COMMENTS:
also, never really thought of this before, but women, do you resent the fact that the world has mostly been run by men?
(ducks and covers)
I think we would be less sophisticated technologically, and probably wouldnt have reached the moon either.
But i expect our healthcare, and general social well being levels would be higher, and crime would be lower.
Imagine WWII with a load of synchronised, pmt-stressed female leaders!!
Mrs Hitler: "We're going to invade Poland."
Mrs Chamberlain: "Why?"
Mrs Hitler: "Just BECAUSE, OK !!"
Mrs Chamb. "You can't talk to me like that, you bitch! And your arse looks fat in that Dirndl..", etc...
Imagine WWII with a load of synchronised, pmt-stressed female leaders.
Mrs Hitler: "We're going to invade Poland."
Mrs Chamberlain: "Why?"
Mrs Hiler: "Just BECAUSE, OK?"
Mrs Chamb. "You can't talk to me like that, you BITCH! And your arse looks fat in that Dirndl...", etc.
(grr!)
I'm just glad this wasn't a Grapost ballot!
by mojo on Fri Jun 03, 05 3:14pm
[+]
Given that many studies show that women prefer to work through cooperation rather than intimidation and one-upsmanship, I'd have to say yes. Cooperation would've gotten us past a great many crises.
women take charge in many things now!!
without a doubt.
even if all they did was hold bake sales and quilting bees - the world would be a better place!
^ That depends if they behaved like Indira Ghandis rather than Margaret Thatchers...
|
