user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
And do you think they realize that by giving in to threats every time they are simply encouraging muslims to issue more threats and make more demands?
But what do you expect them to do? Have the opera go on and risk vandalism and rioting? Where is Liberal Democrat? He'll make an exuse on this
by aya on Tue Sep 26, 06 4:07pm
[+]
Well, the Opera is certainly in poor taste. One would hope that it wouldn't be staged due to lack of ticket sales. I just don't understand why everyone feels the need to kiss people's nether regions every time someone gets a little offended.
The audience protests of 2003, were they muslim?
by MO_ on Tue Sep 26, 06 6:35pm
[+]
Voted : No, the muslims should comform to our belief in freedom of speech
BUT, a lot of Muslims are good, normal people, regular as me- it's sad They're lumped in with the idiot Jihadist terrorists, there are all kinds of people going crazy for religion, Evangelicals are also preparing for a second-coming/Holy-War that'll blow all our minds. When I heard this^ on the news I felt it was ridiculous (don't mess with Mozart) but it's also a scary time to test the extremists.. well more and more people will be killed in the name of God either way. I learned more about this opera today, I really wish it wasn't an issue, the world's a hopeless shame to me.
by Jyl on Tue Sep 26, 06 9:27pm
[+]
I don't know. The point of that scene in the play doesn't seem to be wanting to criticise Islam specifically. The point was more so to criticise religion in general supposedly. Therefore, perhaps they should just adapt the scene to something else. Remove Mohammed from the play. The staging could replace the one of Mohammed with an image of some other religion. Perhaps a figure of Taoism? A lopped of head of Lao Tzu (the founding figure of Taoism) to replace that of Mohammed? That would settle things wouldn't it? A variety of religions would be put on display to be criticised- one religion originating in Europe (Ancient Greek religion), one religion originating in the Middle East (Christianity), one that originated in India (Buddhism), and one that originiated in China (Taoism). By replacing Islam and Mohammed with Taoism and Lao Tzu, the play could critique religion in general and not have to worry too much about Muslims, who in general are offended by any attempt to create an image, wheter good or bad, of their prophet Mohammed. Muslims are offended by any artificial image of Mohammed, whereas Christians, Buddhists, the ancient Greeks, and Taoists have like to build statues of the figures of their religions. My solution would allow the play to stay open, maintain its aim of criticising religion in general, and avoid sparking conflict. What do you think herzog? Replacing Islam and Mohammed with Taoism and Lao Tzu seems best to me. I am Taoist and would not at all be offended at all. And all the people I know who are Taoist, would not be offended even in the slightest bit either.
... in order to avoid conflict ...
Voted : No, the muslims should comform to our belief in freedom of speech
It probably wasn't as good as "Springtime for Hitler".
We need to respect people of ALL faiths.
OT: respect goes both ways. They can't bitch about disrespecting their religion one minute and the next call for the deaths of all infidels. Besides which, we in the west believe in free speech, you can protest, but you can't threaten with violence. Not over something like this. When they consider tolerating our civilized beliefs then perhaps we can talk about not ridiculing their primitive ways quite so much.
Besides which this opera wasn't even about muslims, they had representatives of many religions apparently and were criticizing religion in general.
|
|