COMMENTS:
Seriously I am as puzzled as Grassy Knoll here. How is claiming that B2 bombers were used to attack the WTC more or less ridiculous than the claims that demolition charges were used? Both theories have no real, actual evidence. They are both just fantastical stories created and spread by intensly stupid people. Stand by for cut and pastes from the Nut Fudge Tin Foil hat brigade.
Something else I wonder is how often you need to replace your tin foil hats? Do the CIA mind manipulation rays begin to seep through after a few days? What kind of foil is best for blocking messages?
One Im on the subject do you all use the same methodology as Charlie Sheen? He stated that he saw the WTC disaster and "thought" it looked like a demolition and "thought" the planes didnt look like airliners. Somehow this pure speculation turned into a belief system without any science or facts or information of any kind. That is seriously, seriously dumb behaviour.
Awh... you're so full of s**t searchlight! - go take your meds and calm down and start talking sense, you believe everything you are spoonfed and replace that bulb in your searchlight, the one that's in it is obviously pretty dim. (o:
Im thinking of a number between 4 and 7 Ken. Use your amazing abilities (you know you have them) to pick the number out of the air. Dont try to guess. Guess!
I read somewhere once that all you nut fudge tin foil hat losers secretly believe that you are psychic. I read it somewhere and so it must be true. Go on Ken. Dazzle us with your abilities!
I once read somewhere (so it must be true) that all Tin foil hat wearers on this site have fucked up every opportunity in their lives, are unattractive, are anti social, have bad personal hygiene, never get laid, hang around in libraries all day, never sleep at night, only bang away at their keyboards creating layer upon layer of fantasy upon their delusions. Anyhoo I read all this and on the basis of no evidence at all I have decided that it has to be true.
You're LOOOOOSING it Searchlight - BIG TIME! - great to see you go down in flames though, the truth is out there you just need to point your beam at it. (o:
Maybe I am losing it but you lost it years ago old love when you switched your brain into neutral and started feeding prime grade horseshit into the fuel tank.
No seriously you are such a prize buffoon Ken. You cant see how ridiculous you are to other people.
Anyway what happened to the usual cut and paste festival that is the hallmark of your usual reasoned garbage based arguments? Go on .... cut and paste .... you know you want to ...... go on ..... do it.
"Maybe I am losing it..."
by Searchlight 30 seconds ago
Amazing! You stated something honest for once!
Now, 1.... 2.... 3.... instead of attacking the questioner like you always do because you aren't capable of asking a question yourself - start trying to answer the questions - like what happened to WTC 7 searchlight? - let's see what your dim beam picks up there?
Well? WTC 7?
This is the first of many questions so you better get your official tin foil thinking hat on if you're going to answer them. (o:
Ive had more than enough fun laughing at you today Kenny boy. As for WTC7 my advise is to get an education and to get a life. The reason why WTC7 collapsed has already been fully explained by people far more informed than either of us. Their arguments make perfect sense to me. The reason why you are a conspiracy theorist is (a) You are crazy (b) You are mind meltingly stupid (c) Both of the above.
Just as I thought you half-witted idiot, afraid to answer it because you know I will demolish YOU and your silly answer in response.
Try again dim-wit. (o:
C'mon Searchlie -I'm still waiting for you to put your official tin foil thinking hat on to try and answer the question.
Why did the WTC 7 spontaneously collapse into it's own footprint eight hours after the demolition of the twin towers?
What are you afraid of?
I'll go easy on you - promise. (o:
Let me get this straight.
Does the shiny side go on the inside ot the outside? 
"I have read todays arguments between 9/11 conspiracy theorists with a lot of interest"
I tune them out completely. So does 99% of others users here.
by LCD on Tue Aug 29, 06 2:29pm
[+]
As I have stated earlier, arguments about a conspiracy surrounding 9-11 seem silly to me.
{I tune them out completely. So does 99% of others users here.
by LCD on Tue Aug 29, 06 2:29pm}
well, considering that there wasn't any arguments between the 9/11 conspiracy theorists and it was just some newbie account used by neothe1 for playing some sick game....
No Lovelynice, it was not just some newbie account. The fact is, 99% of the users on here are sick of you and your abuse and snide comments and rude remarks and your shouting people down and calling them shills and liars and fools. Truth? We are in fact, all tired of you and your fake aliases. Truth hurts.
"I have read today's arguments between 9/11 conspiracy theorists with a lot of interest"
I tune them out completely. So does 99% of others users here.
by LCD
That's largely the problem with the American populace in general, they 'tune out', and that's why the PNAC perpetrators of the crimes of 9/11 have been getting away with it as long as they have - and believe me - they banked on you 'tuning out'! - as an Irishman it's sad to observe, America is royally f**ked as long as this denial attitude prevails.
By the way Beauregard - you aren't fit to polish Lovelynice's shoes, she is intrinsically honest and doesn't need to stoop to your level of false accusations to cover for the fact that your arguments just don't stand up to cross examination.
^^ Lol! What arguments!? What on earth are you talking about? You're as bad as she is. You miss the point, just like her. So you want people to listen? Then advice Lovelynice to be just that. Lovely and nice! Something she does not do. Besides, butt out! What does this have to dow with you?
My "arguments" as you put it. Show them. I challenged ColdCircuit to do this when she referenced my comments. So, now I challenge you to go and find one single argument of mine that supposedly needs to stand up to cross examination. Go on. Go find them and post them here. You can't, can you? If the arguments you refer to are my comments to Lovelynice and Coldcircuit, then they stand up just fine, since its plain to anyone who can read that users like Lovelynice treat people like garbage.
Now mind your own business. If you want people to listen to you, stop being so arrogant and start treating people with a little respect.
And as for accusations, do you mean like how you and Lovelynice accuse everyone who disagrees with you as a "liar" a "paid shill" a "fool" or other such insults? Seems to me she can't stoop any lower than she already has. Face it. You are in the minority on this issue. Instead of arrogance, maybe try treating people the way you expect the rest of us to treat you. Not a difficult concept, now is it?
Post script, I am waiting for you to go find my comments that supposedly don't stand up to cross examination. Hurry up. We are all waiting. ;)
And what do we see, Beauregard making yet more entire posts that are only for personal attacks.
The mud sticks mostly to the thrower. You're getting messy with all that mud you keep throwing.
Never see him cite any evidence, sources, links, or quotes as he defends the Official Lies by insulting and harrassing anyone who is a 9/11 sceptic.
"Now mind your own business. If you want people to listen to you, stop being so arrogant and start treating people with a little respect."
- Beaureagard
^^^Is that you talking about yourself?
Tch tch, take your meds and calm down, get your official tin foil conspiracy thinking hat on and answer this will you?
Right...
Why did WTC 7 spontaneously collapse into it's own footprint for no apparent reason on the same day as two other monumentally strong skyscrapers (the twin towers) did the on the very same day?
I will cross examine your answer, and when I am done with that, I will put you in the spotlight for some more questions you may have trouble addressing - so I guess you better start hoping your official tin foil thinking cap is wired up correctly. (o:
^ Do you see how absurd you are!? Defending the official lies? Haha! So where are these comments of mine supposedly defending the official lies? Go on. Go get them and post them here. You sound just like Ken did in his comment to me tonight. Hmmm?
So you want evidence? I have given it about you. I have showed your comments that prove you are nasty and not at all civil to people. You want sources and quotes, you have them.
So now, you LIE (as you like to accuse everyone of). So go this second and find those supposed quotes of mine in which I defend the "official lies." Do you see how out of touch with reality you are?
You don't even know my opinions and views on 9/11 do you? No, you don't because I have not really posted any, have I? No. So know it all, go right now and find those comments of mine and I defy you to prove it here an now. (another thing I belive you love to say)
OMG TIN FOIL HATSS!! I never heard of that, that's the funniest thing Ever!
by Jyl on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:01pm
[+]
Feel free to join in Lovelyangel (o:
Right...
Why did WTC 7 spontaneously collapse into it's own footprint for no apparent reason on the same day as two other monumentally strong skyscrapers (the twin towers) did the on the very same day?
I will cross examine your answer, and when I am done with that, I will put you in the spotlight for some more questions you may have trouble addressing - so I guess you better start hoping your official tin foil thinking cap is wired up correctly. (o:
by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 29, 06 7:56pm
You just don't get it, do you? Where did I post any comments about 9/11? Go find them now. Go and find these supposed comments in which I made claims or statements about 9/11. You cannot because there are none, are there? No. So you think you can throw up a question and demand that I answer you? How dare you! Learn some humility man!
My commnents are sensitive to you and your "ilk" because you know that we are all right. That people like Lovelynice and Coldcircuit and even you have the nerve to shout people down if they disagree with you and to treat them like garbage and you think that is okay?
If you want to post 20 ballots a day about 9/1 go right ahead. I could not care less. What I so have a problem with is the way people in those ballots are treated by users like you and Lovelynice. Deal with it. You failed in your attempt to bait me. You want to consider yourself to be the experts? Fine! Who cares! But once you start turing the ballots into an insult-fest, then I do have an issue with it, as I believe most of us do.
So go on now and find those comments. We're waiting with baited breath.
^ Do you see how absurd you are!? Defending the official lies? Haha! So where are these comments of mine supposedly defending the official lies? Go on. Go get them and post them here. You sound just like Ken did in his comment to me tonight. Hmmm?
So you want evidence? I have given it about you. I have showed your comments that prove you are nasty and not at all civil to people. You want sources and quotes, you have them.
So now, you LIE (as you like to accuse everyone of). So go this second and find those supposed quotes of mine in which I defend the "official lies." Do you see how out of touch with reality you are?
You don't even know my opinions and views on 9/11 do you? No, you don't because I have not really posted any, have I? No. So know it all, go right now and find those comments of mine and I defy you to prove it here an now. (another thing I belive you love to say)
by Beauregard
- em, did you not read my my question?
Are you afraid to answer it perhaps?
WTC 7 Beau - where's your tin foil thinking cap when you need it Beau?
{You don't even know my opinions and views on 9/11 do you...by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:00pm}
But we know exactly what you're doing, and which side you are on.
You defend the Official Lies of the Bush Administration and the USA government by making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
It's clear what your doing, by what you do, in every post.
Here's the post and question again beauregard seen as you conveniently missed it first time around;
"Now mind your own business. If you want people to listen to you, stop being so arrogant and start treating people with a little respect."
- Beaureagard
^^^Is that you talking about yourself?
Tch tch, take your meds and calm down, get your official tin foil conspiracy thinking hat on and answer this will you?
Right...
Why did WTC 7 spontaneously collapse into it's own footprint for no apparent reason on the same day as two other monumentally strong skyscrapers (the twin towers) did the on the very same day?
I will cross examine your answer, and when I am done with that, I will put you in the spotlight for some more questions you may have trouble addressing - so I guess you better start hoping your official tin foil thinking cap is wired up correctly. (o:
- gotta go to bed now, so you'll have a whole day to think of an answer Beau, I look forward to it, and be warned - I will be cross examining you and your 'answer' tomorrow.
Goodnight! (o:
You defend the Official Lies of the Bush Administration and the USA government by making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
It's clear what your doing, by what you do, in every post.
by Lovelynice on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:06pm
Oh give me a break. How dare you presume to know what I think or don't think. And can you not understand this? It is YOU who leads the charge in personal attacks. For every single supposed personal attack you claim I make against you, I can go back to that ballot to trace it to a direct response to one of your personal attacks on someone. Again, unless you don't think calling people shill, liar, fool, idiot and other such things is a personal insult? They are.
And Ken, the purpose of this site is that we are all free to comment on ballots if we chose or to simply read and absorb what is being said. Right? Yes. So you may be obsessed with 9/11, but you have no right to shove your views down anyones throat, and that is precisely what you all do. Have your views. Post your sources. Great! But you do not have the right to abuse people who may disagree with you. Honestly, you all treat people like crap.
Why did WTC 7 spontaneously collapse into it's own footprint for no apparent reason on the same day as two other monumentally strong skyscrapers (the twin towers) did the on the very same day?
I will cross examine your answer, and when I am done with that, I will put you in the spotlight for some more questions you may have trouble addressing - so I guess you better start hoping your official tin foil thinking cap is wired up correctly. (o:
- gotta go to bed now, so you'll have a whole day to think of an answer Beau, I look forward to it, and be warned - I will be cross examining you and your 'answer' tomorrow.
Goodnight! (o:
by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:10pm
So you failed to find any existing comments of mine, didn't you? Yep, you did. So now you want to ensanre me into your obsession? Nope. My opinions on what happened on 9/11 are not your business. I feel that I have all the facts and I have come to my own conclusions. Those are not your concern. If you feel differently than I do, fine. Never been an issue with me. Obviously you'r having a hard time accepting the facts as they relate to how you and Lovelynice and ColdCircuit, et al, treat people. Reading through those ballots, I am disgusted.
{Oh give me a break. How dare you presume to know what I think or don't think...
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:10pm}
I'm not. I have no idea what you "think". I'm just pointing out what you do and how that clearly tells everyone which side you're on.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
That tells everyone that you're on the side of the Official Liars.
So what are these? Swee nothings you say to users? There are many more. Don't you see that you are more guilty of what you accuse me of? Don't you see tht I can in fact go to every comment that you say is a personal attack by me on you and find that it was you who made fired off the first salvo either at me or others? I can. You assume things and you think you know my mind and you simply do not. I consider it wrong to treat people this way and I will continue to call you on it. If you want to say they are personal insults against you, then obviously you feel the rules of civility do not apply to you. I can tell you that in fact, they do.
Dumb excuse.by Lovelynice on Mon Aug 21, 06 12:19am
I'm really disgusted with your lying. I guess other people are disgusted with your lying too.
by Lovelynice on Mon Aug 21, 06 1:23pm
Your bullshit excuse about window washers and couriers even recognising what was going on, let alone seeing it, shows up that all you were doing was using them as "filler" for your excuse.
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 3:24pm
No change, Mr Bullshit Lying Shill
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 3:32pm
Great, you were dumb enough to cite wikipedia as a source. Well, the piece of crap online pedia that ANY IDIOT CAN EDIT got it wrong.
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 8:59pm
es, they do exist. You are an ignorant fool.
by Lovelynice on Thu Aug 24, 06 9:57am
Also your BULLSHIT about "didn't fall at freefall speeds" is just a strawman argument, because nobody in this ballot debate has actually said that they did. WE ON THE 9/11 SCEPTICS SIDE HAVE ALL SAID THAT THE BUILDINGS WENT DOWN AT CLOSE TO FREEFALL - NOT AT "FREEFALL".
By trying to pretend that we're saying something which we aren't, you destroy your own credibility.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 25, 06 6:07am
Nobody can trust what you say anyway, as all you do is LIE all the time.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 25, 06 10:43am
Trying to blame Tank_Girl for a post by Ken_from_Dublin only shows that you are so used to lying, that reality is becoming meaningless to you.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 27, 06 9:57pm
{ My opinions on what happened on 9/11 ...
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:14p}
What you claim to be your opinions or not, don't matter as it's always WHAT YOU DO which is what people look at.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
You claim anything you want about your opinions or non-opinions, but it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
{So what are these? Swee nothings you say ...
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:21pm}
I noticed IMMEDIATELY, as others will notice IMMEDIATELY, that you avoided posting those comments in the context of which they were made.
You also avoided giving the ballot numbers, in your effort to HIDE that context.
{you think you know my mind ....
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:21pm}
Please refrain from claiming that I have said anything opposite to which I have said.
As I stated before....
I have no idea what you "think". I'm just pointing out what you do and how that clearly tells everyone which side you're on.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
That tells everyone that you're on the side of the Official Liars.
And I will once again point out that my calling you on the abuse you dish out to people is not a personal attack. You seem to think you should be allowed to scream at people and use snide remarks and insults and that no one should dare question you on it. I suggest you examine your definition of a personal attack. If you are going to attack people and call them "shill," "fool" "idiot" "liar" or other such insults and personal attacks, I and others are going to continue to expose you. You say you want quotes and sources and links. Well, when I post your nasty comments, in fact, I am giving you what you crave. Facts, quotes and links. We can go back and forth all night on this. You need to have the last word. Ultimately, we all have the final word on this issue, since you have succeeded in offending so many on here.
So no I defy you to tell me if the comments you made below, which are just a sampling, are personal attacks or not.
Dumb excuse.by Lovelynice on Mon Aug 21, 06 12:19am
I'm really disgusted with your lying. I guess other people are disgusted with your lying too.
by Lovelynice on Mon Aug 21, 06 1:23pm
Your bullshit excuse about window washers and couriers even recognising what was going on, let alone seeing it, shows up that all you were doing was using them as "filler" for your excuse.
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 3:24pm
No change, Mr Bullshit Lying Shill
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 3:32pm
Great, you were dumb enough to cite wikipedia as a source. Well, the piece of crap online pedia that ANY IDIOT CAN EDIT got it wrong.
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 23, 06 8:59pm
es, they do exist. You are an ignorant fool.
by Lovelynice on Thu Aug 24, 06 9:57am
Also your BULLSHIT about "didn't fall at freefall speeds" is just a strawman argument, because nobody in this ballot debate has actually said that they did. WE ON THE 9/11 SCEPTICS SIDE HAVE ALL SAID THAT THE BUILDINGS WENT DOWN AT CLOSE TO FREEFALL - NOT AT "FREEFALL".
By trying to pretend that we're saying something which we aren't, you destroy your own credibility.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 25, 06 6:07am
Nobody can trust what you say anyway, as all you do is LIE all the time.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 25, 06 10:43am
Trying to blame Tank_Girl for a post by Ken_from_Dublin only shows that you are so used to lying, that reality is becoming meaningless to you.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 27, 06 9:57pm
That tells everyone that you're on the side of the Official Liars.
by Lovelynice on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:29pm
^^ No, it does not. It may tell you that, but then again, I think you are of the mind-set "you are either with us, or against us." Don't use the general "everyone," unless you're sure you know what the majority feel. You don't. If you did, you'd have some humility and admit that you have gone too far, too often. Just some friendly advice.
{And I will once again point out....by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:37pm}
You must have a reading problem.
I noticed IMMEDIATELY, as others will notice IMMEDIATELY, that you have continued to avoid posting those comments in the context of which they were made.
You also AGAIN avoided giving the ballot numbers, in your effort to HIDE that context.
{No, it does not...
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:39pm}
Yes it indeed does.
It's always WHAT YOU DO which is what people look at.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
You claim anything you want, but it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
Actually Lovelynice, this is part of your problem. You have to stop with paranoia. The quotes are on your page for anyone to see. You have this need to try and deflect your own bad behavior by trying to accuse the other of trying to deceive.
Obviously you see the bad in everything. Please try to be rational for a moment. You are making yourself look so bad.
The ballots are easy to find and no, they were not taken out of context. The quotes that are applicable are the ones in which you use snide comments and insults. Who do you think you're fooling? Just like me, anyone can go to your page and search your comments.
Sorry Lovelynice, but you're grasping at straws here.
Here you go. Some examples by you and Ken.
PROOF THAT THE INFAMOUS BIN LADEN 'CONFESSION' VIDEO WAS A US GOVERNMENT FAKE!
serious ballot by Ken_from_Dublin
ACTIVE Sat Jul 08, 06 - Thu Apr 02, 09
Isn't it hilarious how desperately you lie.
Sorry, despite your enthusiasm for your delusional insanity, I will not be a part of it. Neither will the vast majority of people.
by Lovelynice on Tue Jul 11, 06 11:49am
You don't want us to accept any challenge, you want us all to pretend we're blind as you are, and can't tell the difference between MrFatNose and Osama bin Laden.
Unlike you, we aren't PAID to cover up for LIARS and MASS MURDERERS. I wouldn't do the job anyway, because I have more sense than to become a shill like you, whose online posts will one day be used against you.
A government, no matter how big, can not go against tens of millions of people online. The
by Lovelynice on Mon Jul 24, 06 10:33am
Has anyone noticed how this little creep neo the liar hasn't denied anything that Lovelynice accused him and his vile lie mercenary colleagues of, just this zombie like response because they are devoid of any humanity or any human decency.
Lie prostitutes that they are, at least a prostitute has some integrity left because he or she only sells their body - but these fiends sell their SOULS, and all things good and truthful are raped in their name.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Jul 25, 2006 6:29pm
Perhaps you can also enlighten us with tall tales about your job as a shill.
by Lovelynice on Thu Jul 27, 06 10:09am
Neothe1's statement (above)is the sort of thing that a typical shill/troll/plant says when he has no FACTS to counter our natural scepticism about any of the Official Lies of the US government, and would rather just fill a ballot with spam.
Please enlighten us Neothe1 with more displays of your blindness regarding MrFatNose uncanny resemblance to anyone at all EXCEPT Osama bin Laden. This is afterall your insane contention is it not? Did you not waste post after post after post defending the US government's LIES about MrFatNose, claiming that he was Osama bin Laden when it's obvious that he's not.
by Lovelynice on Thu Jul 27, 06 3:36pm
Now, neothe1-the-shill please tell us more of your Official Lies trying to convice everyone that MrFatNose is really Osama bin Laden with an inflatable nose and a shape-changing head.
by Lovelynice on Fri Jul 28, 06 5:56pm
Ah yeah, like someone dropped a bowling ball on your head when you were a kid, you are as a result brain damaged!
As evidenced by your nutter posts all over this website!
by Ken_from_Dublin on Mon Jul 31, 06 8:28pm
neothe1, your claim that your bullshit is proven when it's obvious to everyone that MrFatNose is a different person, and not Osama bin Laden, and that therefore the video was fake is only making you look like an idiot.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 13, 06 3:18pm
{Actually Lovelynice, ...
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:53pm}
Yet again, an ENTIRE POST devoted only to making a personal atttack.
Do you have anything to say, BESIDES making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11 on every 9/11 related ballot?
As I said, it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
You claim anything you want, but it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
by Lovelynice on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:42pm
^^ Ahh, the good ole' victim stance. No one is buying it Lovely. No one and I know not even you. Once again, and I will continue to repeat this, you cannot expect to treat people the way you do and not expect them to call you on it.
Now, go immediately and find where I made personal attacks against you. You cannot. You cannot because once again, you will come out looking bad because I will in fact post the entire ballot thread that will show that you and your "buddies" are the first ones to go on the attack.
You are not so special that you can attack other people and then feign victim status when I or anyone for that matter, expose your abuse. Life just does not work that way.
{ neothe1, your claim that your bullshit is proven when it's obvious to everyone that MrFatNose is a different person, and not Osama bin Laden, and that therefore the video was fake is only making you look like an idiot.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 13, 06 3:18pm
by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:56pm}
Thanks Beauregard, you're great advertising.
With people like you on the side of the Official Liars, we in the 9/11 sceptics will have nothing to worry about. (^^)
Yet again, an ENTIRE POST devoted only to making a personal atttack.
by Lovelynice on Tue Aug 29, 06 8:57pm
The challenge still stands. Please outline for all of us the supposed personal attacks? Why are you having such difficulty in doing that? On all of your posts you shout people down and you scream at them and belittle them and make snide and personal attacks and you challenge them and make demands that they show you links, quotes and sources, yet when you are asked to do so, you don't seem to be able to.
So please right now, show where I attacked you personally and please show my comments that show my feelings and beliefs on 9/11. We're still waiting, just like in that ballot where you said you would post more photographic evidence. Where is that?
Thanks Beauregard, you're great advertising.
With people like you on the side of the Official Liars, we in the 9/11 sceptics will have nothing to worry about. (^^)
by Lovelynice on Tue Aug 29, 06 9:00pm
^^ That is just sad and pathetic. You seem to have to have the last word and this win at all cost mentality. You met your match. You want to put me on the side of "the official liars," go right ahead. I notice how you work in the victim stance once again, only now is the "sceptics" that are the victims. You are your own worst enemy.
Ask yourself this. Why is that no one participates on your ballots? The only one you have on there is Neo. Thats it. Why is that? I know. Do you? I know because many people told me why. Food for thought.
Still waiting for those comments of mine. Whats taking you so long? Having a hard time backing up your claims? Come on. Lets go.
PROOF THAT THE INFAMOUS BIN LADEN 'CONFESSION' VIDEO WAS A US GOVERNMENT FAKE!
serious ballot by Ken_from_Dublin
ACTIVE Sat Jul 08, 06 - Thu Apr 02, 09
Lovely is correct about neothe's comments on that ballot. He lies in almost every post.
Btw, Beauregard, why do you have some of Ken_from_Dublin's posts listed as if implying that Ken_from_Dublin and Lovelynice were the same person; they aren't.
Ken has been here ages, lives in Ireland, and his IP address is unlikely to be anything similar to that of Lovelynice as she lives in Japan somewhere closer to Osaka.
"Please outline for all of us the supposed personal attacks? by Beauregard on Tue Aug 29, 06 9:03pm:
The point that Lovelynice is saying is that your posts are only personal attacks and harrassment of 9-11 sceptics, and nothing else. You have never (so far) cited any facts relevant to a 9-11 ballot debate; you have only harrassed and insulted and made insulting insinuations about 9-11 sceptics. We only have to read your posts, every single one, to see that.
^^ Right and we can argue that on those posts, all we see is the people participating being treated like garbage, right? I'm not just talking about the individuals that supposedly spam a ballot, I'm talking about virtually all participants who question the sceptics being treated like garbage. So are you saying that to be a 9/11 sceptic you must treat anyone who disagrees as dirt? Just curious.
So all I have to say is all we have to do is to read everyone of your posts to see that people who have a differing view are shouted down and insulted with personal attacks and snide remarks. Which came first, the Chicken or the egg?
{ Right and we can argue that on those posts..
by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 3:42am}
Yes, they were in fact parts of arguments which I notice YET AGAIN, that you took OUT OF CONTEXT.
Which makes them meaningless.
I'm sure that I can get more insults out of half a dozen of your posts by taking those comments out of context too. Especially as your ENTIRE POSTS consist almost always ONLY OF PERSONAL ATTACKS.
That's all you do on 9/11 related ballots isn't it? Make personal attacks against 9/11 sceptics, but almost never commenting with any facts relevant to the 9/11 ballot debate that you're posting on.
No Lovely, your double-talk will not work any longer. Nothing was taken out of context. If you're angry that I exposed your hateful words, then don't make them anymore. You said that I was not being clear because I did not show the ballots in which you make your snide and rude comments. So, I did. Now thats still not good enough for you? Nothing is taken out of context because they any one of us can go to your page and click on your comments and in virtually all of them, you are just a nasty person and you treat people like garbage.
That's all you do on 9/11 related ballots isn't it? Make personal attacks against 9/11 sceptics, but almost never commenting with any facts relevant to the 9/11 ballot debate that you're posting on.
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 30, 06 5:35am
^ And once again, you are the one that leads the charge with personal attacks. Why the hell would anyone want to participate in ballots with you? You're just a nasty, snotty person that immediately lashes out like a caged animal at all that have an opposite view to you. Do you really think that everyone should accept your words as gospel? Sorry, does not work that way.
When I went on to those ballots, I noteid 2 thigs. 1). Few people want to bother with you and 2). You treat everyone like crap.
So, yeah, I have an issue with that. Stop treating people like gargbage and everything is fine. Keep it up, and I will post the overwhelming evidence I have. Like I said, 20 users have it already. You need to learn some humility.
{ Nothing was taken out of context
by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 5:43am}
Actually, EVERTHING you just posted is taken out of context.
If you continue to play this game, you'll only look like a fool.
Apparently you don't understand human psychology and social dynamics.
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to? You know, the ones that I was responding to. The actual lies from neothe1 after which I (and others) called him a liar for telling his lies?
You don't post anything in their conext. You're biased.
So now I'm biased and I will look like a fool and I don't understand "human psychology and social dynamics." Sure. Okay.
Why don't you post Neo's comments then? Its not my responsibility to do so. I also do not agree with you. Look this is pathetic at this point.
Lets put it this way. More people than you may realize feel the way I do. Now you're trying to say its Neo that caused all this? BS. Nothing changes the fact that no matter who it is, if they disagree with you, it is you who becomes nasty and makes the snide and inapporpriate comments.
Try to deflate your ego a bit and maybe you can see it. Face it Lovely, you are not a pleasant person. Just look at your new ballot. You have this way about you that offends people. It is not okay to call people "liar" "shill" "moron" "fool" and idiot." That is what you do. In every case we have all looked at, it is you who cannot interact with people in a civil manner. You act arrogant, rude and are extremely offensive.
Its you.
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to? That is the context of mine and other people's posts, so why don't you don't post them?
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to?
The actual lies from neothe1 after which I (and others) called him a liar for telling his lies?
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 30, 06 8:20am
You truly are your own worst enemy. Lies. To you everyone who has a differnet view is a liar or a paid shill or in on some grand conspiracy.
Who do you think you are? Who are you to tell someone they are lying, if in fact, they may truly believe what they are saying is fact and that what you are saying is not? Can you not see that is what you and your buddies do in every single comment and ballot? This is kind of thing you say
"you are a liar and a fool and are a blind idiot."
Instead, if Neo or anyone for that matter posts something you disagree with, you could say "I disagree Neo. The evidence I found leads me to believe that" etc. etc.
You feel that you are right on everything so its a no-win situation dealing with you. In your mind, you are right and your evidence is beyond question, and anyone who has an opposing view, you just insult and dismiss and say they are a shill or a liar or are telling lies.
What that tells everyone is that you are not quite as confident in your "facts" as you like to act.
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to?
by Lovelynice on Wed Aug 30, 06 8:39am
Why don't you? You're trying to pass this off now as if its them. Its not. If you're so sure that public opinion will see it your way, go right ahead and post Neo's comments. In fact, post the entire thread of the ballots. You won't because you, as well as all of us, know that it will show that you are the one that turns snide, rude and insulting first.
Lovely, you think its just Neo? Its not. You are rude to everyone you interact with. Fact. Deal with it. Its what everyone feels.
I notice you have yet to post that photographic evidence in your NIST doctored photo ballot and, you have yet to produce the comments you claim I made about 9/11 and yet to produce a full string of comments that supposedly show you as the victim and Neo as the agressor.
You can't, which is why you have not. What you have done is to make strawman arguments and claims about me supposedly making personal attacks on you, yet when challenged to prove your case, you go immediately silent.
So you want to change my mind and the minds of all B&W users? Go ahead and post all those comments, mine and his, that will supposedly vindicate you.
We're waiting.
I guess that I have to repeat the question;
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to?
{We're waiting.
by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 8:47am}
Yes, we're waiting for you to reveal that you can post comments in their context... you aren't doing it yet.
Why don't you post the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to?
Lovelynice, your tactics don't work with me. I think that makes you nuts. The comments you made are not out of context. If you feel they are, then please, go right ahead and copy and past the entire threads. But! Be prepard to do it with every single ballot you have participated in, because in all such ballots, it is you who gets agressive and rude. Its you who resorts to snide remarks and insults first.
You're really making yourself look bad here.
You think its okay in a debate to use the tactics you use? It is not. There is no winning with you in a debate because anyone who disagrees with you and your first instinct is not to debate with them, its to dismiss them and to insult them and to be just rude and snotty. That is your MO. We all know it.
So I repeat. You feel they were taken out of context? Go right ahead and post the entire threads of those ballots.
Who do you think, besides your "friends" on here (wink, wink) is on your side? What I'm saying to you is what everyone feels.
You cna do this, you want to pretend to be the good guy right, so if you're really the good guy and not a dishonest lying shill who is ONLY making personal attacks then you should have no trouble
posting the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to - afterall, that's what an HONEST person would do.
Just a little reminder of what Beauregard is trying to cover up about neothe1;
neothe1 got caught in outright LIES (again)
In the meantime, Beauregard prefers to engage in personal attacks without citing anything related to the 9/11 ballots that he posts on.
And he still hasn't posted the comments of neothe1 that other people were responding to. That makes him dishonest and biased.
Well, good night Mr Stalker who only makes personal attacks, takes people's comments out of context, and tries very, very, very hard to avoid posting anything that would show up neothe1 as being the lying shill that he is....which means you're one too.
Unless of course, you suddenly display some honesty and start posting neothe1's comments that we we were responding to. You know the ones, where HE LIES and SPAMS the ballots with his thousand+ repeated words of SPAM.
Where neothe1 tells outright lies, like when he LIED again and again and again
neothe1 was in fact caught LYING. That makes neothe1 a LIAR.
Tank_Girl had NOT posted ballot 98784, but neothe1 LIED and stated that she'd said on that ballot that WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded" - well, since she didn't post on that ballot at all, then she OBVIOUSLY didn't say anything of the kind. neothe1 then LIED AGAIN and tried to claim that I had stated WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded", and yet again neothe1 was caught LYING, this time by Meteor7 who pointed out that neothe1 was playing a strawman argument and attempting to misrepresent what I had stated.
But you don't want people to know that, do you?
^ Oh get real. No one is buying your BS and I can tell you're grasping at straws now. You are now trying to narrow the field and say that this is just about Neo. Its not. Why would I care if you have a problem with Neo? I've seen some of his comments and he does have to stop writing words like mirror 50 times in a comment.
But what you are doing is dishonest. You could easily go and post those commentst that will supposedly vindicate you, but you're not. You're not because you know that would mean posting the entire thread of a ballot and that would be very, very long. So instead, you try using one of your usual tactics, which is to discredit the person who is calling you on your BS.
What you do Lovelynice is to shout people down. Anyone who does not see things your way, and your MO is to
1). Call them liars
2). Call them Shills
3). Say they are blind
4). Say that their sources are fake or made up
5). Accuse the person with the opposing view as being part of some grand conspiracy
6). Accuse the person who disagrees with you as being biased, or stupid, or blind
7). Just be generally rude and insulting
Keep back-peddling Lovey but until you are honest and admit that you are the agressor, nothing will change. So go ahead and post the supposed evidence that will show you as the "victim." For someone who demands "quotes, links and sources" you seem hesitant to post those that will supposedly vindicate you.
{Oh get real.
by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 9:33am}
Get real yourself.
neothe1 was in fact caught LYING. That makes neothe1 a LIAR.
Tank_Girl had NOT posted ballot 98784, but neothe1 LIED and stated that she'd said on that ballot that WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded" - well, since she didn't post on that ballot at all, then she OBVIOUSLY didn't say anything of the kind. neothe1 then LIED AGAIN and tried to claim that I had stated WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded", and yet again neothe1 was caught LYING, this time by Meteor7 who pointed out that neothe1 was playing a strawman argument and attempting to misrepresent what I had stated.
and YOU only make personal attacks, take people's comments out of context, and try very, very, very hard to avoid posting anything that would show up neothe1 as being the lying shill that he is
^ Ah, but you are the one that has tried to deflect this and make it seem like its all about Neo. I have been very clear on this. Its not. I'm sure Neo can defend himself.
But what this has shown to all of B&W is that you always fall back to you usual form of abuse. That is to call people liar, call them biases, or a shill, or a moron or some such insults. You're doing it even now in this debate.
You keep saying that I am trying hard to avoid posting anything that would make Neo1 look like a liar? Why should I? You're the one that introduced him as a diversionary tactic to try and deflect off of the real issue, and that is your agressive, nasty, rude and unpleasant demeanor on this site. Its not about Neo, its about you. Since you introduced Neo in as the one that supposedly makes you agressive, I suggest you post the entire threads of said ballots as your defense. How come you won't?
Lets also not forget that you have yet to answer me. Do you or do you not consider it to be a personal attack and an insult to call people, liar, shill, moron and to say they are telling lies and to call them paid shills. So are those personal attacks and insults or not?
Do you or do you not immediately become agressive and rude if someone disagrees with you? These are not difficult questions. Do you or do you not reply to people who have a differing view by using some of the above words? Answer.
Now hurry up and post those ballot threads that will somehow, in your mind, vindicate you.
Oh look, here are just 2. Just 2 mind you.
HOW DUMB IS THE MAN WHO CAN'T RECOGNISE AN EXPLOSIVE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION?
by Lovelynice
ACTIVE Thu Aug 24, 06 - Fri Aug 24, 07
Steeplejack Fred Dibnah would be proud that the
Chimney on the right he felled in Bolton, England would appear on this site.
by isay on Fri Aug 25, 06 2:34am
_________________________
Actually the collapse of the chimney at the top part is due to the angle of which the stack was falling, it gave way, explosives were not used on it as it was felled like you would fell a tree in logging.
To prove my point i was there when the fucking thing was destroyed!!! ARGUMENT OVER.
by isay on Fri Aug 25, 06 2:50am
_________________________
{To prove my point i was there when the fucking thing was destroyed!!! ARGUMENT OVER.
by isay on Fri Aug 25, 06 2:50am}
Not really, because YOU were never there! Little liar who likes to tell stories.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 25, 06 5:27am
^^ Now look at how you respond to Isay.
Here is another of your ballots and the first thing, the first comment you make in the ballot, is to insult Yosi by intimating he is a "paid government shill."
IS IT POSSIBLE TO FIGHT A WAR WITHOUT ATTACKING CIVILIAN FACILITIES, HOMES
serious ballot by Lovelynice
ACTIVE Fri Aug 04, 06 - Sat Aug 04, 07
comments:
I'm sure Yosi will be here soon as his precious job calls for it, but it seems to that Israel has already done a mighty effective job of destroying Lebanon’s infrastructure. I guess the 60 bridges and 70 roads destroyed, the taking out of Beirut’s airport, the destruction of power plants, the fuel tanks and gas stations bombed, the food warehouses, dams, schools, television and radio stations, churches, mosques, hospitals, ambulances, and the thousands and thousands of homes targeted and destroyed are not, according to the Israelis, part of Lebanon’s critical infrastructure. I don't why they think targeting ambulances (aiming exactly at the red cross on the roof) is vital to winning a war either.
by Lovelynice on Fri Aug 04, 06 7:04am
Your turn. Go find those ballots and comments that will vindicate you. Go on.
It's patently obvious that Beauregard and Searchlight are one and the same - Searchlight's dim beam flickered out when I challenged him to explain the David Copperfield demolition of WTC 7 - only to be replaced soon afterwards by Beauregard, the prose and grammar are the same too.
And both these users seem to be particularly obsessed with stalking and attacking Lovelyniceon a personal level, resorting to this immoral, bullying and cowardly behaviour because he can't get the better of her in any argument on 9/11 because Lovelynice knows her facts, has done her research, and has yet to lose any argument on the subject of 9/111 - and do you know why?
Because you cannot defeat the TRUTH - it ALWAYS prevails.
It's patently obvious that Beauregard and Searchlight are one and the same - Searchlight's dim beam flickered out when I challenged him to explain the David Copperfield demolition of WTC 7 - only to be replaced soon afterwards by Beauregard, the prose and grammar are the same too.
And both these users seem to be particularly obsessed with stalking and attacking Lovelynice on a personal level, resorting to this immoral, bullying and cowardly behaviour because he can't get the better of her in any argument on 9/11 because Lovelynice knows her facts, has done her research, and has yet to lose any argument on the subject of 9/11 - and do you know why?
Because you cannot defeat the TRUTH - it ALWAYS prevails.
Well, you'd be wrong. Now how come when users, and that is most of them, say that you are aliases, you get all worked up and deny, deny, deny. Then you turn right around and accuse others of being aliases? Hypocrit? I think so.
And until you open your eyes, like you seem to tell everyone else to do, then it is you who is blind.
Now maybe you are intelligent enough to understand this. Lovelynice attacks people on a personal level all the time. My focus is not on her or your 9/11 views and I've made that quite clear. You ask everyone to consider your views, yet you yourself are incapable of keeping your minds open. So the fact is, Lovelynice is the one attacking people and none of my comments to her have been about 9/11. Do I need to repeat that for you? They have been about the way she, and now you, treat people. Can you understand that? So I challenge you to answer this. Is calling people "liar" "shill" "moron" and other such names personal attacks? Your reply will tell a great deal about you. They are in fact, personal attacks and they are the type that are seen all over your ballots and throughout her comments. Instead of accepting that other people may feel they have the facts, your/her first reaction to anyone who disagrees with you/her is to lash out and insult with snide and rude remarks. Fact. They are all over this site for all of us to see. And we have all seen them.
Think what you want about 9/11, but then take your own advice and allow others to have their views. If you disagree, you can do so without being obnoxious and rude. Can't you?
And as for me being Searhlight. No. In fact, when Lovely was accused of being you and ColdCircuit, she said anyone can ask LCD. Ditto. Feel free to ask him to check my IP. I think you'll find you are quite wrong and will have confirmed that I am just plain ole' lovable me.
By the way, I'm still waiting for you and Lovely to go find those comments of mine that are supposedly about 9/11 and supposedly prove I am a defender of the offical lies. (which by the way, smacks of conspiracy theory and sounds like somethng out of a B movie)
{Ah, but you are the one that has tried to deflect this and make it seem like its all about Neo. by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 9:52am}
There you go again, pretending that neothe1 is a movie hero. He's not.
Also, if you were unbiased then you would post those comments in their context - such as in the ballot about the fake Osama video, you'd post neothe1's LIES that others were responding to.
It's OBVIOUS that you are only engaging in more of your personal attacks without any evidence. Taking comments out of their context makes them meaningless, and thata is what you have done. The more you do it, the more OBVIOUS your bias has become, destroying your own credibility.
As I said before to YOU in all your guises, it's always the person throwing the mud that gets the most on them. You apparently don't believe this fact of human psychology, well then that's your problem. It's why most people don't trust the shills claims. Shills like you (as you OBVIOUSLY are) spend so much effort on making personal attacks without citing any sources, links, quotes, or FACTS relevant to the ballot debates which you are posting on when related to 9/11, that you lose all credibility on them.
Go ahead and leep doing it, if you like, and people like me with lot more brains and a lot more understanding of human nature and debate will laugh at you.
I base what I state on scientific studies....but you are a typical ignorant shill of very average intelligence. When given advice on how to debate, your own arrogance and despise of your enemy makes you stupid.
So go ahead, keep throwing the mud, it's all the better for me, since most of it is sticking to you.
You're also making neothe1 look even worse now, because as most people will imagine his statements must've been TRULY AWFUL since you don't post them.
The factis, they are truly awful. He tells LIES. He go t caught LYING on many occassions. That makes neothe1 a LIAR.
Tank_Girl had NOT posted ballot 98784, but neothe1 LIED and stated that she'd said on that ballot that WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded" - well, since she didn't post on that ballot at all, then she OBVIOUSLY didn't say anything of the kind. neothe1 then LIED AGAIN and tried to claim that I had stated WTC 1 and WTC 2 had "imploded", and yet again neothe1 was caught LYING, this time by Meteor7 who pointed out that neothe1 was playing a strawman argument and attempting to misrepresent what I had stated.
and YOU has you only make personal attacks, take people's comments out of context, and try very, very, very hard to avoid posting anything that would show up neothe1 as being the lying shill that he is...have begun to show just how TRULY MUCH OF A LIAR neothe1 is, and how blatantly DISHONEST you are.
{prove I am a defender of the offical lies...by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 2:22pm}
It's always WHAT YOU DO which is what people look at. You've proven what you are many times.
You are continually making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11
You claim anything you want, but it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
{Lovelynice attacks people on a personal level
by Beauregard on Wed Aug 30, 06 2:18pm}
I've never said that I didn't, I don't devote entire paragraphs to strings of insults like you, Searchlight, Meggiddodawn, and whatever other aliases that you use.
However, as you well know, YOU devote an ENTIRE POST of several sentences (or several paragraphs) only to making personal atttacks.
Do you have anything to say, BESIDES making personal attacks, insults, harrassment, use of ad hominems, lying insinnuations, and every other possible form of abuse against those of us who are 9/11 sceptics who doubt the Official Lies about 9/11 on every 9/11 related ballot?
Maybe you can learn to cite FACTS supported by sources, links, quotes, and actually debate the subject of a 9/11 ballot without engaging ONLY IN PERSONAL ATTACKS, but since you've spent 99% of your posts ONLY making personal attacks, it shows that YOU HAVE NO FACTS on your side.
As I said, it's WHAT YOU DO which tells everyone that you defend the Official Lies.
and you're avoidance of posting cited FACTS supported by sources, links, quotes, and actually debate the subject of a 9/11 ballot instead of only making PERSONAL ATTACKS shows to everyone that you are desperate, and losing the 9/11 debate.
{It's patently obvious that Beauregard and Searchlight are one and the same - Searchlight's dim beam flickered out when I challenged him to explain the David Copperfield demolition of WTC 7 - only to be replaced soon afterwards by Beauregard, the prose and grammar are the same too.
And both these users seem to be particularly obsessed with stalking and attacking Lovelynice on a personal level, resorting to this immoral, bullying and cowardly behaviour because he can't get the better of her in any argument on 9/11 because Lovelynice knows her facts, has done her research, and has yet to lose any argument on the subject of 9/111 - and do you know why?
Because you cannot defeat the TRUTH - it ALWAYS prevails.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Wed Aug 30, 06 11:07am}
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've also noticed that Searchlight/Beauregard use the same tactics in debate, they devote entire posts often a paragraph or more, only to making personal attacks and almost never cite FACTS supported by sources, links, quotes, and actually debate the subject of a 9/11 ballot without engaging ONLY IN PERSONAL ATTACKS.
I suppose the FACTS ARE NOT ON THEIR SIDE, otherwise they'd post them instead.
^^ Oh for heaven's sake! About 4 users sent me evidence that you are in fact, ColdCircuit and most likely Tank_Girl. Good golly woman! Those in glass houses.
Okay. Thats it. I will post that evidence and humilate you like you deserve to be humiliated. I warned you. Gooooood luck!
Don't forget, those same four users also claimed that Blackcat06, Daughter_of_Khitai, Ken_from_Dublin, Big_Monkey_Nuts, and Scarlet_Pin, and I can't remember the entire list.
^ How would you know who the 4 users are? You make assumptions.
The same users who always make those claims, who else?
They've been making those claims for years, and it's never made their claims true.
They've claimed me to be large numbers of different people.
It's the sort of allegation that is made by someone who has multiple usernames, and can't argue with facts in a debate. Like you. You make this claim to distract from the fact that you have not been able to provide facts for debate, or that those claims of yours have not stood against the facts provided.
You people are desperate, and it shows.
Voted : Lovelynice is about 5 other users. A fake and a shill
Holy crap, it's been nearly five years!! Do you think a tin foil hat gets a severe build up of sweat and dirt inside of it, and gets really smelly?
I actually tend to agree with LCD about all of this 9/11 conspiracy crap. I've ignored it lately because it's just like someone trying to shove 10 lbs of poop into a 5 lb sack. Who wants to deal with that?
In other words, just a roundabout way of saying you feel more comfortable burying your head in the sand and hope it will all go away!
Well we are all f**ked if we do that, get a back bone and start questioning instead of meekly accepting all the 9/11 nonsense you have been spoon fed Jappy other wise I'll be tempted to say tou were a ten pound poop that came out of a five pound sack yourself! - but I won't cos deep down I know you're a nice guy, about six feet down. (joking) (o:
the "Arabs Did It" 9/11 conspiracy theory pushed by the USA government and by their shills on message boards is the worst kind of cod pseudo science.
Most people are smart enough to recognise controlled demolitions (like WTC 7 in particular) when they see it. Most people know that no steel-framed hi-rise has ever suffered total collapse due to fire, and when steel-framed hi-rises collapses, it's NEVER straight down into their own footprint at near freefall except with controlled demolitions.
Most people are also smart enough to realise that cellphones can't make successful calls from passenger planes flying six miles up at over 450mph, and therefore the alleged cellphone calls were all FAKE.
Now real physics has shown that the total collapse of those buildings was impossible without controlled demolition. NIST by the way has now completely denied the "pancake collapse theory" that was promoted by NOVA/Eagar. Which sort of leaves them with NO EXPLANATION. It's a fact that nobody has succeeded in simulating those collapses with the empirical data, except as controlled demolitions. It's a fact that NIST couldn't simulate the collapses either, but gave up because in their worst case scenario the buildings still wouldn't collapse with the empirical data, but instead NIST filled out their reports with assumptions because they couldn't simulate it. It's a fact that a group of Chinese engineers with a $50 million dollar budget (more than double NIST's budget for the investigation) were only able to get the buildings in their simulation of the Twin Towers to collapse by weakening the steel in the simulation to UNREALISTIC levels - and that even then, the collapse took 90+ seconds.
|
