COMMENTS:
Voted : No limits necessary
Let's just invite Big Brother to set up shop while we're at it...
Uhm, exactly how are you going to enforce limits on the most basic privacy rights. Have big brother make sure someone wears a condom or takes birth control?
Voted : No limits necessary
Er... well... they manage it (to an extent) in China.
I'm totally against it, as I believe would be any decent human being.
Voted : comments
If we are going down this slippery slope, why not qualify parents on DNA, intelligence, conformity, compatibility, and so on? This kind of stuff opens a huge Pandora's box of incredible proportions. Stay out of it I say.
I always love how people vote yes on these types of ballots, but are too cowardly to own up to it.
Voted : No limits necessary
Oh my god, are you saying now that the poor are not entitled to have family's??? So what happens if an affluent parent suddenly becomes poor, will the offspring of such parents be taken away from them and given to people who can afford to keep them???
Voted : No limits necessary
no, it should be based on iq instead. The top 5% should have the next billion babies :D
(Aug 6, 2006 - 6,640,000,000)
by Jyl on Sun Aug 06, 06 4:48pm
[+]
Limits based on income?!?
Any other perks for the rich you want to legislate, while you're at it?
How about voting. Or access to clean water, healthcare, security?
Oh, sorry ... I forgot -- looks as if those last have already been put into effect.
Nature takes care of this. Poverty is a powerful tool.
|
