COMMENTS:
I've only been to Chicago, but I'll say Los Angeles because I like the warm weather.
None, I'm quiet happy in Liverpool. European capitol of culture 2008. :o0
Liverpool owns all the above grrrrr!
** karma **
LA bothers me because of the plasticy stuff, and all the cars and roads, I've been there a couple times and I only like it for visiting. Chicago might be okay, I've been to the airport a lot of times! :D But I'd pick Manhattan, I'd go back to the Village.
by Jyl on Sat Apr 29, 06 7:27am
[+]
I've been to all three, and I'd hang my hat in Chi-town. Sure, the summers are horrid, but I could always live under A/C 24/7. And the thought of snowfall measured in feet rather than inches- *heaven*.
A long time ago I lived in the Chicago suburbs. Although I don't have very pleasant memories of my time there, the city was nice with good museums. Then I lived in NJ -- again, not NYC, but fairly close. I wouldn't mind living in NYC temporarily for the experience, but it's too fast-paced, and NY accents are a bit annoying. I now live in LA. I would probably choose LA because at least I wouldn't have to wear extremely heavy clothes.
Voted : Los Angeles
I'm a film major, so this one's obvious...
|
