COMMENTS:
Yes I mean 9-11.
Voted : No
But I suppose it is easier to blame Clinton than to evaluate ones' own accountability.
Voted : No
It's not fair to place blame on any US President. In my opinion, it's the US itself that the attackers were targeting. Not an individual. N0t a left/right thing. The attackers hate the U.S. If we're assigning blame? I blame the attackers.
Voted : No
What should have Clinton have done differently? When I have an answer to this, then perhaps I will consider blaming Clinton.
With the North Korean situation- partly blaming Clinton makes more sense because there are direct allegations of what he did wrong. Whereas here, on this topic, I ahve yet to see a direct outline of what Clinton supposedly did wrong and what he should have supposedly have done instead.
I think blaming Clinton on this seems like a cheap shot.
There are some righties who hate Clinton so much, they would blame him for Pearl Harbor if they thought they could convince anyone.
It's not any ONE person's fault.
The real culprit is US foreign policy during the mid- to late 20th century, especially its utterly partisan support of Israel.
Voted : No
And, for anyone who ventured a "yes" as reply, "The 9/11 Commission Report", on sale at bookstores everywhere.
I'd say blaming anyone for the actions of a madman is ludicrous. But blaming and holding to account the leader of the executive branch of government (Bush) for not bringing a criminal (Osama) to justice after he commited the biggest attack against America in history is not only practical it would be insane not to.
Yes, but only if you've seduced a PAGE of the same gender or read MY PET GOAT while your country was under attack.
Voted : No
I blame the terrorists.
Voted : No
Nope
|
