user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Yes, I believe conspirators conspire to uncover conspiracies whether or not they exist.
I believe there are such things as conspiracy theories, because I know conspiracy theories exist, however that is the one and only "fact" I can confidently apply to them, or the ones on the ballot list.
Voted : No
and don't forget Roswell!
Actually I think there's a lil' tinkle of truth in most of them, it only takes some hints to get people's imaginations going wild.
From now on it wouldn't surprise me a bit to find out that Much Dirtier things are going on than what people imagine.
Why, what if the conspiracies are just silly leaks to distract from something way worse?
Nnaaaaahhhhh, that can't be ;)
by Jyl on Thu Aug 24, 06 7:45pm
[+]
i don't believe anything.
Voted : No
From the angle you are getting at with the ballot choices I would say no.
Oswald shot JFK
We did land on the moon
9-11 was perpetrated by terrorists
Princess Diana's driver f*cked up
Aspartame is not a mind control drug
etc
Conspiracy Theories are created and maintained by people who are too cowardly to join the rest of us in the real world. They want to exist in a fantasy bubble where they are the minority of intelligent individuals who have uncovered the truth.
Truly pathetic.
Voted : 9-11 was an inside job.
Larry Silverstein is a career criminal. Him and his tribe own our government and they did every possible thing they could to cover-up and destroy any evidence of their involvement.
"Conspiracy Theories are created and maintained by people who are too cowardly to join the rest of us in the real world. They want to exist in a fantasy bubble where they are the minority of intelligent individuals who have uncovered the truth.
Truly pathetic."
by widehead ofknowledge
- Truly pathetic to see a gullible guy utterly brainwashed.
WideHead ofKnowledge? -
NarrowMind ofIgnorance would be far far more fitting.
Bankers, politicians and businessmen conspired to foist the federal reserve on America.
"Truly pathetic to see a gullible guy utterly brainwashed."
if you're referring to yourself, bushie, yes.
Bushie?
What's that supposed to mean? You'll be calling me a murderer next - oh I forgot, you've already accused me and others of that several times on this site.
Are you COMPLETELY bonkers?
You are truly stupid, Hell will freeze over before you start making sense neothe1.
"Truly pathetic to see a gullible guy utterly brainwashed.
WideHead ofKnowledge? -
NarrowMind ofIgnorance would be far far more fitting."
by Ken_from_Dublin on Fri Aug 25, 06 2:50pm
Wow.
So, it's ignorant so disregard logic, common sense and the work of hundreds and hundreds of investigators, scientists and engineers?
It's NOT ignorant to build a fantasy story - billed as fact - from demonstrably false premises and twisted evidence?
When you finally come round to the truth we will all be waiting, we wont judge too harshly, it'll just be nice to have another human being on the side of rational thought, science and reality.
So how come none of these engineers you cite has claimed the $1 million reward Jimmy Walter has on offer but has still yet to receive any response to his challenge in exchange for proof that the trade towers' steel structure was broken apart WITHOUT explosives.
Well Wideofthemark?
"Bushie? What's that supposed to mean?"
bush supporter, bush lackey, tool of the bush administration, loyal servant of the far right, what the hell else would it mean?
"So how come none of these engineers you cite has claimed the $1 million reward Jimmy Walter has on offer but has still yet to receive any response to his challenge in exchange for proof that the trade towers' steel structure was broken apart WITHOUT explosives."
because that reward comes with a LIST of CONDITIONS which are IMPOSSIBLE to meet, as they are based on the same FABRICATED calculations you use to DECIEVE us.
The fact remains that it still hasn't been claimed, or even attempted to be claimed and I don't hear any engineers complaining about the very fair conditions attached or of any suing him to get their hands on the cash reward - do you?
13) Entrants must prove how the trade towers steel structure was broken apart without explosives in 8.4 seconds.
it demands that people prove that something that diddn't happen happened. that's dishonest.
the tactics you conservative crazies use never cease to amaze me.
"So how come none of these engineers you cite has claimed the $1 million reward Jimmy Walter has on offer"
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 27, 06 6:21am
"because that reward comes with a LIST of CONDITIONS which are IMPOSSIBLE to meet
by neothe1 on Sun Aug 27, 06 10:24am
"The fact remains that it still hasn't been claimed"
by Ken_from_Dublin on Sun Aug 27, 06 1:08pm
Absolutely priceless.
Well, until you can prove that those collapses were gravity-driven, then the only LOGICAL and SCIENTIFICALLY RATIONAL conclusion is that those were controlled demolitions.
and we know that the firemen found BOMBS in at least one of the buildings;
Video of firemen reporting bombs in WTC 7
"Bomb in the building. Start clearing out"
"What did you say? Secondary device?"
"Bomb in the building, start clearing out"
youtube . com / watch ? v = W53 wdu 8IGlE&NR
Until you silly lot can cite a link, source, and quote from SOMEBODY, ANYBODY, whose mathematical simulation or computer simulation based on the EMPIRICAL DATA (without distortion, deviation, or bullshit fictions) PROVES that there was enough energy for a gravity-driven collapse, then your claim that they were gravity-driven collapses is just BLIND FAITH. Maybe you should just admit that you have no logic backing your side of the debate, register your religion, and move on, and stop trying to convert the rest of us.
|
|
