user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
On the face of it, no. However, I think all of us can imagine a hypothetical situation where we would agree that it should be used. My example: One member of a terrorist gang planning to detonate a nuclear bomb in New York is captured. He knows where the bomb is, but he won't talk. Do we torture him, or not. I know this is an extreme hypothetical, but there it is.
Voted : No, the rule of law must be a foundation principle of civilized behavior, even relative to security
Amen to this.
Voted : No, the rule of law must be a foundation principle of civilized behavior, even relative to security
Absolutely not. Not under any circumstances. To do so means that we are a nation of words only and that we do not feel the need to back them up with actions. It is an outrage for the United States, under the total mismanagement of George W. Bush, to ever kidnap or torture anyone. Not acceptable ever.
Voted : No, the rule of law must be a foundation principle of civilized behavior, even relative to security
It would be wrong. And torture doesn't yield reliable information. And it could backfire and be used against U. S. soldiers.
And we already sent an innocent person from Canada to Syria to be tortured. Oops.
Voted : No, the rule of law must be a foundation principle of civilized behavior, even relative to security
No. I can think of no scenarios where that would be justified.
Mr. Cathexis: Are your really that naive? What principle supercedes survival? You really think that torturing someone who knew the location of an armed and ticking atomic device in a large city would be wrong? Pardon me, sir, but that seems most absurd. If you would give your own life to save millions (and I think most of us would), how can you not torture one to get information that would save these same millions. Absurd, sir.
Sure we should. Do whatever it takes.
|
|