search this site: search the web:
Look, there's no advertisement anywhere! isn't that nice?

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT PAY-PER-VIEW EXECUTIONS?

user ballots

crime : crime :

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT PAY-PER-VIEW EXECUTIONS?


[+] serious ballot by jessandduane
created Mon Sep 25, 06

Some may argue that it is inhumane, but what did they do to get there, we could limit it to people on death row, or lifers. We could pay for the whole prison system this way, or the national debt...

no
yes
the greatest idea ever
inhumane
They should be televised to all of the public
Barbaric


Ballot #102475 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
100942. Ocean View shack or Desert view mansion?
70000. Should there be a maximum age for executions?
125804. Should all executions be carried out in public?
129720. Should the USA outsource its executions to China?
130081. Who has more executions - China or Texas?
125839. Which U.S. States Still Use Firing Squads In Executions ?
76701. If public executions for mass murderers and rapists were legal..
93438. In China, executions are a spectator event. Should the USA try this, and use the admission fees to pay off the national debt?
100456. What is your view of the Bible?
102472. Your view of Wicca


COMMENTS:
I disagree, it is ethically untenable, and morally reprehensible, ..... however I would make one exception, to see those lying traitor immoral psychopathic mass murdering criminals Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz etc. those dastardly fiends who have taken over your country and who are busy destroying it and your freedoms put to the sword. ;o)
by Ken_from_Dublin on Mon Sep 25, 06 3:09pm [+]

Why don't we get convicted CEO's, lobbyists, and politicians to fight to the death every Sunday instead of football. Football is too tame for us bloodthirsty Americans. However, I don't think ordinary convicts would generate much excitement for long. Let's watch Tom Delay go head to head with Jack Abramoff in a flamethrower duel? Or Saddam Hussein v. Karl Rove in a contest pitting them against each other with claw hammers. Imagine the excitement! Yes, you've hit on something. It's demented, but it does stir the blood.
by margaret123 on Mon Sep 25, 06 3:24pm [+]

This is even more barbaric and morally reprehensible than the death penalty. Making money off of this?? Why not feed them to some lions?
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Sep 25, 06 4:22pm [+]

Voted : yes
and we could text votes to spare lives while Ryan Seacrest hosts!
by MO_ on Mon Sep 25, 06 5:52pm [+]

Voted : no
I don't think it's any more inhumane than executing them normally, but it's just creepy. If someone wants to watch someone else die so bad they should just get Faces of Death or something. And I doubt enough people would participate to get rid of national debt.
by Kiki on Mon Sep 25, 06 8:59pm [+]

Executions should be televised, but that television should be made available to all of the public, though they should be televised in the middle of the night to avoid frightening children.
People need to see what the State is doing.
by Applerod on Mon Sep 25, 06 10:03pm [+]

No, applerod. They need to run them on regular network channels live and repeatedly on evening newscasts. People should be forced to have their children watch them. Then maybe people will see how barbaric it is.

"Mommy, why is smoke coming out of the top of that man's head" (After he gets electrocuted in the electric chair).

"Mommy, why is that man gasping for air and why do they have him tied down so he can't escape?"

Go ahead parents who support capital punishment... explain this stuff to your kids.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Sep 25, 06 10:13pm [+]

^Exactly. I think people have a right to know what the government is doing. We need more images, and not just more images of the administration of the death penalty, but more images of the (presently abstracted) mass death in Iraq. People don't tend to "get" these things until they see pictures of them.
by Applerod on Tue Sep 26, 06 12:28am [+]

Voted : no
It is barbaric and panders to the worst elements of voyeuristic sociopaths. I don't see how it could not contribute to coarsened attitides and wider acceptance of violence.
by Cathexis on Tue Sep 26, 06 7:05am [+]

It would be a great way to recover the cost of trials, housing and medical care provided for these animals.
by Grapost on Sun Oct 01, 06 7:13am [+]

Voted : yes
I would pay to see Saddam hang
by Guest User from [72.174.57.180] on Sat Dec 23, 06 11:46pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved