user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
oh boy! Charlie Sheen and now Ed Asner!! Scraping the bottom of the barrel aren't you? Is he one of the scholars of the 9/11 truth movement?
I'm going to remain skeptical until britney spears and john travolta get on board, or at least madonna.
I don't know why people seem to think celebrity endorsements mean anything. Oh they're rich and famous, we must follow their every words.
This is one of those (many) things which you silly shills are avoiding; EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed down at near free fall speed into their footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition. Can any of you cite a single exception to this? With a photo, video, or anything else. and I'll repeat this nice and big since you seem to have problems reading it NO MENTION OF THE WORD "FIRE", YOU'RE IMAGINING IT! Now please hurry and respond with some FACTS to back your bullshit! Here's another one for you; WTC1 AA Flt 11 8:46:40 UTC - FAA last primary radar contact 8:46:30 UTC - seismic event/NIST Both times are real and accurate QUESTION- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event? (It can not be the aircrash since that happened at 8:46:40) Now, please don't start in here with any long-winded arguments; logically, because your beloved NIST embraced the 2005 revision of the seismic time by Dr. Kim (which infers UTC), the only way you win is you MUST discredit the 8:46:40 last primary radar contact that occurred (and no radar "sweep/refresh problem" exists as the contact was recorded (it's the last little triangle in the graph in the flight path study; it's all in the paper)). Ginny Carr audiotape has a ~9.2 second gap between initial explosion and aircrash. The 9/11 Commission avoided the time of the initial seismic event. The 9/11 Commission avoided the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements. NIST avoided the 9/11 Commission’s time. NIST avoided the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements. ANSWER- The only possibility: EXPLOSION(S)
Yup... the ball's uh rollin... and the American middle is becoming desensitized to the improbabilities of this administrations heinous decisions.
by MO_ on Sun Oct 01, 06 7:26am
[+]
Hollywood, or not... Discreditng these people who have a right to voice, and an audience to listen, as superficial is, as it's been said, is "Beneath You!"
by MO_ on Sun Oct 01, 06 7:40am
[+]
Damn! If Ed Asner said it, it must be so.
Well bugger me!!
I hear two things from the left-wingers out there: 1.) Geeorge W. Bush is an evil genius, or 2.) George W. Bush is a bungling monkey. Make up your minds.
Just leave out the 'genius' part and he is actually both Bostonian, you can bet your bottom dollar on it.
Misuse of Power -Midwest Book Review; Tactfully co-authored by Ed Asner (award-winning actor and political activist) and Burt Hall, Misuse Of Power is a very strongly recommended read political activists engaged in anti-right wing politics, as well as the non-specialist general reader for its revealing truths and highly informative content. Misuse Of Power offers a wealth of highly researched documentation on how corrupt and sadistic the very right-wing Republican currently in control of American government truly is. Readers will discover the overriding powers of a majority republican executive and congressional government and how the two may cause terrible affects upon the whole American population.
Why am I supposed to care about the opinions of a bloated old marxist hypocrite like Ed Asner when I have logic, sanity and reason to fall back on?
Well when the hell are you gonna start falling back on it???!!!
{George W. Bush is a bungling monkey. Make up your minds. by Bostonian on Sun Oct 01, 06 9:50am} Yes he certainly acts like one, but that doesn't mean that Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, and his other monkey handlers don't have any brains. Are you trying to pretend that they don't exist and that there are no other advisors or decision makers?
{when I have logic, sanity and reason to fall back on? by SoldierBlue on Sun Oct 01, 06 11:47am} Since when did you ever start using them then? We're still waiting for you to reveal that you have any "logic, sanity and reason", because so far all you've displayed in "head in the sand" denial and "Let's pretend nobody notices". You think that you're so smart, maybe you can answer this question; WTC1 AA Flt 11 8:46:40 UTC - FAA last primary radar contact 8:46:30 UTC - seismic event/NIST Both times are real and accurate QUESTION- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event? (It can not be the aircrash since that happened at 8:46:40) or cite anything to back the 9/11 "Arabs did it with boxcutters" silliness with an answer to this one; EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed down at near free fall speed into their footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition. Can any of you cite a single exception to this? With a photo, video, or anything else. and by the way, a four storey toy factory does not count as a steel-framed hi-rise building. Neither do two-storey wood & brick townhouses. Nor do buildings that are only partially finished, that made only of cheap steel jacks with concrete plates but no steel crossbeams. Also, neither do all-concrete apartment buildings. I've seen a lot of excuses, but I've yet to see any actually cite a real steel-framed hi-rise.
My question is how is Ed Asner qualified to know if 9-11 is a conspiracy or not? I'm not saying he doesn't, just asking why you present him as some kind of expert without establishing as an authority. My mother, for example, believes that the moon landings were faked, but she is just talking through the very damaged tissue of her brain. So, what gives Ed Asner expert status?
Since when did anyone ned to be 'qualified' to express an opinion, besides scientists and academics qualify their opinions on the enents of 9/11 with scientific data and hard facts - all backed up by irrefutable seismic, audio and eyewitness accounts.
Gee, the same 78-year-old Ed Asner that's been seeking mental illness therapy in recent years, and suffers from delusions, an anxiety disorder and depression. Why am I not surprised?
The cancellation of Lou Grant in 1982 was the subject of much controversy and resulted from much controversy. Reportedly the series had significant enough ratings in its last season to be renewed, but the network declined to renew it because of controversies created by Asner in using both the series and his presidency of the Screen Actors Guild as political soapboxes. Asner's outspokenness in opposing U.S. intervention in El Salvador created a problem for the series and the network with advertisers and the public at large. Asner also gave one press conference not long before the show was cancelled in which he came across as soft on communism. Some critics drew parallels between Asner's activism and storylines on the series. After Lou Grant was cancelled, Asner accused the Reagan White House of pressuring CBS to cancel the series.
I dont care ed is still a great actor and Lou Grant was still his best role.
by seon on Sun Oct 01, 06 7:48pm
[+]
Voted : No, the Bush/PNAC Conspiracy is not a fable and a fraud
"Award winning director, producer and actor Ed Asner...." Absolutely classic. Who next - the spirit of Edgar Cayce?
|
|