search this site: search the web:

result #92580 - IF EVERYONE WHO SUPPORTED A WAR WAS REQUIRED TO FIGHT IN THE WAR, WOULD THERE EVER BY ANYMORE WARS?

user ballots Login Register Add One FAQ/Contact Popular Ballots Recent Popular Recent Votes Best Worst Yes or No Choices What If Prediction Advice Would You Crime Recommend Quiz TV & Movie Music & Radio Political Science Sports Relationship Techonology Culture Philosophy Religion Ethics History Food & Health Fashion & Beauty Crime FanBase Discussion Bug Report

political : IF EVERYONE WHO SUPPORTED A WAR WAS REQUIRED TO FIGHT IN THE WAR, WOULD THERE EVER BY ANYMORE WARS? [+] serious ballot by cranky ACTIVE Apr 17,2006 - Sat Jan 10, 09 No 12 Yes 5 Ballot #92580: has 17 total votes. invite people to vote on this ballot! Comment: content @ BESTANDWORST.COM smile bank: if you don't see an image, click here. email this ballot link to friends You can also reach this ballot at : http://BestAndWorst.com/v/92580.htm similiar ballots: 57612. Republicans: Would you ever fight in George W. Bush's wars? 96053. If everyone in the United States was a neo-con, who would fight America's wars? 125065. How can we socially engineer the next generation to willingly fight in wars 94282. Is it ironic, that the majority fight the wars and do the work, yet the few reap all the rewards? 106051. Which shows greater patriotism: joining the Army to fight wars you support, 25396. Wouldn't it be cool if all wars were fought like the "wars" here on BestandWorst? 106131. Star Wars - Which character speaks the first words in Star Wars? 73440. Name the filth and criminals that the ACLU have supported 125628. Should All Americans Who Voted For Or Supported The Iraqi War... 88316. What if the leader you supported (politically) turned out to be guilty of a horrible crime that you couldn't deny? COMMENTS: Ha! by xxxxxxxx on Mon Apr 17, 06 7:27am [+] I'd like to hear herzog's opinion on this one. by DingleDUNG on Mon Apr 17, 06 7:59am [+] Not likely by ABC on Mon Apr 17, 06 8:10am [+] Far fewer, at worst. by Cathexis on Mon Apr 17, 06 8:12am [+] clearly The Stupid would kill each other off.. just don't give them superbig guns- or they'd take the rest of us with them... oh shyt wait, that might happen anyway :p by Jyl on Mon Apr 17, 06 8:38am [+] yes, but they would be lots smaller than they are now. by weebles48 on Mon Apr 17, 06 9:47am [+] After Pearl Harbor was attaked there were lines of men waiting to fight for their country. Women left there homes to go work in the factories building equipment for the military. I for one can not fight to save my life, but if my country needed me I would be there. Women do not go to combat so I would do something.There are plenty of people who would give of themselves for this country. But we live in a country with a bunch of sissys. by hurricane on Mon Apr 17, 06 9:48am [+] __LOVE__ the illustration >> by aplmac on Mon Apr 17, 06 9:48am [+] The world would turn sickeningly peaceful, wouldn't it? by Walken on Mon Apr 17, 06 10:09am [+] We have had that situation before throughout the world, it has never resulted in war being ended. I don't see anything morally wrong with someone supporting the war and not fighting. People are entitled to their opinion and some may not be physically able to serve. That doesn't make them chicken hawks. by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Apr 17, 06 10:17am [+] Fiddle: Those who would serve, but can't, are different than those who cheerlead for war, could serve, but don't. by cranky on Mon Apr 17, 06 10:36am [+] Fiddle: I've never suggested that you are a chickenhawk. by cranky on Mon Apr 17, 06 10:37am [+] I hope that "sickeningly peaceful" part was sarcastic.. but I do suspect lately that very few people would be happy if there were NO war. I'm ashamed of being human. by Jyl on Mon Apr 17, 06 10:46am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |