user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : No
Conceivably, he *could*, but he would have to make some sort of drastic turnaround with his policies and their success.
Voted : No
He has never truly won... it was all 'slight of hand'!
by MO_ on Mon Sep 04, 06 6:18pm
[+]
some holy/fearful dregs would vote for a warlord/biblebeater no matter what. But we might be movin' on into The Future now y'all
by Jyl on Mon Sep 04, 06 6:30pm
[+]
Voted : No
I don't think so, but he would probably still garner a sizeable portion of the vote, which is scary.
Bush Bashers, have you ever considered the fact that Bush won both times because of the pathetic candidates he opposed?
Probably not. If the dems ran another dud then maybe.
Why is any ballot about GWB considered Bush bashing. Is commentary about the current incumbent a taboo subject? Will the next president be ignored too, especially if he is a Democrat? I doubt it.
I fail to see how this qualifies as "Bush-bashing." :O
of course he would.. look what he would be up against.
no, but then again, he diddn't the last 2 times either, so he would get into office anyway.
He'd win. It really doesn't matter who wins. Because our foreign policy (both democrats and republicans agree on it) sucks.
Whether it is George Bush or a democrat, America is in trouble because of our foreign policy.
|
|