WOULD THE USA HAVE INVADED IRAQ IF IRAQ HAD NO OIL?

search this site: search the web:

Vote on the Best, vote on the Worst, vote until your mouse finger hurts!

WOULD THE USA HAVE INVADED IRAQ IF IRAQ HAD NO OIL?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

WOULD THE USA HAVE INVADED IRAQ IF IRAQ HAD NO OIL?

[+] serious ballot by Ken_from_Dublin
ACTIVE Fri Sep 29, 06 - Wed Jun 24, 09

Yes
No

Ballot #102672 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
17352. Should Israel have been invaded instead of Iraq?
74608. Would George W. Bush have invaded Iraq even if 9/11 hadn't happened?
96111. Do you think Osama Bin Laden is grateful that GWB invaded Iraq rather than...
86190. Conservatives. If Bill Clinton invaded Iraq under false pretenses, how would you have defended him?
32823. Yes/No, should the French be allowed to participate in rebuilding Iraq eventhough they have decided not to no longer commit troops to Iraq?
91603. True or False: George W. Bush decided to invade Iraq after Saddam Hussein refused to allow weapons inspectors into Iraq.
96193. WMDs found in Iraq! Does this justify the U.S invasion of Iraq?
112200. Does the US really want democracy in Iraq, and leave Iraq to the Iraqis?
13695. What should have been done with Iraq?
104225. Did Iraq have WMD?

COMMENTS:
Come on ken thats easy. A resounding NOOOOOOOOOOOO!

by isay on Fri Sep 29, 06 3:48pm [+]

Voted : No
Absolutely not.

Anyone notice that the dictator of Kazakhstan is on a state visit to the Bush White House today? Anyone notice the "coincidence" that the "Democracy President" is sucking up to the nasty dictator of a Central Asian nation that just happens to have HUGE oil reserves? Anyone notice that the nasty dictator of Kazakhstan has just announced that Kazak oil and gas will now start flowing into western pipelines?

by cranky on Fri Sep 29, 06 4:08pm [+]

Voted : No
I'll wager that we'd be as hand-in-glove with one S. Hussein in the War on Terror against Iran as we are now with one P. Musharraf in the War on Terror (TM) against Iraq...

by Truthseeker013 on Fri Sep 29, 06 4:20pm [+]

Voted : No
Oil hates Freedom.

by Cathexis on Mon Oct 02, 06 6:29am [+]

No recently i have heard that we are failing with the war. Now that we are having trouble over there for the first time ever Bush has come out and began talking about different ways for fuel besides oil. I just think thats odd that now all of a sudden he finds this important when he never seemed to care about it before.

by US_MarineCorp69 on Sun Jan 28, 07 7:39pm [+]

Voted : No
no they would have left them to fight eachother... bush only sems to do anything if he knows he'll benefit from it in someway. i dont think it's any of americas or britains buisness, but hey, when did either government listen to rational thinking?

by Guest User from [82.28.19.197] on Thu Dec 27, 07 8:31am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |