SHOULD BUSH'S MILITARY CONFLICTS BE REFERRED TO AS THE "PHALLIC WARS?"

search this site: search the web:

Tired of the national election? Vote on Bestandworst.com instead!

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

political : SHOULD BUSH'S MILITARY CONFLICTS BE REFERRED TO AS THE "PHALLIC WARS?"

[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Thu Oct 05, 06 - Tue Jun 30, 09
It seems like in Bush's (and the neocons) various military invasions, and his macho posturing, there is a fair amount of compensation going on. A few manhood issues, perhaps?

That being the case, should historians refer to Bush's wars, including the upcoming war with Iran, as the "Phallic Wars?"

Yes, the "Phallic Wars" would be an appropriate term
No, how dare you suggest that Bush and the neocons have manhood issues
No. They should be referred to as the "Righteous" Wars

Ballot #102961 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes, the "Phallic Wars" would be an appropriate term
Yes, and he can fellate Crown Prince Abdullah on the white house lawn too.

by _Beelzebubba on Thu Oct 05, 06 10:05am [+]

"No. They should be referred to as the "Righteous" Wars"

So, does that make Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, the Righteous Brothers?

by cranky on Thu Oct 05, 06 11:32am [+]