user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
This is the only logical explanation.
The plane was taken to a secret location. Each of the passenger voices were then replicated using state of the art software, so that they can fake phonecalls later in the day. Then the passengers were led outside and shot, one by one. Their bodies were then burnt and buried in a big hole in the desert. The plane was then dismantled piece by piece, and melted down into cans of heineken.
Of course I don't have any hard evidence to back up this claim, but I believe it wholeheartedly, because I'm a bit dim.
You are going to convince the brainwashed. Those of the Alex Jones Temple, that live in Alex Jones Town and drink his Kool-aid.
Let me predict how the "debate" will go:
Lovelynice
- Irrelevant out of context quote by Rumsfeld (if it was even said). FACT
- Seismic data from the WTC (irrelevant to this ballot) FACT
- More irrelevant posts. FACT
Ken
More irrelevant and easily debunked information posted and spammed into this ballot (like all the others).
Continued postings of REAL facts and debunks of nonsense posted by the two users above.
More irrelevant posts that have already been debunked numerous times.
There you have it.
It did hit the Pentagon. Landing gear and other airplane parts were found, body parts, parts of luggage etc. They don't usually put those in a missile.
Let me offer this advice: Do not discuss religion, politics, or conspiracy theories with others. No one is ever going to change their mind, and all you end up with after such a discussion with people who don't agree with you is hard feelings. Let it lie.
Voted : I know what happened (see comment)
The passengers were tricked into boarding a giant missile made to look like a 757. The missile was attached to a military C-130 transport, which took off for the pentagon to release its missile, which had phoney plastic wings and bogus engines, and of course a AA paint job.
The real Flight 77 jet was sold to CIA agent Alex Jones, who had it melted down to make tinfoil hats which he sells on Ebay to conspiracy quacks along with his book. The proceeds from the sale of the tinfoil hats and book are diverted to Iran, whose government then promises to act oddly and make scary threats to the world on behalf of the Bush administration in order to create panic among Americans, thus creating support for the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ship from Antares whisked it away!
Elvis hijacked it.
If a Boeing 757 really did hit the Pentagon, and the Bush administration wants everybody to be 100% assured that it did, why don’t they do two simple things:
1) Show us the numerous videotapes that were confiscated within minutes of the attack from the Sheraton National Hotel, and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), along with all footage which was captured by a plethora of cameras situated around the Pentagon.
2) Better yet, after the government rescinded their original story that the 757 was “vaporized” into thin air upon impact, they claimed to have most of the wreckage stored in a warehouse. Why not simply open the doors to this hangar and let everyone see the parts? Think how easy that would be.
But for some strange reason, no one from the U.S. government is stepping forward to squash all these pesky “conspiracy rumors” that Flight 77 never hit the Pentagon. Why? Think about it. The guilty parties responsible for carrying-out the 9-11 terror attacks are loathsome mass murderers of the worst kind. If they were found guilty of committing these crimes, the citizens of this nation would scream for their heads on a silver platter.
With this simple premise in mind, if Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorists were indeed behind the Pentagon attack (and not a cabal of bloodthirsty psychopaths within the U.S. government), don’t you think George Bush and his military brass would do everything in their power to PROVE it? This isn’t rocket science, folks. Wouldn’t they show us each and every confiscated videotape and say, “There, now you can see it with your own eyes – a Boeing 757 flying into the Pentagon.” To lend even more credence to their argument, they’d break-out every other video until there was such a preponderance of evidence that even the most hard-core conspiracy theorist would be convinced.
Or else they’d get Dan Rather, Bill O’Reilly, Wolf Blitzer, Peter Jennings and Tom Brokaw – along with teams of cameramen – and parade them through this mysterious hangar filled with parts from Flight 77. Then we could see the evidence in full-color on ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News.
But guess what. Despite how utterly simple this solution is, the government isn’t doing it. Why? Because they know the videos would show that a Boeing 757 DID NOT hit the Pentagon, and there is no warehouse filled with the legitimate wreckage from Flight 77.
It’s that simple; and if you disagree with this premise, ask yourself one question: how many mass-murderers want to be arrested and convicted for their crimes (especially one as notorious as 9-11)? The answer is: none of them would. So, if our government could undeniably prove their case once-and-for-all, they would do it in a heartbeat. But they can’t. Thus, everything else – including the PentaLawn, Hani Hanjour, the 18 foot impact hole and the lack of debris – is icing on the cake further proving their guilt.
In the end, I only have a few simple words to say to the US government: show us the videos, and show us the hangar filled with wreckage. That’s not too much to ask from someone who is innocent, is it?
LOL @ Jinn, Blacklava and gnomehunter.
^^^ But I'm fucked if I can answer Ken's damning reposte, it makes sense so it must be wrong. -
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD
Hey, Ken!
You didn't answer the ballot question.
What happened to Flight 77?
Or don't you actually have a theory?
loosechangeguide.com/
Ken doesn't answer questions.
Many things could have happened to flight 77 (and I don't be spending my life 24/7 lying on behalf of the pnac murderers like you you pisser on the graves of the victims of 9/11 whom you'll never meet if you are of a religious persuasion - so allow some time to reply)
- while I don't claim to know what happened to flight 77 as it went off the radar - I do know what DID NOT happen to it, and it most certainly DID NOT hit the Pentagon, something else did, something that has already been captured on video, and can be seen far more clearly in the videos that they refuse to release.
Why do you think they haven't released the videos long ago by now Nipple?
-Fruit loop alert folks in anticipation of PNAC murderering propaganda and nipplies ->
So without a cogent theory about what happened you are ready to reject all the physical evidence?
You sure have put a lot of time and effort into ignoring the truth.
^^^said he to himself.
Trouble is, Ken that I am accepting the physical evidence (DNA, plane wreckage, damage to buildings etc).
I have read everything that the conspiracy theorists claim and have found a) no evidence to back up the claims and b) no realistic alternative explanations for the events (where is flight 77 for example?)
We're all still waiting for that one piece of solid physical evidence to back up any of your claims.
Try googling beyond the comfort zone of your own self denial, your biggest obstacle against learning the truth is your own inability to scale and conquer that same obtacle - namely that gigantic mountain of your own prejudice.
You're forgetting, Ken that I started in your position.
I've read all you have - and more I'd wager.
"You're forgetting, Ken that I started in your position."
As did I.
"You're forgetting, Ken that I started in your position."
by wideheadofknowledge
Explain what you mean by "Ken...I started in your position..."
 ....this should be VERY interesting.... 
You too nipplie ... what's your excuse! 
I used to believe the theories that you now believe, until I bothered to look in places other than prisonplanet and loosechange.
We have messaged each other about this, Ken. It's not like you to 'forget' things is it?
I started out fully believing in a conspiracy - I bought the whole 'In Plane Sight', 'Loose Change' bullsh*t hook, line and sinker.
It all began to unravel when I actually stopped using conspiracy websites for my info - weird huh? I tried to find some up-to-date articles about how the hijackers were still alive (they're not) or about how Flight 77 could have been vaporized (it wasn't) etc etc etc.
I started to actually look at the 'evidence' that I was relying on and what did I realise? There is no evidence! Nothing! Not a single shred of solid evidence.
There are two possible outcomes. 1) You will come to your senses and realise what you have been doing or,
2) You will continue to bleat with all the other sheep (just like the JFK conspiracy theorists who STILL have yet to turn up one single piece of evidence).
I can't speak for wolf or anyone else but I for one think you believe what you are saying but good god, man! Look at OUR pictures, sources and video clips and make comments on them that aren't just silly insults or attempts to wave them away!
Look at the two links on my user page... what are your thoughts?
you can't compare thiswith the jfk theories. those are based simply on ignorance. they did not research the issue and made stupid assumptions (like assuming the governor's seat in the car was directly in front of the president's). that's not intentional (though they certainly weren't too eager to look into the matter). this is a totally different matter. thisis bush's people, coming onto primarily left-wing websites, spreading misinformation they created, to try and confuse us and keep us from taking their government down. ken, and the creators of loose change, are government lackeys trying to make us look like crazies. their claims are not simply erroneous, they are deliberate, concious deceptions.
|
|
