=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

BUSH STILL SILENT ON THAI COUP. SHOULD HE AND BLAIR ISSUE ULTIMATUM?

user ballots

political :

BUSH STILL SILENT ON THAI COUP. SHOULD HE AND BLAIR ISSUE ULTIMATUM?


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Thu Sep 21, 06 - Tue Jun 16, 09

"Where is the ultimatum to the Thai junta?

HOW bizarre! A supposed democratic government in a supposedly civilised country - Thailand - is overthrown by the military, and the self-styled "Axis of Enduring Freedom" - the US and UK - are remarkably silent on the matter, even though the Thai Prime Minister was in New York at the time he discovered his employment had been arbitrarily terminated. Just to add sauce to this pudding of irony, it was while on a trip to that mighty citadel of a free world of free nations known as the UN. So where's the ultimatum from Bush and Blair to the Thai junta to get out of town?" UK Herald

The most that the Bush Administration could be bothered to do was trot out head PR flak Tony "You Got a Purty Mouth" Snow to say that the administration was "disappointed" that one of the most important democracies in Southeast Asia had suddenly been replaced by a military dictatorship. Bush, himself, remains absolutely silent on the issue, even though the coup happened as he was making a speech at the U.N. pompously demanding that the Muslim world obey his commands to install democracy.

Since he is so bombastic about democracy elsewhere in the world, should Bush, and his pal Blair, do what they seem to do compulsively wherever Muslims and oil are, and give Thailand an ultimatum to restore democracy, or else?

Yes, democracy is worth fighting for
No, they aren't Muslims, and they don't have oil. Who cares?
President Bush (and the USA) is waiting to see the reprocussions.
Democracy comes better from the bottom up, not from the top down


Ballot #102304 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
102299. Washington criticises Thai coup
102297. Why hasn't George W. Bush condemned the coup in Thailand?
74872. What would happen if US military commanders launched a coup d'etat against the Bush Administration?
57368. Which issue won Bush the 2004 election?
94839. Bush and Blair admit mistakes over Iraq. Do you admire their humility?
97631. Bush & Blair caught on tape, what implications do their words hold?
94497. What do you think is wrong with today's world leaders? eg. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, etc... ???
6130. Why all the Thai Girls are prostitutes?
114538. Do you think a military coup is needed to save America?
110481. Funniest Silent Movie Era Comedian


COMMENTS:
Voted : No, they aren't Muslims, and they don't have oil. Who cares?
Also refer to my comment on ballot #102299, please. I apologize for the extra work to read it, but it's equally applicable.
by Truthseeker013 on Thu Sep 21, 06 7:50pm [+]

It's probably got of their blessings. It wouldnt be the 1st time
by isay on Fri Sep 22, 06 2:42am [+]

It's probably got of their blessings. It wouldnt be the 1st time.
by isay on Fri Sep 22, 06 2:42am [+]

I'm hung over, the coup has got their blessings.
by isay on Fri Sep 22, 06 7:01am [+]

The U.S. wasn't silent, they categorically condemned the coup
by aya on Fri Sep 22, 06 8:08am [+]

Aya:

Bush said nothing. Absolutely nothing. All his bombast about democracy in the Middle East, and nothing, not a single peep, about the end of democracy in Thailand.

He left it to his pretty boy spokesman and an assistant yahoo to express the Administration's "disappointment." Hardly strong words. Obviously, the Bush Administration either doesn't really care about democracy, or it tacitly supports the coup in Thailand because it didn't like the individual who had been elected to run the country. Remember Bush's reaction when the coup in Venezuala temporarily eliminated democracy and put the oil oligarchs in charge? Bush just about had an orasm. And, of course, there is the reaction when Hamas won the Palestinian election fair and square.

My point is that Bush's is promotion of democracy in the Middle East is a ruse, and that the true Bush hates democracy and prefers dictatorship.

by cranky on Sat Sep 23, 06 7:03am [+]

Voted : Democracy comes better from the bottom up, not from the top down
Democratisation is best done from the bottom up. Imposing democracy from the top downward is usually a bit more unstable. Besides which, war is never the solution from my point of view.
by xxxxxxxx on Sat Sep 23, 06 8:32am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved