user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : Now/a long time ago, the time for talk without action has passed
As I understand it, Iran will not have weapons grade plutonium for 4-5 years. So, maybe we have a bit of time before getting all dithered up. I do think the world will have to deal with this problem. No responsible state or person outside of the Islamic world can possibly not understand what is at stake here. Too many irresponsible nations now have nuclear weapons, but I think Iran is in a class by itself. It seems that they want apocalypse now. We need to hope and pray that the ill-advised policies of the Bush Administration hasn't so damaged our national psyche, our reputation in the world, and our will to act that we stand aside while the world slips into nuclear chaos.
I agree. This situation warrants close monitoring. The United States along with Russia, China, et al agree. Iran does not seem to want to talk, so we (the U.S. and other nations) need to sit down and discuss probable and possible outcomes to a very real threat.
Russia and China don't agree with any UNSC resolutions for an embargo or any other kind of punishment of Iran. Both insist that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons
The neocon illogic on this issue is that the U.N. is obliged to parrot the attitudes of the Bushie Administration. This ignores, of course, that the other countries that make up the UN don't always think of themselves as the slaves of the Bushie Administration, especially his soulmate, Vladimir Putin, who is a primary obstacle to UN sanctions on Iran. Although, "Bush Insists Diplomacy First Option In Iran Crisis U.S. President George W. Bush today said diplomacy is the first and most important option in resolving the crisis over Iran's nuclear program." From this propaganda story from Radio Free Europe, it sounds like Bushie and the U.N. may be on the same page after all. Imagine, the neocons and Bushie not being in agreement!
Voted : Now/a long time ago, the time for talk without action has passed
Hmmm, always interesting how cranky slips into the "neocon" thing when some of the HARSHEST criticism of Bush's inaction on Iran comes from Democrats. Democrats who think that Iraq has kept the US from being able to forcefully deal with Iran. Iran (the name means Aryan), who keeps testing the world at every step. Reminds me of another country not too long ago.
Trouble ahead
Of Course FFOL that argument could so easily be used on the US. 9/11 arguably a US government organised attack: Suppression of opposition, if it had not happened then invasions would have been far less acceptable to international community. Action against various countries with resources and a springboard for further attacks against neighbouring countries. Leads to war against Iran and Syria? Reichstag fire, likely a Nazi organised attack: Suppression of opposition, domestic opposition blah blah ... Action against areas and countries with resources and a springboard for further attacks on neighbouring country Leading to WW2 I don't necessarily believe that argument, although it is plausible. Anyway FFOL, I thought you said that coincidences were just a sign of conspiracy theories. Therefore I must conclude that Iran's persuit of nuclear weapons is just a conspiracy theory and as such Iran's official story should not be questioned, you nutjob.
|
|