result #89084 - CONCENTRATED WEALTH VS DEMOCRACY

user ballots


Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1145

Warning: Division by zero in /srv/www/vhosts/bestandworst.com/httpdocs/parts/bwfunctions.php on line 1145
political :

CONCENTRATED WEALTH VS DEMOCRACY


[+] serious ballot by Cathexis
ACTIVE Feb 27,2006 - Mon Jan 28, 08
Former US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once opined:

'You can have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, or Democracy, but you cannot have both.'

Do you believe that 'wealth concentrated in the hands of a few' works against the functionality of Democracy?

Yes: Too much concentration of wealth undermines Democracy <1%
No: Severe concentration of wealth has no appreciable effect on Democracy <1%

Ballot #89084: has 21 total votes.
invite people to vote on this ballot!

Comment:

content @ BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:




similiar ballots:
50973. "We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." Do you agree?
111059. If only America concentrated on Afghanistan
4196. How can you amass wealth with little or no talent?
106595. What percentage of the nations wealth does the top 1% own?
106600. What percentage of wealth did the top 1% own in 1998?
119018. How should I spend this new found wealth?
101683. I wonder what Alex Jones is doing with all his new found wealth?
106615. What percentage of wealth did the bottom 80% own in 1998?
122974. Does the United States have a Soverign Wealth Fund?
94142. You're holding a needle infected with a highly-concentrated version of HIV. Oh look, there's Ann Coulter. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?



email this ballot link to friends

COMMENTS:
No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |  
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved