user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : Don't decide. forcing robbers to pick, and all take your chances on fate.
I'd refuse to be complicit in their acts. If they kill someone, it is there 'wrong.' If I participate in any way, I risk being complicit, myself.
--> their 'wrong' Homonyms hate Freedom!
Voted : Don't decide. forcing robbers to pick, and all take your chances on fate.
Push the wrong buttons on a nutjob, and he's likely to go bonus round and take everyone.
depends on the situation, and more importantly, where the nearest robber is stannding.
Hypothetical situations lend themselves to fantasy. It's becomes very easy to talk about "complicit" and "participation."
Attacking the robbers seems the best course. Remember, you are the only thing keeping the robbers from being rushed by the police. They need you. If you rush them, some one of you, or more, may get shot, but I'm guessing being rushed will confuse the robbers, and they won't shoot many because they will be overwhelmed. I think it a good possibility that if they are surprised by a scenario they couldn't anticipate, that they will be paralyzed long enough to allow the rush to succeed.
margaret: If I knew the end result would be death for all of us, I'd agree. But I'll also say I'd be unwilling to leave a widow behind just so the robbers could be apprehended.
Voted : Don't decide. forcing robbers to pick, and all take your chances on fate.
Maybe this'll make some time if not anger them more but desperate times cause for desperate measures. The others are just insane except for offer yourself but only if there are elders at risk.
|
|