search this site: search the web:
Millions of web visitors a month. Millions of votes. Join Us!

result #72205 - IS THE WAR ON TERRORISM NO DIFFERENT THAN THE WAR ON DRUGS?

user ballots

choices : political :

IS THE WAR ON TERRORISM NO DIFFERENT THAN THE WAR ON DRUGS?


[+] serious ballot by Liberal_Democrat
created Fri Apr 22, 05
You can never get rid of it, it will always be around, that's why you have to find an alternative to fighting it than militarily. IT CAN'T BE WON. That's my opinion.

So, is the war on terrorism any different than the war on drugs?

Yes it is 5
No it isn't 3
I'm not sure 3

Ballot #72205: has 11 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:



email this ballot link to friends
You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/v/72205.htm



similiar ballots:
34481. NICOTINE and ALCOHOL are drugs: Are you aware of that? Isn't it hypocrisy that some drugs are legal and some aren't?
89131. If the need for oil was suddenly gone, would this lower the incidences of terrorism throughout the world, or would terrorism increase dramatically?
78053. Does fighting terrorism with terrorism or un-ethical actions make you a hypocrite?
73762. Will the War on Terrorism remain a war on Terrorism?
32849. What, if any, drugs are you on RIGHT NOW?
73369. Have You Ever Used Drugs
110472. Which One Do You Think Has Never Tried Drugs?
31564. Who is winning the war on drugs?
43347. When will the government win the war on drugs??
44279. Is the war on drugs unwinnable?

COMMENTS:
Drug activity and terrorism are both behaviors, not enemies that can be defeated. There is no way of preventing people in the future from becoming terrorists and there is no way of preventing people in the future from growing or making more drugs.

by nuckinfutz on Fri Apr 22, 05 9:38pm [+]

I think it's too late for this generation, I mean, not sure anything western powers could do at this point to stop terrorist, if we start changing policies now, may be hope for next generation. But I think too much damage has been done to change view on either side in near future
by larrynelmira on Fri Apr 22, 05 9:42pm [+]

Both are used as justifications for more and more weapons AND restricting freedom.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Fri Apr 22, 05 9:49pm [+]

as for the war on drugs, I think that is a hopeless cause,
by larrynelmira on Fri Apr 22, 05 9:51pm [+]

Not really. Both seek to impose (ineffective) military responses to the symptoms of problems that are ill-suited to being addressed primarily through force.
by Cathexis on Fri Apr 22, 05 9:53pm [+]

First, the war on drugs is actually a war on non-prescribed drugs: the drugs of the poor. There is absolutely no war against the massive use and misuse of prescription drugs by the wealthy. So, it is a smidgen different than the so-called war on terror.

The so-called war on terror is a back door way to line the pockets of the military-industrial establishment.
I mean, think about it: What a silly, sophomoric thing GWB says in "justifying" his war on terrorism: "They hate freedom..." I mean do we believe this nonsense. Just how dumb are we? Noone hates freedom. We may well despise the terrorists and their tactics (and we are all agreed that 9-11 was a despicable act), but must we also accept the mindless justifications of the right in order to seem patriotic? I hope not.

GWB could not have written a better script for his survival as President: 9-11 took him off the hook for the economic slide, and it allowed him to transfer massive wealth to his and V.P. Chaney's favorite companies.

There is some similarity between the wars on drugs and terrorism (the wealthy are exempt from fighting in them, for example)in that both are "justified" with absurd logic, and both are failing.

Thanks for an interesting ballot.
by xxxxxxxx on Fri Apr 22, 05 10:34pm [+]

Or different from the "war" on poverty for that matter?
by robotthinker on Sat Apr 23, 05 5:28pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved