search this site: search the web:
Look, there's no advertisement anywhere! isn't that nice?

WHICH PRESIDENT HAS DONE MORE TO KILL OR CAPTURE OSAMA BIN LADEN & AL-QAEDA

user ballots

news related :

WHICH PRESIDENT HAS DONE MORE TO KILL OR CAPTURE OSAMA BIN LADEN & AL-QAEDA


[+] serious ballot by FiddleFaddleOnLSD
created Tue Sep 26, 06

George W. Bush
Bill Clinton

Ballot #102532 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
127185. Will the US capture or kill Osama bin Laden befor the Chimp leaves office?
127300. What if we did capture Osama Bin Laden....
95524. Is there a time when it would be OK to capture/kill terrorists?
79267. If bin Laden dies of natural causes before coalition troops ever capture him, would that be viewed as success or failure for the US??
14840. If you met Osama bin Laden, what would you do?
53452. Osama Bin Laden
97124. When did Osama bin Laden die?
86106. How should Osama bin Laden be executed?
97014. Where in the world is Osama Bin Laden?
112087. Is Osama bin Laden alive?


COMMENTS:
OK, lets have a big fight over it!! _Beelzebubba_Dubya _Beelzebubba_BJ
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Tue Sep 26, 06 2:29pm [+]

_Beelzebubba_Dick The next one will get him.
by _Beelzebubba on Tue Sep 26, 06 2:55pm [+]

IC_shock MAG_killme
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Tue Sep 26, 06 3:02pm [+]

Voted : Bill Clinton
Only a fool could think otherwise!
by MO_ on Tue Sep 26, 06 3:25pm [+]

This question invites a skewed result. Because George W. Bush was the post 9-11 President, he will have done more than Clinton. However, if we evaluate them before 9-11, then Clinton did far more in the last eight months of his tenure than Bush did in the first eight months in office. You have to believe that Bush is devoting big bucks and big resources to hunt down and kill Osama. This would be a crown jewel for him and the Republican Party just now.
by margaret123 on Tue Sep 26, 06 3:26pm [+]

No, it doesn't margaret. The first World Trade Center attack happened in 1993 when Bill Clinton was president as did the embassy and USS Cole bombings. There were plenty of attacks during Clinton's tenure that killed people.

It is also a highly relevant question because of the controversy over "who did more". One can make a case for or against Clinton as well as for or against Bush. Take your best shot.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Tue Sep 26, 06 3:43pm [+]

George bush, in that he has actually done something to go after al-qaeda. 5000 dead terrorists, and a good number of their upper ranks wiped out under bush.

Under clinton . . . . we pulled out of somalia, thus giving bin laden the reassurances he needed that america was a weak nation, easily forced to surrender at the first sign of american blood, leading him to go ahead with 911. No significant number of terrorists captured or killed, but he did keep one intern busy, possibly preventing her from running off and joining al-qaeda. We'll give him that one.
by herzog on Tue Sep 26, 06 3:54pm [+]

Voted : Bill Clinton
At least, when Clinton was shooting at bin Laden, he had credible intel that he was there at the time. Can Mister Bush say the same?

And, on a related topic, is anyone else as tired of whacking on this guy as I am?
by Truthseeker013 on Tue Sep 26, 06 4:08pm [+]

The Bush administration was in bed with Bin Laden and they used each other to promote their agendas. It's hard to believe that there are idiots with feeble enough minds to believe that Bush has done anything of value. In fact terrorism has escalated since the Bush Bums took office.

Hey Herzog, don't be jealous of Clinton's sex life, keep practicing and maybe one day you won't have to do it alone.

No one died when Clinton lied!
by elvislennon on Tue Sep 26, 06 4:18pm [+]

LOL elvis
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Tue Sep 26, 06 4:48pm [+]

Voted : Bill Clinton
Clinton tried harder, and with less motivation than 9-11.
by skylab on Tue Sep 26, 06 4:49pm [+]

The War in Afghanistan was larger than all the responses to terrorist attacks under Clinton's watch. Saying that, 9-11 was larger than all the terrorist attacks Clinton had to deal with. Did Clinton drop the ball? Sure. Did Bush? Sure. Scales were different but so to were the attacks.
by ClosetIguana on Tue Sep 26, 06 5:12pm [+]

herz -- 5000 dead people.

It takes more to qualify as a 'terrorist' than getting killed by Bush.

HTH.
by Cathexis on Wed Sep 27, 06 6:43am [+]

Voted : George W. Bush


Clearly.
by Black_Lava on Wed Sep 27, 06 9:03am [+]

Sure cath, they were all women and children and wedding goers. And reuters has the photos to prove it.

rolleyes


by herzog on Wed Sep 27, 06 3:31pm [+]

Both of them have failed America, Clinton just happened to have failed a whole lot worse.
by lowerclassbrats on Fri Sep 29, 06 6:53pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved