COMMENTS:
Good question, the war in the Pacific would have lasted alot longer and Russia may have wanted more of Europe. Most likely WW2 would have lasted alot longer.
by ABC on Fri Jun 17, 05 12:11pm
[+]
I agree with abc
Good question, the war in the Pacific would have lasted alot longer and Russia may have wanted more of Europe. Most likely WW2 would have lasted alot longer.
by ABC on Jun 17, 2005
Not really. The war in the pacific probably would've finished earlier, as Japan had been trying repeatedly to offer their surrender, but the USA kept ignoring them until the nukes were ready to be teasted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The war could've been over 2-3 weeks earlier, except that 350,000 civilians wouldn't have been slaughtered by that particular horror weapon.
There probably would've been less wars, but they when they occurred they would've been much more devastating. We probably would;ve alreayd had a 3rd world war and maybe even a 4th world war by now because a conventional war between the west and soviet bloc would've been more likely. The major nations would've all had larger military forces (having nukes has frequently been the excuse to cut down on military expenditure)but the equipment would be generally older as it would be harder to replace the larger amounts to update an entire army when the army if much bigger.
Coldcircuit you flat out lied. We warned the japs, but they did not listen.
|
