search this site: search the web:

result #84771 - FOR THOSE WHO THOUGHT WE SHOULDN'T GO INTO IRAQ. DO YOU THINK SADDAM WOULD BE OUT OF "POWER" BY NOW IF NOT FOR U.S. & ALLIED FORCES?

user ballots Login Register Add One FAQ/Contact Popular Ballots Recent Popular Recent Votes Best Worst Yes or No Choices What If Prediction Advice Would You Crime Recommend Quiz TV & Movie Music & Radio Political Science Sports Relationship Techonology Culture Philosophy Religion Ethics History Food & Health Fashion & Beauty Crime FanBase Discussion Bug Report

would you : political : FOR THOSE WHO THOUGHT WE SHOULDN'T GO INTO IRAQ. DO YOU THINK SADDAM WOULD BE OUT OF "POWER" BY NOW IF NOT FOR U.S. & ALLIED FORCES? [+] serious ballot by everygirl ACTIVE Dec 20,2005 - Thu Jan 17, 08 I've noticed that even most dems. & libs. disagree with saddams murderous ways, yet oppose the war that de-throned him (so to speak). I wondered, don't you guys get that he would still be there doing his thang, his same murderous, tortouring, mass grave filling thang, if not for the American troops & their allies? Would you rather have him still there? The Iraqi people should have made the decision 5 ^ There is such a thing as a bloodless revolution 3 No , I've never really thought about it 2 Yes, I know he would still be there & I like the idea 0 Yes, & while I don't like the idea it's better than us fighting to free Iraqis 0 I don't care if he hurt or murdered them as long as we don't try to stop him. 0 ^even if it means death for "plotting?" 0 ^kiss my arse! 0 ^ poooo. no way. 0 Ballot #84771: has 10 total votes. invite people to vote on this ballot! content @ BESTANDWORST.COM smile bank: email this ballot link to friends You can also reach this ballot at : http://BestAndWorst.com/v/84771.htm COMMENTS: No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |