering, etc, and the greed and desire many individuals attach to wealth would still remain. So money itself is not the problem. Nuclear weapons which is purely designed to kill on a very large scale is obviously more concerning than money. by xxxxxxxx on Tue Apr 17, 07 6:55am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |