both were wrong, but at least the Jews didn't riot: rate this ballot choice

bestandworst.com wants your opinion!.
Please vote on the ballot you see below.
No registration required.

ballot no 87668

WHY ARE ANTI-ISLAMIC CARTOONS CONSIDERED FREEDOM OF SPEECH, WHILE ANTI-SEMETIC CARTOONS ARE CONSIDERED WRONG?

[+] ballot by aya
created Wed Feb 08, 06

What pissed me off about the cartoons is the fact that people were rioting and expecting the Danes to just cave into their demands. While I don't condone the actions of the rioters, is making anti-Islamic cartoons considered freedom of speech? If so, then should anti-Semetic cartoons be considered wrong?

yes, the anti-Islamic cartoons are freedom of speech

both were wrong

both were wrong, but at least the Jews didn't riot

Both are right

No difference between the two

Who say the cartoons were anti Islamic?

Register to submit choices

Ballot #87668 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0

Welcome, You landed on Bestandworst.com!

You searched for the word :

both were wrong, but at least the Jews didn't riot

Vote on the ballot to the left.
:

both were wrong, but at least the Jews didn't riot

This BALLOT CHOICE created by : aya
Submitted on : Feb 08,2006 9:56:47 am