user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
One thing I can tell you is that I would swap George Bush for Tony Blair at the drop of a hat.
Tony Blair has been a great friend to the United States, and he's a pretty terrific public speaker to boot.
Why would you want to switch Blair with Bush margaret? Under Blair's watch Britain suffered one of it's most deadly attacks by terrorist.
Mr.Corrupt: Terrorism can be slowed but not prevented by Democratic nations. England has a long history of an open door policy for residents of the Commonwealth nations, many of whom are Islamic and replete with potential terrorists. I would not judge Blair on this demension. I judge him highly intelligent, well-spoken, sophisticated, diplomatic, well-mannered, and a true leader -- all of which President Bush lacks.
"Under Blair's watch Britain suffered one of it's most deadly attacks by terrorist." Under Bush's watch the U.S. suffered it's MOST deadly attack by terrorists.
"Under Blair's watch Britain suffered one of its most deadly attacks by terrorists." Corrupt: as did the U.S. under Bush.
by mojo on Thu Sep 07, 06 6:01pm
[+]
cranky, you truly are ridiculous.
Jappy: It's too bad the truth threatens your beliefs.
Sad day for the US when he leaves
Voted : He should persuade Bush to resign, too
How ironic ... Bush is responsible for regime change in yet another country!
^ Yeah, I know ... Jay Leno said it first. It's still funny. And oh, so true!
THE LAST DAYS OF TONY BLAIR.... Can't wait, hope it's next week Personally.
by isay on Fri Sep 08, 06 10:58am
[+]
mojo and cranky while it is true that under Bush's watch America suffered it's worst case of terrorism you really can't lay too much blame on Bush because he was only in office for a few months.Tony Blair on the other hand was in office years before the London attacks and had plenty of time to prevent it.
What? He can't afford it? For God's sake, man, you're on television every day,man!
|
|