user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
If there were no karma wars or personal insults, then Ken wants to hear only his own ideas.
Same as. I asked him a question, he accused me of lying, so he blocked me. A pointless function for pointless people.
I stated the fact that the windows in the pentagon were 5ft across.
Ken called me a liar.
I asked Ken if he was denying the fact that the windows were 5ft across.
He called me a liar again, and blocked me.
Very mature.
His tinfoil hat rusted while at the cleaners, he was turned down as a guest for "Coast to Coast AM," he lost the secret undersea map to Atlantis he'd found at a bus stop, and he's just in a pissy mood?
Voted : Another reason (see comment)
Children can't deal with mature subject matter. When children don't like to hear the truth they cover their ears and say "la la la la". In this case, instead of covering his ears Ken uses the convenience of the ignore list and then says "ha ha ha ha".
But wait! He didn't do it, it was a conspiracy by the jews and the CIA to make him seem like a tool and thus discredit his conspiracy theories! Yes, that must be it, the government is out to get him./
Voted : He can't handle the truth!
Ken has resorted to vicious personal attacks because he cannot deal with people refuting his arguments. All he and his ballot buddies want to do is cut and paste the same old nonsense over and over. They create ballots that are essentially the same as the ones they did a couple of weeks ago so that they can start the ballot and vote spamming again.
This is the logical fallacy of Argumentum ad Nauseam. This is a flawed argument. A statement is made repeatedly (possibly by different people) until nobody cares to refute it anymore, at which point the statement is asserted to be true because it is no longer challenged.
Sound familiar?
I thought so.
I also agree with the first 5 commenters on this ballot.
Why are you lying wide head? 
Real desperation stakes here, he has not - and never has been - on my ignore list folks.
Will he be a man and apologise for lying here? - I won't be holding my breath.
This is the the kind of crap I have to put up with from this stalking nut job folks on a daily basis folks.
Go and visit any of the 9/11 ballots and see the nonsense he posts and how he comes out the loser on EVERY point that is debated with me or anyone else who takes him to task on it.
His latest claim for instance is that the hole in that newly released photo of the Pentagon facade is 90 feet wide! 
Sad Ken, very sad.
I checked at the time folks, and he was, as was myself.
Ken, whatever integrity you had, just got smeared with shite.
I WIN AS USUAL, AND I JUST PUT UP A BALLOT EXPOSING YOU FOR THE LIAR THAT YOU ARE.
YOU SUNK TO A NEW LOW HERE TONIGHT.
MAYBE I SHOULD PUT YOU ON MY IGNORE LIST AFTER ALL.
THIS VILE HYPOCRITE HAS HAD ME ON HIS IGNORE LIST FOR MONTHS ->
Voted : He can't handle the truth!
Ken has resorted to vicious personal attacks because he cannot deal with people refuting his arguments. All he and his ballot buddies want to do is cut and paste the same old nonsense over and over. They create ballots that are essentially the same as the ones they did a couple of weeks ago so that they can start the ballot and vote spamming again.
This is the logical fallacy of Argumentum ad Nauseam. This is a flawed argument. A statement is made repeatedly (possibly by different people) until nobody cares to refute it anymore, at which point the statement is asserted to be true because it is no longer challenged.
Sound familiar?
I thought so.
I also agree with the first 5 commenters on this ballot.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD
ARE THEY THE SAME REASONS YOU HAVE ME ON YOUR IGNORE LIST FIDDLE, EVEN THIOUGH YOU AREN'T ON MINE EITHER?
MORE LIES TOO FROM WOLF, CHECK OUT THAT BALLOT FOLKS AND NOWHERE DO I CALL HIM A LIAR, GO SEE THE TRUTH FOR YOURSELVES AND HIS NONSENSE POINTLESS ARGUMENT ABOUT WINDOW DIMENSIONS.
What a loser you are. You never expected "Wide Knowledge" would post a ballot ( smart one at that) to talk about you putting him on your ignore list.
Now you are digging a deeper hole with blatant vociferous lies. Well, when hit rock bottom in your hole, you will know you have found your new home.
Why aren't you busy stoking the ovens in readiness for your single handed crusade to 'slay Islam' you vile hate filled racist, it's chilling to have this same hatred cast it's evil eyes in my direction, go away and die and do us all a favour.
Why are you lying wide head?
Real desperation stakes here, he has not - and never has been - on my ignore list folks.
Will he be a man and apologise for lying here? - I won't be holding my breath.
This is the the kind of crap I have to put up with from this stalking nut job folks on a daily basis folks.
Go and visit any of the 9/11 ballots and see the nonsense he posts and how he comes out the loser on EVERY point that is debated with me or anyone else who takes him to task on it.
His latest claim for instance is that the hole in that newly released photo of the Pentagon facade is 90 feet wide!
Okay. Settle down boys. Thats what my Mom says when we get rambunctious. You boys shake hands and make up. Or kiss and make up. However you swing.
Ah! Shame on you, Ken!
Still, it can't be pleasant having your pet 'theory' being constantly shown up for what it truly is - nonsense.
^ Shame on you! what's this a Ken bashing ballot?
He's probably blocking you for the same reason I did. Cos ur an annoying idiot. He's ignoring you, mate, that means he doesn't want to interact with you. Stop stalking the guy and get yourself a life.
by IC on Mon Oct 09, 06 3:41pm
[+]
"He's probably blocking you for the same reason I did."
Why's that, to put a childish insult on my user page?
"Stop stalking the guy"
I should have realised that you viewed debate as stalking.
I seemed to remember you posting a pointless irrelevant insult on one of my ballots because the topic bored you.
I gave you one hit of negative karma only to be given some straight back along with more childish insults and threats that you would 'wipe me out'.
None of these things apply to the debates I was having with Ken.
He simply could not handle having his lies shown up for what they were.
Thanks for your input.
Debate? Ken decides to ignore you so you make ballots about him. I call that stalking, son, you don't handle rejection too well do ya? lol.
Wiping you out? I said It would be for legit reasons, I've had this name back for over a week, did I try to wipe you out? You're making yourself look foolish again.
By the way everyone, wideheadofemptyspace can't handle critisism either, he appears to have blocked me from his ballots, lol.
You forget I'm a maintainer and can approve my own comments so it's all a bit pointless. A bit like your opinions really :o) .. IC
you might want to leave people alone, if you wish to be left alone.
by LCD on Wed Oct 11, 06 4:06pm
[+]
So fascist WideHeadofHypocrisy has blocked IC for his common sense remarks and observations in support of me here?
You couldn't make it up folks could you?
See, it just proves HOW stupid these OCT's are
"So fascist WideHeadofHypocrisy has blocked IC for his common sense remarks and observations in support of me here?"
Nice try.
He's blocked because he is an abusive, obnoxious individual who threatened to wipe me out with his negative karma attacks.
Take your own advice and practice what you preach.
IC 1 - 0 Wuthering Heights Of Hypocrisy
"practice what you preach"
I practice and preach open honest debate and do not resort to karma attacks unless absolutely warranted.
I have only ever added users to my ignore list who have made nothing but worthless childish insults on my ballots.
Since when have we agreed on anything? Have I ever hit you with unwarranted negative karma? Ever threatened you or outrageously insulted you?
Ask all those users who I have had disagreements with in the past - herzog and lil ape spring to mind - ask them if I ever hit them with shitloads of negative karma.
Don't be fooled by IC or anyone else - I am sparing with the karma and I welcome the debate no matter how much we disagree with each other. You of all people should know that.
|
|
