search this site: search the web:
Report due? School work? boss yelling at you? Shirking is good for the soul. Play at Bestandworst.com!

POSSIBLE SCENARIO? IRAN NUKES ISRAEL; U.S. NUKES IRAN.

user ballots

best : political :

POSSIBLE SCENARIO? IRAN NUKES ISRAEL; U.S. NUKES IRAN.


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Sat Aug 05, 06 - Thu Apr 30, 09

Yes
No
Impossible scenario! Iran's nuke - 0 Israel's nukes - thousands?


Ballot #100045 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
59763. Why is the western world in an uproar over Iran obtaining nuclear weapons when Israel (70 UN resolutions against it) has a stockade of nukes?
113200. Is there a possibility that Bush/Cheney will attack Iran with nukes?
97466. Iran warns Israel that if they attack Syria, Iran will 'respond fiercely'?
105258. Israel VS. Iran
99373. Israel VS Lebanon, Syria & Iran
113061. AIPAC, a pro-Israel lobbying group, is promoting a US war with Iran
86012. Should the U.S. start a war with Iran now to prevent a possible war with Iran later?
102882. WOULD THE USA BE CONTEMPLATING INVADING IRAN IF IRAN HAD NO OIL?
112450. Is talking about a possible war with Iran "protecting Iran?"
126946. Would you want your enemy to have nukes?


COMMENTS:
wouldn't it be more likely the other way around, since Israel has nukes, and Iran doesn't.
by Lovelynice on Sat Aug 05, 06 8:18pm [+]

Voted : Yes
Possible scenario. So much so, that Iran would certainly calculate it, and thus not do it. They are emotional windbags with hate, not courage, and they are mouth piece threat-makers only. "All talk and no real action". That's why they support others like Hezbollah, to do all the dirtywork.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Sat Aug 05, 06 8:25pm [+]

Almost like another windbag I could mention... but I wont, too easy a target.
by Steelhamster on Sun Aug 06, 06 4:36am [+]

Iran has NO nukes - just like Iraq had no weapons of mass distraction, get a brain lad's and stop falling for the old PNAC lies.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 06, 06 5:46am [+]

"That's why they support others like Hezbollah, to do all the dirtywork."

You mean how the U.S. is encouraging Israel to do it's dirty work by fighting Hezbollah in Lebanon as a way of collaring Syria and Lebanon? That kind of letting others do their dirty work?
by cranky on Sun Aug 06, 06 8:03am [+]

Iran will get nukes. I have no doubt of that. And the country is being run by "belief-based" religious fundamentalists, who like George Bush, Pat Robertson and the U.S. fundamentalists believe they are on a mission directed by God, and that God will protect them and guarantee the outcome of whatever they do.

I have no problem believing that Iran would, either directly or (more likely) indirectly nuke Israel, believing that it was God's will and that God would protect them from nuclear retaliation.
by cranky on Sun Aug 06, 06 8:10am [+]

The way the USA, UK, and Israel keep invading and attacking other nations on spurious excuses and lies, then it makes perfect sense for ALL NATIONS to get nukes ASAP. But I doubt that Iran is developing any despite the USA's lies.

If they want to bomb some nation because of a nuclear weapons program, why not take on North Korea. Everyone KNOWS that they have nukes. North Korea said so...

I guess the USA is a cowardly bully, they only harass nations that aren't well armed.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 06, 06 8:42am [+]

"The way the USA, UK, and Israel keep invading and attacking other nations on spurious excuses and lies"
by Lovelynice on Aug 06, 2006 8:42am

Excuse me, but as I recall, Israel was minding its own business when Hamas muredered and kidnaped Israeli soldiers, as did Hezbollah.


by Jinn_the_Kafir on Sun Aug 06, 06 9:49am [+]

Voted : No
Let's hope this never happens. If Iran nuked Israel, all hell would break loose. I think it would start the third world war. We are living real close to the edge today.
by margaret123 on Sun Aug 06, 06 11:03am [+]

Your missing the bigger picture Jinn, Lebanon was minding it's own business for over 6000 years when less than fifty years ago the unwanted neighbour moved in.

So historically Israel is the aggressor.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 06, 06 11:17am [+]

"Excuse me, but as I recall, Israel was minding its own business...."

As I recall, Iraq was minding it's own business, too. when the U.S., to make the Middle East safer for Israel, decided to unilaterally invade, on false pretenses, of course.
by cranky on Sun Aug 06, 06 11:32am [+]

Cranky,

1. The cruel dictator Saddam never minded his own business in the Middle East since he came to power. He was a constant menace to his neighbors and a mass-murderer of his own people, even going as far as using WMD's to kill thousands of the ones he didn't like. He ignored the repeated requests of the international community, including those of other Arab states, to comply with the UN resolutions that were implimented after his military forces were driven out of Kuwait. Kuwait was minding its own business when Saddam decided it should became a new province of Iraq.

2. The invasion of Iraq was not about making Israel safer, but it was about making ALL the Middle East safer for everyone, especially Kuwait.

3. The U.S.A did not act unilaterally. The plans to invade Iraq were supported by a Coalition of nearly 50 nations, many of whom sent their own troops and special forces, including and contrary to popular belief Canada.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Sun Aug 06, 06 1:39pm [+]

And Ken from Dublin. How can I respond to someone that clearly proves they have no factual knowledge of Middle East history. You are obviously one those uninformed people that believes the silly tale that Jewish people just suddenly appeared from nowhere and "moved in" fifty years ago. The fact is, there were always thousands of Jews living in that region as they were all through history, before there was an Islam. More started moving there at the turn of the 19th century, just as they came to America, Canada, South America, Australia... And In case you didn't know, there has never in the history of the world been a country called Palestine.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Sun Aug 06, 06 1:56pm [+]

Or Israel for that matter until it was forced upon the region.

Read my post again - I never once mentioned Jews - and are you denying that the state of Israel was founded in 1948?

Or are you going to change history to suit your fiction?
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 06, 06 3:57pm [+]

The invasion of Iraq was not about making Israel safer, but it was about making ALL the Middle East safer for everyone, especially Kuwait.

Jin the Kafir wrote the above if you don't mind!

- he's all concerned about the Islam nations of the middle east all of a sudden

- yet has posted nothing but hate driven racism against Islam and it's followers for as long as he has being posting on this website.

You're just a hypocrite Jinn, and your opinion means NADA, NOTHING, ZERO because of that.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 06, 06 4:03pm [+]

{Excuse me, but as I recall, Israel was minding its own business when Hamas muredered and kidnaped Israeli soldiers, as did Hezbollah.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Aug 06, 2006 9:49am}

Excuse me, but as I recall, Israel was busy slaughtering Palestinians when the IDF sent a platoon of soldiers with a tank across the border into Lebanon, when the platoon got smashed, the tank got smashed, and two Israeli soldiers were CAPTURED. Then Israel decided to lie about it (no surprise there)
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 06, 06 10:10pm [+]

Voted : Yes
It may be impossible at this particular moment in time... But, as soon as Iran has nuclear/atomic weapons... We can expect them to use them... or hand them off to people that will use them. Count on it.
by Guest User from [12.107.138.1] on Mon Aug 07, 06 7:25am [+]

^I fear you are correct.
by cranky on Mon Aug 07, 06 1:22pm [+]

Ken. Some people don't know the meaning of the word racism. Racists spread lies, untruths and unfounded stories and myths about other races. When I speak about Islam, can you prove that I have met this criteria? Can you point out any lies I have said about Islam?

As you do with your conspiracy nonsense, you have again made an erroneous assumtion without factual proof. Do you even know what race or ethnic backgound I come from? No you do not.

My beef is with the ideology of Islam, not Muslims. Islam is a doctrine of hate. And since I am against hate I am against Islam. I can respect the right of someone to call themselves a Nazi, but I will speak against Nazism and its doctrine of hate. Does that make me a racist?

Your problem with me has nothing to do with what I say about Islam. Your comments are merely a red-herring. What you don't like about me is that you know I can see through your tinfoil hat nonsense, and you don't know how to deal with me, except to call me a racist.

By the way, your conspiracy theory is also a doctrine of hate. So don't you think that I'm going anywhere.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Mon Aug 07, 06 3:34pm [+]

"By the way, your conspiracy theory is also a doctrine of hate. So don't you think that I'm going anywhere."

by Jinn_the_Kafir on Aug 07, 2006 3:34pm

Thanks Jinn for that last nonsense sentence that speaks for itself -and you're right I don't think that you're going anywhere. (o:

(least of all with your garbage arguments)
by Ken_from_Dublin on Mon Aug 07, 06 4:04pm [+]

Garbage arguments??? What argument are you talking about delusional tinfoil hat boy?

What is there to argue about? You have your silly little conspiracy theory. So what? Its an existing tinfoil hat theory. Thats all it is, nothing more. Theories are a dime a dozen. No argument from me.

by Jinn_the_Kafir on Mon Aug 07, 06 5:21pm [+]

It's not a tin foil hat conspiracy shill - GEDDIT???

It's FACT and you KNOW it!

You're great at insulting the messenger of these facts - but haven't a shred evidence to present against the documented facts - you LOSE ALL your GARBAGE arguments on the subject.

You are a racist loser, and no one cares about a RACIST'S opinions.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 08, 06 3:03pm [+]

Its a theory kenny boy. That's all it is. T-H-E-O-R-Y, as in assumtion. It's conjecture and speculative guessing based on suspicions. The only fact here is that you have a theory, nothing more. You are a shill for a theory, nothing more.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Tue Aug 08, 06 8:44pm [+]

YOU are the shill, a traitor to America, do your family and friends know what you are up to?

A $12.50 an hour cover-up lie mercenary who pisses on the memories and s**ts on the graves of the victims of 9/11, to earn your miserable buck from your murdering pay masters.

Shame on you, you racist traitor - 9/11 was and is a PNAC inside job and you know it - and shills like you will be exposed for what you are some day, and you better watch out - because you will have to answer for your treachery to all decent patriotic Americans, least of all your family and friends if you have any.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Wed Aug 09, 06 11:33am [+]

Voted : No
It would be more likely that Israel would nuke Iran. Israel has more nukes than any other country in the world.
by Psycho_Frighead on Tue Sep 25, 07 7:45pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved