COMMENTS:
"The Muslim problem?
Are you aware that during the rise of the Nazis, they referred to it as "the Jewish problem?
Stupid ballot!
by isay on Sat Oct 07, 06 2:12pm
[+]
Another idiot joins the ranks of BestandWorst.
by isay on Sat Oct 07, 06 2:13pm
[+]
No, it's not a stupid ballot. If France and other western nations wait until Muslims become the majority, it'll be too late too save their cultures. Muslims are are out-multiplying them 7-1. It wouldn't make a difference if Muslims assimilated, but they don't. Countries on the brink of becoming Islamicized should halt all immigration from Muslim nations immediately.
More racism, more hate, more demonisation and dehumanisation of an entire swathe of humanity, men, women and children.
Welcome to 1930's Nazi vs. Jews Germany, re packaged in the American flag for the Project for the New American Century.
Your stupid comment goes hand in hand with this stupid ballot. You better start shagging some Females then to catch up.
by isay on Sat Oct 07, 06 3:11pm
[+]
Muslims are not the enemy. It's fascinating that anyone would believe that.
^^That's right. The enemy is Islam.
How dare you Jinn_the_Fascist wilfully and knowingly misinterpret Applerods wise comment so as to infer that it concurs with your own racist/idiot views, HOW DARE YOU!
^A question requires one of these--> ?
Voted : None- no Western nation will face such a thing in 20 years
I don't believe that any Western nation will come under rule by Muslims.
Firstly, I think Americans need to understand the difference between immigration and immigrants in Europe as to opposed the situation in the United States.
First of all, there are far less non-caucasians in Europe. The number of Muslims actually in Europe is not very large compared to multiculturalism in the United States. France, the Netherlands and Britain have the most, and even then it is not really that pervasive. The immigration policies of Europe are much more closed than that of the United States. Reflecting on this, do not begin any alarmism over Muslims in Europe. It is really quite small in number. It is nowhere near to the number of Mexicans in the United States. It is true, that Muslims, though small in number in comparison with immigrants in the USA, are much less assimilated and integrated- it should be remembered that they are small in number. Giving statistics of high birth rates isn't too significant either. So a quite small group is producing more? That will not have any consequence of a 'take-over' in twenty years. Let us not lose our sense of calculation.
Next, there is more racism in Europe than there is in the US. Caucasians (whites) in Europe think themselves oas being the 'natives', and thus have believe no matter what the demographics, their cultural norms, institutions and laws should be the rule of the nation.
Also, European nations are ALL discussing reducing immigration drastically. The numbers of new immigrants will be reduced.
I am not worried at all of Europe coming under 'Muslim rule' in 20 years. That sounds like nonsensical alarmism to promote an agenda. I would suggest that it is better to promote one's agenda without exaggerations or deceit (intentional or unintentional).
Are Muslims a race??
^^^Are the Jews a race?^^^
It's a pity you don't demonstrate the same integrity when attacking anyone who dares to criticise Judaism as you do when attacking or defending attacks on Muslims.
Arch hypocrisy at it's festering worse.
Yes, for the most part Jews are genetically distinguishable from other ethnic groups. Someone with half a brain out to know that. With so few Jews in the world, this should be obvious considering they all came from the same very small area (excluding converts). If you like, I can prove this.
Muslims are all over the world, black, white, Asian. Someone with half a brain ought to be able to figure out they are not a race, but followers of a religion. If someone is anti-Muslim that doesn't make them a "racist". It makes them anti-Muslim or perhaps a bigot. Not a racist unless you are so ignorant as to think that all Muslims are Arabs. Which perhaps may be the case with many users.
BTW clueless ken, I didn't attack Muslims in this ballot. I just asked a question. You apparently must think that all Muslims are Arabs. That, or not have a single clue about genetics, ethnic groups and races. Which is it? Or is it your limited vocabulary that necessitates the use of an inaccurate term?
Would you say Jews are Racist because they dont want intermarriage between Jews and non-Jew people.
by isay on Sun Oct 08, 06 7:07pm
[+]
Intermarriage with non-Jews is forbidden in Deuteronomy 7:3. That doesn't have much to do with the race question though.
The answer is also no, because Jews can be of a different racial make-up, Ashkenazim vs Sephardi is one example, also the Beta Israel. A clear example of differing racial appearance would be with the Kohanim. Kohanim status is passed from father to son (as opposed to the usual matrilineal method). There are Kohanim that are of different colors or races (once again, Ashkenazim and Sephardi, but also there are some black African Kohanim as well), but almost all of them share the Kohanim Modal Hapoltype. Using standard scientific principles such as genetic drift, this ties all Kohanim back to a common ancestor around 3300 years ago. ie. Aaron, the brother of Moses. There is no prohibition on marriage between them. A Jew can marry a Beta Israel (Ethiopia) as well as a Bnei Menashe (India, but moving to Israel). All look quite different, but they may certainly marry each other. Still, there is a common genetic ancestry. As far as traditional definitions of race, the answer is again "no". It is more along the lines of marrying within religion, although that generally does tie back to the Israelites of 3000+ years ago. Converts, etc can be of any race or ethnic group, Chinese, African, Arab, British, Japanese. They can marry any other Jew.
This genetic commonality is not much different from my father's genetic relationship to other Muskogee tribal members. When a group is somewhat isolated and/or marries within that group or people in the area near it, certain genetic commonalities occur. Native American DNA has differences from for example traditional British DNA.
I could go much more into the genetics of this if you like, but it will greatly increase the comment area of the ballot.
mto ... ignorance, xenophobia, and paranoia are such an ugly combination ...
Okay, yes. Islam is not a race. But I was describing Muslims in Western Europe, and I was generalising that most Muslims in Europe are not white. Yes, generalisations are flawed, so aplogies on that.
I was contemplating of making it 'Muslims' and 'Westerners' in order to make it more about culture (which it is) BUT I was hesitant to use this, because such a description is unfair to Westernised Muslims- so I couldn't use such a dichotomy because I believe that Muslims can be Westerners. So that's why I went for the generalised, but also flawed description of most Muslims in Western Europe being non-caucasian.
|
