result #85370 - SHOULD A SPECIAL COUNSEL BE AUTHORIZED TO LOOK AT POSSIBLE BUSH IMPEACHMENT?

search this site: search the web:

We will have intermittent service this week, due to a server swap.

result #85370 - SHOULD A SPECIAL COUNSEL BE AUTHORIZED TO LOOK AT POSSIBLE BUSH IMPEACHMENT?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1176

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1176

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1176

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1176

political : SHOULD A SPECIAL COUNSEL BE AUTHORIZED TO LOOK AT POSSIBLE BUSH IMPEACHMENT?

[+] serious ballot by Cathexis
ACTIVE Jan 04,2006 - Sun Jun 22, 08

Barron's, the rather rightwing business journal published by the Wall Street Journal, argued in a Dec. 24, 2005 editorial:

"Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment."

"It is important to be clear that an impeachment case, if it comes to that, would not be about wiretapping, or about a possible constitutional right not to be wiretapped. It would be about the power of Congress to set wiretapping rules by law, and it is about the obligation of the president to follow the rules in the acts that he and his predecessors signed into law."

Bush has admitted to breaking federal law. This is a potentially impeachable offense.

That being said, here is the ballot question:

***Should Congress authorize a Special Counsel to look into the matter of possible impeachment proceedings against George W Bush?***

(IMPORTANT: I am not asking if Bush is guilty or whether or not he should be impeached; but whether there is enough evidence to start a Special Counsel investigation.)

Yes: Start an investigation	<1%
No: (explain)	<1%
Undecided	<1%
Other	<1%

Ballot #85370: has 29 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

email this ballot link to friends

You can also reach this ballot at :
http://BestAndWorst.com/v/85370.htm

similiar ballots:
94437. Do you agree with Ann Coulter on the impeachment of President Bush?
38662. Have you written your elected officials to ask for George Bush Jr.'s Impeachment?
92661. Do you think there is a Crude Oil threshold, that when reached, will act as a catalyst to the impeachment of George W. Bush?
127177. Dennis Kucinich Introduces Articles of Impeachment Against President Bush
16528. Should there be an independent counsel to investigate Bush's intentions with Iraq?
77504. Will you vote out your Senators and Congressmen who authorized the war in Iraq?
75955. Lying: Grounds for Impeachment?
131006. Donald Trump wanted impeachment?
94013. What's so special about America?
29562. Did you ever know someone who was put into Special Ed and didn't deserve it?

COMMENTS:
No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |