result #77077 - SHOULD MICHAEL VICK REALLY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME NASTY SLUT GETTIN' HERPES FROM HIM, AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAVE TO PAY HER FOR BEING A STAR WHORE?

search this site: search the web:

We will have intermittent service this week, due to a server swap.

result #77077 - SHOULD MICHAEL VICK REALLY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME NASTY SLUT GETTIN' HERPES FROM HIM, AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAVE TO PAY HER FOR BEING A STAR WHORE?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

sports : SHOULD MICHAEL VICK REALLY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME NASTY SLUT GETTIN' HERPES FROM HIM, AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAVE TO PAY HER FOR BEING A STAR WHORE?

[+] serious ballot by Freon
created Sun Jul 10, 05

Well hell no.

He should've kept it in his pants	4
I hate whores	3
He should've been smarter w/ his money	0

Ballot #77077: has 7 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

email this ballot link to friends

You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/v/77077.htm

COMMENTS:
I know enough about the NFL to know that the League has all of its players trained in the fine art of avoiding certain sexual sitches, such as the one you've named. Guess that he was too busy counting his millions to pay attention.

by Truthseeker013 on Mon Jul 11, 05 4:45pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |