COMMENTS:
Was it fuel tankers or B2-J stealth bombers?
I'm not buying this smokescreen. How's the weather down there in Langely today, Neo? 
Michael Jackson is pure like...
You aren't fooling anyone neothe1
The B2-J has a limited "tanker" capability which is why they are sometimes refered to as "Tankers"
How typical of you Lovelynice. What typical shill behaviour to muddy the waters by claiming that I am someone else. Prove to me that the B2-J s were not deployed.
The only shill here is you, neothe1, trying the same LYING as always.
You can't even keep your lies straight.
Still no proof Lovelynice. You keep changing the subject. Its amazing how you have morphed into a government Arabs did it shill when someone explains exactly how the scam was pulled. Scared of something?
{You keep changing the subject.
by GrassyKnoll on Tue Aug 29, 06 10:18am}
I haven't changed the subject at all. You're a lying shill, as always, and everything you say sounds EXACTLY like neothe1.
So, hello neothe1, you little lying shill.
You do know that using multiple usernames will get you booted from the site
"Eventually you will wake up from your matrix..."
..by GrassyKnoll on ballot#101114 Tue Aug 29, 06 10:31am
Hello neighbor, I'm neothe1, who are you?
I have been here since Jun 30,2004.
My Motto is "i am a systemic anomaly, inherent to the programming of the matrix"
-From Neothe1's homepage
Fond of your matrix analogies aren't you neothe1/grassyknoll?
this poster uses capitals. and i really can't tell by the ballot if it's sarcasm or not.
yes, i'm fond of my matrix analogies. and somebody's using that. but i only see one here, where's this "matrix" comment from?
why do i not see the phrase "Eventually you will wake up from your matrix..." anywhere on this page except your post, ken? did you forget to post it under that name?
unless you're referring to the one in ballot 101116.
now let me ask you this. when was the last time you heard me make a matrix analogy in conversation? much less so many in the course of a day.
and maybe you cann explain why you said "You use the same Matrix theme as neothe1, too." when grassy had only made 1 such reference at the time you posted that? that hardly constitutes a theme, now does it?
also, grassy has several times used the phrase "PNAC shill", a phrase none but you have used on this site, which consists of an acronym i don't know the meaning of, and a misuse of a word that has no application here except in reference to sockpuppet accounts. a word you also commonly misuse.
this is an attempt to dodge the fact that i proves you were using multiple names. this is another mirror tactic. so you know what happens now.
** karma **
Neothe, in answer to your question it was all a wind up. I thought it might be funny to be a more extreme version of the usual Tin foil hat loser just to show Lovelynice etc just how ludicrous they sound to all the thinking people on this site who have brains and who use them. Maybe it worked. Im not sure. Lovelynice certainly got pissed off when someone was as irrational and inventive with reality as he is. Anyhoo I will surely return when I have thought up some new undiscovered version of the truth.
i welcome you to compare the IP adresses of me, grassy, seon, beauregard, ken, lovely, tank, cold, daughter, and jinn.
grassy, your attempts to frame me with matrix analogies makes your story unlikely.
Neothe1/grassytroll - did you know that talking to yourself is a sign of madness?
well, you're the expert.
(Poison) Well, your NO expert.
certainly not on the subject of shill accounts (that's what that word ACTUALLY means)
Why drag me into this? Anyone is free to look at my IP address or any other data that will show that I am no other user but me. Go right ahead. As Lovelynice offered, check my IP, check my operating system. Check anything you want. I have nothing to hide. Do they? Yes, according to the information I have been given.
Lol first of all the white house wasnt attacked and why would bush sign off that he wants the white house hit. Second our air force wasnt stood down more like we were sneak attacked. Kind of like pearl harbor oh wait didnt we kick japans ass? I dont know where you heard stuff about the b2-j but first of all only so many people can control them so it would be hard to just randomly tell someone you want them to bomb american soil. If a bomber hit that building trust me im pretty sure someone would have seen it being as that there were only how many people walking around and even video taping that day? Even if the U.S was behind it why would they do something like this? Really would you do all that to your own people to invade iraq? Im not against you grassyknoll cause every has there opinions but i say that more people should have been into for the terrorist attacks. What about some north koreans? Everyone pointed to the muslims like we had hard proof they did it. Noone knows what really went down that day and we will probably find out because all the media listens to what bush says to say. Remember hes paying them.
{certainly not on the subject of shill accounts (that's what that word ACTUALLY means)
by neothe1 on Tue Aug 29, 06 2:36pm}
neothe1, YOU are NOT a dictionary or reputable source of the English language.
so check one.
OBVIOUS that you didn't and are just making stuff up.
okay, the wiki page where they discribed sockpuppets as shills appears to have been changed. they no longer make that connection. which means the word has absolutely no application here, as it's a corporate term.
but i've discovered that your tactic is referred to as a strawman sockpuppet:
Another type of sockpuppet is sometimes referred to as a “strawman sockpuppet”. They are created by users with one point of view, but act as though they have an opposing point of view, in order to make that point of view look bad. They will often make poor arguments which their “opponents” can then easily refute. This can allow them to essentially make straw man arguments. Such sockpuppets thus become a personification of the straw man argument which their creators argue against. They often act in an unintelligent or uninformed manner, and may behave in an overtly bigoted manner. The effect is often to obfuscate the debate and prevent a serious discussion of the arguments from each side. Suspicion of such sock puppets is often harder to verify though, as there are often people who naturally behave in such a manner with the same effects.
Typically, the user:
has more knowledge than would be expected of a newcomer regarding the site's methods, rules, and community members;
takes part in similar discussions and has mostly same opinions as the user's main account;
may have the same IP address and/or Internet Service Provider;
sometimes has an account name similar to those of other suspected sockpuppets: for example SollogSockPuppet, SollogSock, SollogHasAPuppet, etc.
Fighting sock puppetry has become more difficult in recent years due to the advent of several new technologies, two key ones being internet proxies and NAT (Network Address Translation)
{okay, the wiki page where they discribed sockpuppets as shills...
by neothe1 on Tue Aug 29, 06 6:56pm}
wikipedia the encyclopedia that any IDIOT can edit.  , yikes.
as usual, when you can't defeat the facts, discredit the source. a right-wing tactic.
as is astroturfing
discredit the source.
by neothe1 on Tue Aug 29, 06 7:58pm
wikipedia is not a creditable source. It's little better than frank's blog
yet we all know if it proved you right it would be nothing short of the word of god.
Also, take a look at
Ballot 104239 by Ken
and watch the movies at truth911 . net
what really happened . com / wtc2_ cutter . html
|
