result #81458 - G.W. BUSH: THE MOST FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN AMERICAN HISTORY?

search this site: search the web:

Whatever this banner said, was also contributed by the users!

result #81458 - G.W. BUSH: THE MOST FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN AMERICAN HISTORY?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1132

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1132

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1132

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1132

prediction : political : G.W. BUSH: THE MOST FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN AMERICAN HISTORY?

[+] ballot by Cathexis
ACTIVE Sep 19,2005 - Fri Mar 07, 08

Yeah, yeah, I know ... dismiss this question as more "Bush Bashing." But, if you look at events, anyone who is a true fiscal conservative or libertarian will find this a question worth pondering.

One unflattering answer to this question comes from Fiscally Conservative commentator Fareed Zakaria:

"Whatever his other accomplishments, Bush will go down in history as the most fiscally irresponsible chief executive in American history. Since 2001, government spending has gone up from $1.86 trillion to $2.48 trillion, a 33 percent rise in four years! Defense and Homeland Security are not the only culprits. Domestic spending is actually up 36 percent in the same period. These figures come from the libertarian Cato Institute's excellent report 'The Grand Old Spending Party,' which explains that 'throughout the past 40 years, most presidents have cut or restrained lower-priority spending to make room for higher-priority spending. What is driving George W. Bush's budget bloat is a reversal of that trend.' To govern is to choose. And Bush has decided not to choose. He wants guns and butter and tax cuts."

So, do you believe that Bush will be remembered as the most fiscally irresponsible chief executive in American history?

Yes	<1%
No: He does not qualify for that title	<1%
No: He deserves it, but it will be whitewashed	<1%
Possibly	<1%

Ballot #81458: has 34 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

email this ballot link to friends

You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/key/G.W._Bush:_The_most_fiscally_irresponsible_chief_executive_in_American_history?

similiar ballots:
131415. Which Bush executive order do you want Obama to repeal first?
102118. Is George W. Bush becoming the Torturer-in-Chief?
92454. What do you think the course of American history would have been if we hadn't won the Mexican-American war of 1846-1848?
101165. Would you trust George W Bush to be commander-in-chief for a war with Iran?
95318. Should Bush add a Department of Population Control to the Cabinet, with Lorena Bobbitt as executive director?
1963. Why was Osama bin Laden allowed to leave the American Hospital in Dubai after meeting with CIA station chief Larry Mitchell from 4-14th July 2001?
125592. Greatest Moments in American History
33290. Whats the biggest LIE told in American History?
112137. Should there be a history month for insecure, American, white males?
96865. George Bush: Great American, bad American, or one of the worst Americans?

COMMENTS:
another crap comment from in_the_rectum. how novel.

bush has done a brilliant job.... of making his rich cronies richer and the poor poorer (or deader).

by scarlet_pin on Tue Sep 20, 05 8:20am [+]

inter_regnum: Exactly teh response I'd expect from someone who was blindly allied to a politician. Ignore the facts, ignotre the situation ... make it all personal.

If he does something stupid, I call him on it. Note that I *always* deal with facts and situations. Thus, in reality, it is an 'Anti-Bush ballot' only so far as it highlights his actions.

And any ballot that doe sthat will, have a high likelihood of being 'Anti-Bush.'

by Cathexis on Tue Sep 20, 05 4:51pm [+]

You NEVER deal in facts.

Case in point your argument is to attack me.

That is an ad hominem attack.

It is not a fact that I am what you say I am.

You simply dismiss anything contrary to YOUR BLINDLY FOLLOWING POLITICAL IDEOLOGY as following an ideological platform.

How is that fact?

And should snarky comments on ballot only be allowed by people like you and those you agree with?

If your hands were clean I would agree with you.

But your hands are filthy.

And if you weren't so politically motivated you wouldn't only put up ballots about how Bush does things wrong.

Hey man, that is your right

as is it my right to point out your idiocy.

smiley faces. I wish I could dot my i's with little hearts.

by xxxxxxxx on Tue Sep 20, 05 8:04pm [+]

Voted : Yes
Yes, but a close call between the two Bushes and Reagan. Those three guys individually ran up more debt than all other presidents combined, and never once submitted a balanced budget to Congress. Clinton submitted eight in eight years.

by The_Dude on Fri Nov 24, 06 11:15am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |